论住宅小区车位、车库的归属

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

作者:

吴湛

导师:

唐烈英

导师单位:

经济法学院(生态法学院)

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

车位;车库;建筑物区分所有权;物权法

摘要:

城市住宅小区车位、车库的归属是当前社会观注的热点问题,但现行 《物权法》采取当事人合同约定的方式确定住宅小区车位、车库的归属, 未能从根本上解决住宅小区车位、车库数量不足、归属不清的矛盾。为此, 本文采用比较法学、价值分析法学等多种研究方法,从我国实际出发,通 过比较吸收外国相关立法的先进经验,用建筑物区分所有权理论对不同类 型住宅小区车位、车库进行分析,对现行《物权法》有关住宅小区车位、 车库的规定作出评价,引入住宅小区法定车位、车库,以完善我国住宅小 区车位、车库法律制度,并最终解决住宅小区车位、车库的归属问题。 除引言和结论外,本文分三个部分,约 3.5 万字。 第一部分,指出《物权法》采用当事人约定方式确定住宅小区车位、 车库归属的弊端,介绍其它国家和地区法律对住宅小区车位、车库的相关 规定,并用比较法学的研究方法进行归纳分析。明确要解决住宅小区车位、 车库的归属问题,就应当依据建筑物区分所有权理论对小区车位、车库按 不同的类型加以分析探讨。 第二部分,用建筑物区分所有权理论对我国现实中常见的小区车位、 车库分类进行分析。确定占用业主共有的道路或其他场地的车位、车库依 法归属全体业主共有,属于人民防空工程的地下室车库依法归属国家所 有。小区其它的车位、车库都具有构造上、利用上和登记上的独立性,可 以成为建筑物区分所有权的专有部分。而其他类型的车位、车库包括非属 人民防空工程的地下室车库、层高低于 2.2 米的一楼架空车库、在高层建 筑的某一楼层修建的车库、在小区修建的独立停车楼等。 第三部分,提出引入小区法定车位、车库,以完善我国住宅小区车位、 车库的法律制度。论述此制度设计的意义,详细阐述此制度设计的内容, 并进一步提出法定车位、车库的使用方法。最后阐明在此制度下小区增建 车位、车库以及其他车位、车库的归属和使用。 本文为完善我国住宅小区车位、车库的法律制度,提出了小区法定车 位、车库制度设计,包括住宅小区法定车位、车库,增建车位、车库,以 及其他车位、车库的归属和使用。在此制度下,对每个小区的法定车位车 库配备情况划分等级、用星级来表示,住宅开发商必须修建符合星级数量 标准的法定车位、车库,法定车位、车库由全体业主共同共有、循环使用; 2 在法定车位、车库之外,开发商可以修建增建车位、车库,增建车位、车 库归属开发商,开发商有权占有、使用、收益、处分;在法定车位、车库 和增建车位、车库之外,占用业主共有的道路或其他场地的车位、车库依 法归属全体业主共有,属于人民防空工程的地下室车库依法归属国家所 有。如能得以实施,不仅能克服现行《物权法》“合同约定说”的缺点, 保障业主的合法权益,使小区车位、车库数量不足、归属不清的矛盾得到 彻底解决,还能最大限度地利用城市紧张的土地资源,使资源的配置合理 化,达到创建节约型社会、构建和谐社会的目的。

学科:

民商法学

提交日期

2026-04-07

引用参考

吴湛. 论住宅小区车位、车库的归属[D]. 西南政法大学,2008.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 论住宅小区车位、车库的归属
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 2025tj114
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 吴湛
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 民商法学院(知识产权学院)
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法律硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2008
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 唐烈英
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 经济法学院(生态法学院)
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 车位;车库;建筑物区分所有权;物权法
  • dc.subject
  • parking lot; garage; Partitioned Ownership of Building Area;Real Right Law
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 城市住宅小区车位、车库的归属是当前社会观注的热点问题,但现行 《物权法》采取当事人合同约定的方式确定住宅小区车位、车库的归属, 未能从根本上解决住宅小区车位、车库数量不足、归属不清的矛盾。为此, 本文采用比较法学、价值分析法学等多种研究方法,从我国实际出发,通 过比较吸收外国相关立法的先进经验,用建筑物区分所有权理论对不同类 型住宅小区车位、车库进行分析,对现行《物权法》有关住宅小区车位、 车库的规定作出评价,引入住宅小区法定车位、车库,以完善我国住宅小 区车位、车库法律制度,并最终解决住宅小区车位、车库的归属问题。 除引言和结论外,本文分三个部分,约 3.5 万字。 第一部分,指出《物权法》采用当事人约定方式确定住宅小区车位、 车库归属的弊端,介绍其它国家和地区法律对住宅小区车位、车库的相关 规定,并用比较法学的研究方法进行归纳分析。明确要解决住宅小区车位、 车库的归属问题,就应当依据建筑物区分所有权理论对小区车位、车库按 不同的类型加以分析探讨。 第二部分,用建筑物区分所有权理论对我国现实中常见的小区车位、 车库分类进行分析。确定占用业主共有的道路或其他场地的车位、车库依 法归属全体业主共有,属于人民防空工程的地下室车库依法归属国家所 有。小区其它的车位、车库都具有构造上、利用上和登记上的独立性,可 以成为建筑物区分所有权的专有部分。而其他类型的车位、车库包括非属 人民防空工程的地下室车库、层高低于 2.2 米的一楼架空车库、在高层建 筑的某一楼层修建的车库、在小区修建的独立停车楼等。 第三部分,提出引入小区法定车位、车库,以完善我国住宅小区车位、 车库的法律制度。论述此制度设计的意义,详细阐述此制度设计的内容, 并进一步提出法定车位、车库的使用方法。最后阐明在此制度下小区增建 车位、车库以及其他车位、车库的归属和使用。 本文为完善我国住宅小区车位、车库的法律制度,提出了小区法定车 位、车库制度设计,包括住宅小区法定车位、车库,增建车位、车库,以 及其他车位、车库的归属和使用。在此制度下,对每个小区的法定车位车 库配备情况划分等级、用星级来表示,住宅开发商必须修建符合星级数量 标准的法定车位、车库,法定车位、车库由全体业主共同共有、循环使用; 2 在法定车位、车库之外,开发商可以修建增建车位、车库,增建车位、车 库归属开发商,开发商有权占有、使用、收益、处分;在法定车位、车库 和增建车位、车库之外,占用业主共有的道路或其他场地的车位、车库依 法归属全体业主共有,属于人民防空工程的地下室车库依法归属国家所 有。如能得以实施,不仅能克服现行《物权法》“合同约定说”的缺点, 保障业主的合法权益,使小区车位、车库数量不足、归属不清的矛盾得到 彻底解决,还能最大限度地利用城市紧张的土地资源,使资源的配置合理 化,达到创建节约型社会、构建和谐社会的目的。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Currently, among people there are debates on the vesting right of the garages or parking lots in a residential area. But according to the current Real Right Law, parties make an agreement to define the vesting right of the garages or parking lots in a residential area. However, it is impossible to completely solve the problem that there are inadequate garages or parking lots and the problem of the vesting rights vagueness. Therefore, this paper is to evaluate the present regulation in Real Right Law on garages or parking lots in a residential area, to propose regulation on legal garages or parking lots in a residential area, and to ultimately solve the vesting right of garages or parking lots in a residential area, in the methodologies of Comparative Law and Value Analysis Law. This research starts from the reality in China, absorbs the advanced legislation experience abroad, analyzes different garages or parking lots in different types of residential areas by the theory of Partitioned Ownership of Building Area, and evaluates the regulation in current Real Right Law on garages or parking lots in a residential area, for the purpose of solving the problem of garages or parking lots in a residential area. This thesis falls into 3 parts, about 35,000 words. Part one points out the defects of the parties’ agreement convention to regulate the vesting right of garages and parking lots in a residential area, and introduces the regulation on garages or parking lots in a residential area in domestic laws. This part also introduces the parking relevant regulation abroad, and conducts and analyzes in the methodology of Comparative Law. It introduces the Partitioned Ownership of Building Areas and makes it clear that if we want to thoroughly solve the problem of garages or parking lots in a residential area, we have to explore and analyze the different types of garages or parking lots in a residential area in the methodology of the Partitioned Ownership of Building Areas. Part two analyzes the different types of garages or parking lots in domestic residential area in the methodology of the Partitioned Ownership of Building Areas. This paper confirms that the garages or parking lots in a 2 residential area which take the public spaces must belong to all owners in the residential areas, and that the garages or parking lots which belong to the people’s air-defense system must belong to PRC. Besides, according to the theory of the Partitioned Ownership of Building Areas, the other garages or parking lots in a residential area have the independence of construction, use, and registry and may be defined as a private property with the construction vesting right distinction. Other garages or parking lots include the garages or parking lots which do not belong to the people’s air-defense system, the first floor overhead garages whose height is lower than 2.2 meters, the garages which is built on the first floor, and the separately built garage building. Part three proposes author’s regulation on legal garages or parking lots in a residential area, discusses the significance of such regulation, and elaborates the proposed regulation, in addition to the usage of legal garages or parking lots in a residential area. At last, this paper elucidates the use and the vesting right of additional garages or parking lots and the other garages or parking lots in a residential area according to such proposed regulation. Aiming at legislating qualified parking relevant laws and regulations, author proposes regulation on legal garages or parking lots in a residential area, which includes the vesting right and the use of legal garages or parking lots, additional garages or parking lots and other types of garages or parking lots. In such regulation, the outfit of legal garages or parking lots in a residential area must be classified and shown with stars; every residential area must build enough qualified garages and parking lots; legal garages or parking lots in a residential area belong to all owners in the residential area and must be in recycle; Developer may build additional garages or parking lots besides legal ones, Developer has the vesting right of the additional garages and parking lots, and Developer has the right of occupying, using, charging, and handle the additional garages and parking lots; besides the legal and additional garages or parking lots in a residential area, other types of garages or parking lots which take the place of the public places in a residential belong to all owners, and the underground garages or parking lots which belong to the people’s air-defense system is owned by People’s Republic of China. If these regulations are 3 carried out, it could not only overcome the defects of the parties’ agreement convention in Real Right Law, protect the owners’ legal rights, thoroughly solve the problems caused by inadequate garages and parking lots and vague vesting right, and also could maximize the use of urban land resources, rationalize the allocation of resources, and finally achieve the goal to create a conservation-oriented society and build a harmonious society.
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2026-04-07
回到顶部