雇员受害赔偿基本问题研究——以衡平原则为线索

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

作者:

黄瑶

导师:

张力

导师单位:

民商法学院(知识产权学院)

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

雇员受害赔偿;衡平原则;雇佣关系;职务行为;归责原则

摘要:

在雇员受害赔偿案件的处理中,雇佣关系的判断、雇员执行职务行为的认定和雇员 受害赔偿归责原则的选择这三个基本问题一直是困绕司法实践的难题。而要处理好雇员 受害赔偿案件,关键在于要平衡好雇主与雇员之间的利益。故本文以衡平原则为线索, 对雇员受害赔偿中的三个基本问题进行探讨,提出笔者的观点和看法,以期对司法实践 中雇员受害赔偿案件的处理有所帮助。 本文从以下几个部分展开对雇员受害赔偿基本问题的研究: 第一部分:导论——衡平原则对解决雇员受害赔偿纠纷案件的指导意义。首先,介 绍衡平原则的起源、涵义及适用。其次,归纳了衡平原则对处理雇员受害赔偿纠纷的意 义。然后,提出雇员受害赔偿的基本问题。指出衡平原则的最终贯彻必须通过认定雇佣 关系、判断职务行为与确立归责原则来实现。表明本文在坚持衡平原则这一思想指导下, 采用司法案例分析与学理理论分析相结合的研究方法,对雇员受害赔偿的三个基本问题 进行探讨。 第二部分:基于衡平原则的雇佣关系的认定。第一,提出关于雇佣关系认定的司法 案例,引出雇佣关系认定中的争点与分歧。第二,介绍雇佣关系的基础理论。第三,对 雇佣关系与相近法律关系进行区分。第四,总结雇佣关系的立法状况及司法实践。第五, 表明笔者的观点:基于衡平原则认定雇佣关系应采取综合标准。第六,对司法案例进行 评析,从法学理论和法律规定两方面详细阐明理由和依据,提出笔者对于案件处理意见 的观点和看法。 第三部分:基于衡平原则的职务行为的认定。第一,提出关于职务行为认定的司法 案例,引出职务行为认定中的争点与分歧。第二,介绍职务行为认定的理论学说。第三, 总结雇员职务行为的立法状况及司法实践。第四,表明笔者的观点:基于衡平原则对职 务行为认定应采用内在关联性标准。第五,对司法案例进行评析,从法学理论和法律规 定两方面详细阐明理由和依据,提出笔者对于案件处理意见的观点和看法。 第四部分:基于衡平原则的雇员受害赔偿归责原则的选择。第一,提出有关雇员受 害赔偿归责原则的司法案例,引出争点与分歧。第二,介绍有关归责原则的理论选择。 第三,总结了雇员受害赔偿归责原则的立法规定及司法实践。第四,表明笔者的观点: 基于衡平原则对雇员受害赔偿应采用无过错责任原则并适用过失相抵。第五,对司法案 例进行评析,从法学理论和法律规定两方面详细阐明理由和依据,提出笔者对于案件处 理意见的观点和看法。 结论总结了全文,再次重申在司法实践中要解决好雇佣关系的判断、职务行为的认 定与归责原则的确立这三个雇员受害赔偿案件中的基本问题,关键在于要遵从衡平原 则,以及基于衡平原则所应当采用的认定标准与适用的归责原则。

学科:

