互联网联合贷款的法律规制

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

作者:

周园润

导师:

刘志伟

导师单位:

经济法学院(生态法学院)

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

互联网联合贷款;法律规制;优化

摘要:

互联网联合贷款指是两家或两家以上的持牌放贷机构,根据相同的贷款合同和要求,按照共同约定的贷款发放比例,共同为具有借贷资质的企业或个人提供的互联网线上贷款服务。经多年发展,互联网联合贷款目前已发展成为互联网贷款中的最重要业务品种之一,在国内普惠金融领域发挥着愈发重要的作用。随着互联网联合贷款市场的演进和发展,与之伴随的相关法律规范也在不断拟定推出和优化完善。当前,国家金融监管大格局不断演进发展,法律规制对互联网联合贷款的规范牵引作用不断凸显,在此背景下,在对互联网联合贷款和其法律规制的现状、特点、缺点和优化路径的探究就显得更加重要。本硕士论文由引言和三部分构成,从互联网联合贷款的市场实践与风险、互联网联合贷款法律规制的现状考察以及互联网联合贷款法律规制的优化完善四个方面对互联网联合贷款的法律规制开展论述,全文共计四万余言。 第一部分从互联网联合贷款的逐步兴起、互联网联合贷款的业务模式、互联网联合贷款潜藏的风险等 3 个方面对互联网联合贷款的市场实践与风险展开论述。互联网联合贷款的逐步兴起是传统商业银行和互联网金融平台的双向奔赴,同时互联网联合贷款业务的迅猛发展是还具备了相应政策发展条件。 第二部分是互联网联合贷款法律规制的现状考察。互联网联合贷款法律制度随着互联网联合贷款市场的发展、演进而一步一步成型确立,发展到当前阶段主要有《商业银行互联网贷款管理暂行办法》等三部规范。《商业银行互联网贷款管理暂行办法》被认定为针对商业银行的网贷服务的最严格的制度,旨在促进金融科学的进步,使之走上一条合乎市场需求的、有序的、可持续的发展之路。本部分通过全面梳理以往涉及互联网金融的相关政策,以期达到更好的监管效果。与此同时,互联网联合贷款法律规制也暴露出一些问题,本部分从设计思路问题和重点内容遗漏问题两个角度进行了剖析。一设计思路混乱,具体表现为互联网联合贷款经营者主体风险防范设计混乱和互联网贷款经营者行为风险防范设计混乱。二重点内容遗漏。具体表现为未对联合贷款模式下风控把关的先后顺序进行限定、对互联网联合贷款模式下的各类贷款期限规定不明确、对互联网联合贷款模式下的贷款金额规定不完善、贷后催收合法性要求遗漏等方面。 4 万方数据互联网联合贷款的法律规制 第三部分互联网联合贷款法律规制的优化完善提出,一是设计思路优化:从商业银行经营主体适格性风险层面,明确地方法人银行准入标准;从商业银行经营行为风险防范层面上,建议设立互联网联合贷款的专属法律规制。二是重点内容的补充:从商业银行经营行为风险防范层面上,明确合作双方风控顺序;从商业银行经营行为风险防范层面上,分品种明确贷款期限上限;商业银行经营行为风险防范层面上,分品种明确贷款金额上限;从商业银行经营行为风险防范层面上,明确贷后催收的合规、合法性要求;以及从明确个人信息收集的相关要求、明确贷款利率定价要求等方面进行了分析。

学科:

经济法学

提交日期

2026-04-01

引用参考

周园润. 互联网联合贷款的法律规制[D]. 西南政法大学,2024.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 互联网联合贷款的法律规制
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • TD20200301008
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 周园润
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 经济法学院(生态法学院)
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法学硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2024
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 刘志伟
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 经济法学院(生态法学院)
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 互联网联合贷款;法律规制;优化
  • dc.subject
  • Internet syndicated loan;legal regulation;Optimize
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 互联网联合贷款指是两家或两家以上的持牌放贷机构,根据相同的贷款合同和要求,按照共同约定的贷款发放比例,共同为具有借贷资质的企业或个人提供的互联网线上贷款服务。经多年发展,互联网联合贷款目前已发展成为互联网贷款中的最重要业务品种之一,在国内普惠金融领域发挥着愈发重要的作用。随着互联网联合贷款市场的演进和发展,与之伴随的相关法律规范也在不断拟定推出和优化完善。当前,国家金融监管大格局不断演进发展,法律规制对互联网联合贷款的规范牵引作用不断凸显,在此背景下,在对互联网联合贷款和其法律规制的现状、特点、缺点和优化路径的探究就显得更加重要。本硕士论文由引言和三部分构成,从互联网联合贷款的市场实践与风险、互联网联合贷款法律规制的现状考察以及互联网联合贷款法律规制的优化完善四个方面对互联网联合贷款的法律规制开展论述,全文共计四万余言。 第一部分从互联网联合贷款的逐步兴起、互联网联合贷款的业务模式、互联网联合贷款潜藏的风险等 3 个方面对互联网联合贷款的市场实践与风险展开论述。互联网联合贷款的逐步兴起是传统商业银行和互联网金融平台的双向奔赴,同时互联网联合贷款业务的迅猛发展是还具备了相应政策发展条件。 第二部分是互联网联合贷款法律规制的现状考察。互联网联合贷款法律制度随着互联网联合贷款市场的发展、演进而一步一步成型确立,发展到当前阶段主要有《商业银行互联网贷款管理暂行办法》等三部规范。《商业银行互联网贷款管理暂行办法》被认定为针对商业银行的网贷服务的最严格的制度,旨在促进金融科学的进步,使之走上一条合乎市场需求的、有序的、可持续的发展之路。本部分通过全面梳理以往涉及互联网金融的相关政策,以期达到更好的监管效果。与此同时,互联网联合贷款法律规制也暴露出一些问题,本部分从设计思路问题和重点内容遗漏问题两个角度进行了剖析。一设计思路混乱,具体表现为互联网联合贷款经营者主体风险防范设计混乱和互联网贷款经营者行为风险防范设计混乱。二重点内容遗漏。具体表现为未对联合贷款模式下风控把关的先后顺序进行限定、对互联网联合贷款模式下的各类贷款期限规定不明确、对互联网联合贷款模式下的贷款金额规定不完善、贷后催收合法性要求遗漏等方面。 4 万方数据互联网联合贷款的法律规制 第三部分互联网联合贷款法律规制的优化完善提出,一是设计思路优化:从商业银行经营主体适格性风险层面,明确地方法人银行准入标准;从商业银行经营行为风险防范层面上,建议设立互联网联合贷款的专属法律规制。二是重点内容的补充:从商业银行经营行为风险防范层面上,明确合作双方风控顺序;从商业银行经营行为风险防范层面上,分品种明确贷款期限上限;商业银行经营行为风险防范层面上,分品种明确贷款金额上限;从商业银行经营行为风险防范层面上,明确贷后催收的合规、合法性要求;以及从明确个人信息收集的相关要求、明确贷款利率定价要求等方面进行了分析。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Internet joint loan refers to the Internet online loan service jointly provided by two or more licensed lending institutions for enterprises or individuals with loan qualification according to the same loan contract and requirements and the agreed loan granting ratio. After years of development, Internet syndicated loan has now developed into one of the most important business types in Internet loans, playing an increasingly important role in the domestic inclusive finance field. With the evolution and development of the Internet joint loan market, the relevant legal norms are also constantly being formulated, promoted and optimized. At present, the overall pattern of national financial regulation is constantly evolving, and the regulatory role of legal regulation on Internet syndicated loans is increasingly prominent. In this context, it is more important to explore the status, characteristics, shortcomings and optimization path of Internet syndicated loans and their legal regulations. This master's thesis consists of an introduction and three chapters. It discusses the legal regulation of Internet syndicated loans from four aspects: the market practice and risk of Internet syndicated loans, the status quo of legal regulation of Internet syndicated loans, and the optimization and improvement of legal regulation of Internet syndicated loans. The full text totals more than 40000 words. The first part discusses the market practice and risks of Internet syndicated loans from three aspects: the gradual rise of Internet syndicated loans, the business model of Internet syndicated loans, and the potential risks of Internet syndicated loans. The gradual rise of Internet joint loan is a two-way rush of traditional commercial banks and Internet financial platforms. At the same time, the rapid development of Internet joint loan business is also equipped with corresponding policy development conditions. The second part is the current situation of the legal regulation of Internet syndicated loans. The legal system of Internet joint loan has been established step by step with the development and evolution of the Internet joint loan market. At the current stage, there are three regulations, namely, the Interim Measures for the Administration of Internet Joint Loans of Commercial Banks, and the Notice on Strengthening the Administration of Internet Loan Business of Commercial Banks to Improve the Quality and Efficiency of Financial Services. The Interim Measures for the Administration of Internet Joint Loans of Commercial Banks has been identified as the most stringent system for online loan services of commercial banks, 6 万方数据互联网联合贷款的法律规制 aiming to promote the progress of financial science and make it embark on an orderly andsustainable development path that meets the market demand. This chapter comprehensivelycombs the previous policies related to Internet finance in order to achieve better regulatoryeffects. At the same time, the legal regulation of Internet syndicated loans also exposes someproblems. This chapter analyzes the design ideas and the omission of key content. I. Thedesign idea is confused, which is embodied in the confusion of risk prevention design ofInternet joint loan operators and the confusion of risk prevention design of Internet loanoperators' behavior. The second key content is omitted. Specifically, the sequence of riskcontrol checks under the joint loan model was not limited, the terms of various loans underthe Internet joint loan model were not clearly defined, the amount of loans under the Internetjoint loan model was imperfect, and the legal requirements for post loan collection wereomitted. The third part proposes the optimization and improvement of the legal regulation ofInternet syndicated loans. The first is the optimization of design ideas: from the level of theeligibility risk of commercial banks' operating entities, define the access standards of localcorporate banks; From the perspective of risk prevention of commercial banks' operationbehavior, it is suggested to establish exclusive legal regulations on Internet joint loans. Thesecond is to supplement the key content: from the perspective of risk prevention incommercial bank operations, clarify the risk control order of both parties in cooperation;From the perspective of risk prevention in commercial bank operations, clarify the upper limitof loan term by category; At the level of risk prevention in commercial bank operations, theupper limit of loan amount should be clearly defined by category; From the perspective ofrisk prevention in commercial bank operations, clarify the compliance and legalityrequirements for post loan collection; And an analysis was conducted from the aspects ofclarifying the relevant requirements for collecting personal information and clarifying thepricing requirements for loan interest rates.
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2026-04-01
回到顶部