论死刑的限制

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属院系:

法学院

作者:

张提

导师:

陈忠林

导师单位:

法学院

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

死刑案件;量刑情节;法律适用

摘要:

近几年来,死刑问题一直是我国学术界的一个热门话题,刑法学家们围绕着死刑展开了死刑存废之争,本文旨在比较死刑存废论优劣,从中国当前的政治、经济、文化等基本国情出发,分析中国现阶段的死刑政策一限制死刑的现实性。并从刑事政策、立法、司法、舆论四个角度谈谈如何限制死刑,期望为我国死刑制度的完善提供有效的参考,这也是本文的初衷。本文共分为三大部分。 第一部分我国当前死刑政策分析。重点介绍了死刑存废双方的基本观点,并对基本立场做出简要评价,分析利弊。并在中国现行状态下分析死刑存在的可行性和限制死刑的必要性。 第二部分严格限制死刑的完善建议。主要从刑事政策、立法、司法、媒体舆论四个角度论述如何限制死刑。立法上的限制,笔者论述了消减适用死刑的罪名、进一步限制死刑的适用对象和严格死刑的适用条件。司法角度限制死刑,主要从死刑裁量、刑罚、诉讼程序、法律监督、加强死刑办案力量方面论述。 死刑裁量方面,分析了法定、酌定量刑情节、量刑情节冲突下的司法处理及死刑证据审查规则;死刑刑罚方面,分析现行刑罚体系中存在法定刑幅度过大的问题,提出完善死刑、死缓、无期徒刑的建议;完善诉讼程序,在审理方式方面提出尝试定罪和量刑的两阶段审理制度及针对死刑二审程序中非全案审理的问题提出建言。并提出改进死刑复核程序、严格再审改判死刑、增设死刑救济程序等建议;法律监督方面,主要谈了作为专门的法律监督机关—人民检察院如何在限制死刑中发挥法律监督作用;加强办案力量,主要要从物质、司法人员方面保障限制死刑的适用。 第三部分结论。重申了本文的基本观点。任何一个国家必须从本国现实情况出发去选择死刑的存废。从我国现阶段的具体情况看,死刑的存在是必要的、有意义的,但必须进行严格限制和完善。

学科:

刑法学

提交日期

2026-01-09

引用参考

张提. 论死刑的限制[D]. 西南政法大学,2008.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 论死刑的限制
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 05334120100121
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 张提
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 法学院
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法律硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2008
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 陈忠林
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 法学院
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 死刑案件;量刑情节; 法律适用
  • dc.subject
  • the capital cases;circumstances of punishment;legal applications
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 近几年来,死刑问题一直是我国学术界的一个热门话题,刑法学家们围绕着死刑展开了死刑存废之争,本文旨在比较死刑存废论优劣,从中国当前的政治、经济、文化等基本国情出发,分析中国现阶段的死刑政策一限制死刑的现实性。并从刑事政策、立法、司法、舆论四个角度谈谈如何限制死刑,期望为我国死刑制度的完善提供有效的参考,这也是本文的初衷。本文共分为三大部分。 第一部分我国当前死刑政策分析。重点介绍了死刑存废双方的基本观点,并对基本立场做出简要评价,分析利弊。并在中国现行状态下分析死刑存在的可行性和限制死刑的必要性。 第二部分严格限制死刑的完善建议。主要从刑事政策、立法、司法、媒体舆论四个角度论述如何限制死刑。立法上的限制,笔者论述了消减适用死刑的罪名、进一步限制死刑的适用对象和严格死刑的适用条件。司法角度限制死刑,主要从死刑裁量、刑罚、诉讼程序、法律监督、加强死刑办案力量方面论述。 死刑裁量方面,分析了法定、酌定量刑情节、量刑情节冲突下的司法处理及死刑证据审查规则;死刑刑罚方面,分析现行刑罚体系中存在法定刑幅度过大的问题,提出完善死刑、死缓、无期徒刑的建议;完善诉讼程序,在审理方式方面提出尝试定罪和量刑的两阶段审理制度及针对死刑二审程序中非全案审理的问题提出建言。并提出改进死刑复核程序、严格再审改判死刑、增设死刑救济程序等建议;法律监督方面,主要谈了作为专门的法律监督机关—人民检察院如何在限制死刑中发挥法律监督作用;加强办案力量,主要要从物质、司法人员方面保障限制死刑的适用。 第三部分结论。重申了本文的基本观点。任何一个国家必须从本国现实情况出发去选择死刑的存废。从我国现阶段的具体情况看,死刑的存在是必要的、有意义的,但必须进行严格限制和完善。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The existence of capital punishment has been the hot issue of Chinese legal academia in recent years and many experts in criminal laws are radically quarreling about its necessity. This dissertation is intended to compare with theadvantages and disadvantages of the abolishment form the basic environmentof politics, economics and culture and so on in China and to analyze the current needs of the limited policy of death penalty in today's China. Furthermore, the paper also discussed about the limits of the death penalty from the four perspectives of criminal policies, legislations, jurisdictions and public opinion which is the original intention of the author that desire to provide the effective references to the system of death penalty in China. And the whole text is divided into three parts. Part one is the analysis of the current policy of the death penalty in China which focuses on the two-side issues about the abolishment and makes a briefcomment on the standpoints and merits that could infer the practice of thepunishment and the necessity of the limits. Part two has given the suggestions on the strict limits which mainly elaborate how to constrict the death form the four perspectives mentionedabove. The limits on legislation are arguing about the decreased the applied crimes and narrowed the applied conditions and subjects in death further more.The limits on jurisdictions exhibit the following aspects such as sanctions, punishments, procedures, supervisions and the more resources on these cases. Therefore the limits on sanctions analyze the juridical dealings on the circumstances and their conflicts and the rules of evidences; the limits on punishments analyze the large legal discretions in the current system of punishments and put forward the suggestions about the death penalty, deathpenalty with a two-year reprieve and forced labor and life imprisonment; alsoto prefect the procedures that focus on the two stages of hearing in conviction and calculation and the problem in the non-whole judgment in the secondprocedure. Furthermore, this part set a step to the recommends to improve thepenalty authority procedure, to restrict the amendments in sentences and to1advocate more relieving procedures; the limits on supervisions are talking about the specified mechanism-- how to the people's procuratorates makethe efficiency of in legal supervision; And the more resources on theses cases are mainly the materials and personals to the limits. The last part is the conclusion which reaffirms the basic standpoint of the dissertation that any states must make the choice of the abolishment of deathpenalty based on the current circumstances. So the position of the author isthat the death penalty is necessary and significant but must be strictly limited and perfected in current level in China.
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2026-01-09
回到顶部