论自然资源国家所有权的行使

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

作者:

李文秀

导师:

孟甜

导师单位:

经济法学院(生态法学院)

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

自然资源;国家所有权;所有权行使;委托代理机制

摘要:

自然资源是人类经济社会发展的物质基础,需要通过法律规范加强对其管理和保 护。我国《宪法》《民法典》等现行的自然资源法律法规已相对完善,自然资源国家所 有权制度是我国现行的一项重要制度,而如何行使该权利一直是自然资源国家所有权实 现的核心问题。从实践来看,虽然国家也在不断探索,但是由于立法的不足等原因,我 国的自然资源国家所有权行使仍然存在诸多问题。因此,要进一步从理论方面明晰现有 的理论论争,反思实践中的问题,进而促使我国自然资源国家所有权行使问题的不断完 善。 在处理自然资源国家所有权行使的问题时,必须明确该权利的构成。自然资源作为 该权利中的一个基本概念,虽然立法中并无明确界定,但可依照其特征确定其内涵,并 在此基础上明确国家所有自然资源的范围。自然资源国家所有权的主体是“国家”和“全 民”,但是以国务院为权利行使的代表;其客体包括宪法中规定的七类属于国家所有的 自然资源;在内容上,该权利包括占有、使用、收益和处分的积极权能以及权利受到损 害时的消极权能,即物权请求权。自然资源国家所有权的法律性质决定了其行使的不同, 虽有不同观点,但是公权私权混合说更加符合现实需求。 自然资源国家所有权的行使以法律授权为基础,目前在宪法、民法典和各自然资源 单行法中明确了所有权行使的法律依据,形成了相对完善的法律法规体系。从实践来看, 在该权利的行使中,形成了国务院代表国家统一行使、国务院各部门和地方政府实际行 使权利等行使方式的既有路径。此外,国家也在积极探索委托代理机制的试点,以推动 形成合理有效的自然资源国家所有权的行使模式。 但是在自然资源国家所有权行使中,依然存在自然资源国家所有权行使的授权不 足,自然资源国家所有权行使混乱,自然资源国家所有权行使过度引发侵害私人利益、 产生生态破坏、环境污染等问题。这主要是由于自然资源国家所有权行使的立法不足, 缺乏对自然资源国家所有权行使的约束与指引,自然资源国家所有权的权能不明确,国 家所有权行使机制难以满足现实需求,自然资源国家所有权行使的配套制度不足等原因 导致。 因此,要完善自然资源国家所有权行使制度,就需要健全所有权行使的规范体系, 明确自然资源国家所有权行使的原则,完善自然资源国家所有权能,规范自然资源国家 所有权的委托代理机制,完善委托代理机制的配套制度,以实现自然资源国家所有权行 使的制度重构。

学科:

法律*

提交日期

2026-04-02

引用参考

李文秀. 论自然资源国家所有权的行使[D]. 西南政法大学,2022.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 论自然资源国家所有权的行使
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20200351021972
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 李文秀
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 经济法学院(生态法学院)
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法律硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2022
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 孟甜
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 经济法学院(生态法学院)
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 自然资源;国家所有权;所有权行使;委托代理机制
  • dc.subject
  • natural resources;state ownership;exercise of ownership;Principal-agent mechanism
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 自然资源是人类经济社会发展的物质基础,需要通过法律规范加强对其管理和保 护。我国《宪法》《民法典》等现行的自然资源法律法规已相对完善,自然资源国家所 有权制度是我国现行的一项重要制度,而如何行使该权利一直是自然资源国家所有权实 现的核心问题。从实践来看,虽然国家也在不断探索,但是由于立法的不足等原因,我 国的自然资源国家所有权行使仍然存在诸多问题。因此,要进一步从理论方面明晰现有 的理论论争,反思实践中的问题,进而促使我国自然资源国家所有权行使问题的不断完 善。 在处理自然资源国家所有权行使的问题时,必须明确该权利的构成。自然资源作为 该权利中的一个基本概念,虽然立法中并无明确界定,但可依照其特征确定其内涵,并 在此基础上明确国家所有自然资源的范围。自然资源国家所有权的主体是“国家”和“全 民”,但是以国务院为权利行使的代表;其客体包括宪法中规定的七类属于国家所有的 自然资源;在内容上,该权利包括占有、使用、收益和处分的积极权能以及权利受到损 害时的消极权能,即物权请求权。自然资源国家所有权的法律性质决定了其行使的不同, 虽有不同观点,但是公权私权混合说更加符合现实需求。 自然资源国家所有权的行使以法律授权为基础,目前在宪法、民法典和各自然资源 单行法中明确了所有权行使的法律依据,形成了相对完善的法律法规体系。从实践来看, 在该权利的行使中,形成了国务院代表国家统一行使、国务院各部门和地方政府实际行 使权利等行使方式的既有路径。此外,国家也在积极探索委托代理机制的试点,以推动 形成合理有效的自然资源国家所有权的行使模式。 但是在自然资源国家所有权行使中,依然存在自然资源国家所有权行使的授权不 足,自然资源国家所有权行使混乱,自然资源国家所有权行使过度引发侵害私人利益、 产生生态破坏、环境污染等问题。这主要是由于自然资源国家所有权行使的立法不足, 缺乏对自然资源国家所有权行使的约束与指引,自然资源国家所有权的权能不明确,国 家所有权行使机制难以满足现实需求,自然资源国家所有权行使的配套制度不足等原因 导致。 因此,要完善自然资源国家所有权行使制度,就需要健全所有权行使的规范体系, 明确自然资源国家所有权行使的原则,完善自然资源国家所有权能,规范自然资源国家 所有权的委托代理机制,完善委托代理机制的配套制度,以实现自然资源国家所有权行 使的制度重构。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Natural resources are the material basis for human economic and social development, and it is necessary to strengthen their management and protection through legal norms. my country's "Constitution", "Civil Code" and other laws and regulations have established a relatively complete legal system of natural resources. The national ownership system of natural resources is an important part of the institutional system, and how to exercise this right has always been the core issue of the realization of natural resources countries. . From a practical point of view, although the state is constantly exploring, there are still many problems in the exercise of state ownership of natural resources in my country due to insufficient legislation and other reasons. Therefore, it is necessary to further clarify the existing theoretical debates from the theoretical aspect, and reflect on the problems in practice, so as to promote the improvement of the exercise of state ownership of natural resources in my country. To solve the problem of the exercise of state ownership of natural resources, the legal composition of state ownership of natural resources should be clarified. Natural resources are the basic concept of national ownership of natural resources. Although there is no clear definition in the legislation, their connotations can be determined according to their characteristics, and on this basis, the scope of nationally owned natural resources can be clarified. The subjects of state ownership of natural resources are the "state" and "the whole people", but the State Council is the representative of the exercise of rights; its objects include the seven categories of natural resources that are owned by the state as stipulated in the constitution; in terms of content, the rights include possession, use , the positive power of income and disposition, and the negative power when rights are damaged, that is, the right to claim property rights. The legal nature of national ownership of natural resources determines the difference in its exercise. Although there are different viewpoints, the mixed theory of public rights and private rights is more in line with practical needs. The exercise of state ownership of natural resources is based on legal authorization. At present, the legal basis for the exercise of ownership has been clarified in the Constitution, the Civil Code and individual natural resource laws, and a relatively complete legal and policysystem has been formed. From a practical point of view, in the exercise of state ownership of natural resources, existing paths have been formed in which the State Council exercises on behalf of the state in a unified manner, and various departments of the State Council and local governments actually exercise rights. In addition, the state is also actively exploring the pilot of the principal-agent mechanism to form a reasonable and effective model for exercising state ownership of natural resources. However, in the exercise of state ownership of natural resources, there are still insufficient authorization for the exercise of state ownership of natural resources, confusion in the exercise of state ownership of natural resources, and excessive exercise of state ownership of natural resources lead to problems such as infringement of private interests, ecological damage, and environmental pollution. This is mainly due to insufficient legislation on the exercise of state ownership of natural resources, lack of constraints and guidance on the exercise of state ownership of natural resources, unclear powers and functions of state ownership of natural resources, difficulty in meeting the actual needs of the exercise mechanism of state ownership of natural resources, and supporting the exercise of state ownership of natural resources. due to lack of system. Therefore, in order to improve the system of national ownership of natural resources, it is necessary to improve the normative system for the exercise of national ownership of natural resources, clarify the principles for the exercise of national ownership of natural resources, improve the functions of national ownership of natural resources, regulate the principal-agent mechanism of national ownership of natural resources, and enrich the principal-agent mechanism. To realize the institutional reconstruction of the exercise of national ownership of natural resources
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2026-04-02
回到顶部