民商法学

提交日期

2026-01-23

引用参考

黄瑶. 雇员受害赔偿基本问题研究——以衡平原则为线索[D]. 西南政法大学,2010.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 雇员受害赔偿基本问题研究——以衡平原则为线索
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 2007125
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 黄瑶
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 民商法学院(知识产权学院)
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法律硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2010
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 张力
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 民商法学院(知识产权学院)
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 雇员受害赔偿;衡平原则;雇佣关系;职务行为;归责原则
  • dc.subject
  • Compensation for Employee' s Injury;Equitable Principle;Relationship;Duty Act;Imputation Principle
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 在雇员受害赔偿案件的处理中,雇佣关系的判断、雇员执行职务行为的认定和雇员 受害赔偿归责原则的选择这三个基本问题一直是困绕司法实践的难题。而要处理好雇员 受害赔偿案件,关键在于要平衡好雇主与雇员之间的利益。故本文以衡平原则为线索, 对雇员受害赔偿中的三个基本问题进行探讨,提出笔者的观点和看法,以期对司法实践 中雇员受害赔偿案件的处理有所帮助。 本文从以下几个部分展开对雇员受害赔偿基本问题的研究: 第一部分:导论——衡平原则对解决雇员受害赔偿纠纷案件的指导意义。首先,介 绍衡平原则的起源、涵义及适用。其次,归纳了衡平原则对处理雇员受害赔偿纠纷的意 义。然后,提出雇员受害赔偿的基本问题。指出衡平原则的最终贯彻必须通过认定雇佣 关系、判断职务行为与确立归责原则来实现。表明本文在坚持衡平原则这一思想指导下, 采用司法案例分析与学理理论分析相结合的研究方法,对雇员受害赔偿的三个基本问题 进行探讨。 第二部分:基于衡平原则的雇佣关系的认定。第一,提出关于雇佣关系认定的司法 案例,引出雇佣关系认定中的争点与分歧。第二,介绍雇佣关系的基础理论。第三,对 雇佣关系与相近法律关系进行区分。第四,总结雇佣关系的立法状况及司法实践。第五, 表明笔者的观点:基于衡平原则认定雇佣关系应采取综合标准。第六,对司法案例进行 评析,从法学理论和法律规定两方面详细阐明理由和依据,提出笔者对于案件处理意见 的观点和看法。 第三部分:基于衡平原则的职务行为的认定。第一,提出关于职务行为认定的司法 案例,引出职务行为认定中的争点与分歧。第二,介绍职务行为认定的理论学说。第三, 总结雇员职务行为的立法状况及司法实践。第四,表明笔者的观点:基于衡平原则对职 务行为认定应采用内在关联性标准。第五,对司法案例进行评析,从法学理论和法律规 定两方面详细阐明理由和依据,提出笔者对于案件处理意见的观点和看法。 第四部分:基于衡平原则的雇员受害赔偿归责原则的选择。第一,提出有关雇员受 害赔偿归责原则的司法案例,引出争点与分歧。第二,介绍有关归责原则的理论选择。 第三,总结了雇员受害赔偿归责原则的立法规定及司法实践。第四,表明笔者的观点: 基于衡平原则对雇员受害赔偿应采用无过错责任原则并适用过失相抵。第五,对司法案 例进行评析,从法学理论和法律规定两方面详细阐明理由和依据,提出笔者对于案件处 理意见的观点和看法。 结论总结了全文,再次重申在司法实践中要解决好雇佣关系的判断、职务行为的认 定与归责原则的确立这三个雇员受害赔偿案件中的基本问题,关键在于要遵从衡平原 则,以及基于衡平原则所应当采用的认定标准与适用的归责原则。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • In the handling of compensation case of employee' s injury, the basic three issues including judgment of employment relationship, recognition of performance of duty act by the employee and selection of imputation principle of compensation for employee' s injury have long been the conundrum that perplexes judicial practice. The key to properly handle compensation case of employee' s injury lies in the balance of the interests between the employer and the employee. Therefore, the present paper utilizes equitable principle as the clue and discusses the three basic issues in compensation for employee' s injury and proposes the opinions and views of the author, hoping to be conducive to the handling of compensation case of employee' s injury in judicial practice. The present paper makes discussions into basic issues of compensation for employee' s injury in the following several parts: The first part is Introduction, which proposes that equitable principle provides guiding meaning for the settlement of compensation case of employee' s injury. Firstly, this part introduces the origination, connation and application of equitable principle. Then, this part concludes the meaning of equitable principle to the settlement of compensation dispute of employee' s injury. And then, this part puts forward the basic issues in compensation for employee' s injury, and indicates that the ultimate implementation of equitable principle must be realized by recognition of employment relationship, judgment of performance of duty act by the employee and determination of imputation principle. All these show that the present paper, by sticking to equitable principle as ideological guiding, adopts research method in combination of analysis of judicial cases and analysis of principle theory and discusses the three basic issues in compensation for employee' s injury. The second part elaborates recognition of employment relationship on the basis of equitable principle. First, this part brings out judicial case concerning recognition of employment relationship, so as to raise the focus and dispute in recognition thereof. Second, this part introduces basic theory about employment relationship. Third, this part makes differentiation between employment relationship and similar legal relationships. Fourth, this part concludes status quo of legislation and judicial practice of employment relationship. Fifth, this part puts forward the opinions of the author, that is, recognition of employment relationship on the basis of equitable principle should adopt comprehensive criterion. And sixth, this part evaluates and analyzes judicial case, elaborates reasons and bases from the perspective of legal theory and legal provision and puts forward the opinions and views of the author concerning opinions of handling of the case. The third part elaborates recognition of duty act on the basis of equitable principle. First, this part brings out the judicial case concerning recognition of duty act, so as to raise the focus and dispute in recognition thereof. Second, this part introduces theories and principles concerning recognition of duty act. Third, this part concludes status quo of legislation and judicial practice of duty act. Fourth, this part puts forward the opinions of the author, that is, recognition of duty act on the basis of equitable principle should adopt relevancy criterion. And fifth, this part evaluates and analyzes judicial case, elaborates reasons and bases from the perspective of legal theory and legal provision and puts forward the opinions and views of the author concerning opinions of handling of the case. The fourth part elaborates selection of imputation principle of compensation for employee' s injury on the basis of equitable principle. First, this part brings out the judicial case concerning imputation principle of compensation for employee' s injury, so as to raise the focus and dispute in recognition thereof. Second, this part introduces theory selection of imputation principle. Third, this part concludes legislative provision and judicial practice of imputation principle of compensation for employee' s injury. Fourth, this part puts forward the opinions of the author, that is, on the basis of equitable principle, principle of no-fault liability should be adopted in compensation for employee' s injury and fault balance should be applied. And fifth, this part evaluates and analyzes judicial case, elaborates reasons and bases from the perspective of legal theory and legal provision and puts forward the opinions and views of the author concerning opinions of handling of the case. Conclusion part concludes the whole paper and reiterates that the key to properly handle the basic three issues in compensation case of employee' s injury including judgment of employment relationship, recognition of performance of duty act and determination of imputation principle lies in the follow of equitable principle, recognition criterion to be adopted and imputation principle to be applied on the basis of equitable principle.
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2026-01-23
回到顶部