全覆盖背景下C市Y部门预算执行审计的案例研究

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

作者:

郭星辰

导师:

郭斌

导师单位:

商学院(监察审计学院)

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

审计全覆盖;部门预算;预算执行审计

摘要:

国家财政是国家治理的基础和重要支柱,预算是其核心环节。部门预算执行审计因 其内生的监测、预防、预警、纠偏及修复功能使其成为国家治理不可或缺的制度工具。 近年来,我国经济社会的高速发展和财政体制改革的持续深入,部门预算执行审计的环 境、对象、内容、方法、模式等都悄然转变。结合近年来国家要求各级政府对部门预算 资金需要进行全覆盖审计。在当前的形势下,如何持续提升部门预算执行审计水平,如 何在审计覆盖面的广度和深度同时发力,进而满足国家对于部门预算执行审计的经济体 检要求,已经成为各地审计机关的重要研究议题。本文以 C 市 Y 部门预算执行审计案 例为研究对象,以部门预算执行审计的各个环节为主线,采用文献研究法和案例分析法 相结合,理论结合审计实务,在审计全覆盖背景下分析部门预算执行审计工作中存在的 问题并提出针对性对策,以期给部门预算执行审计工作提供一些参考。 本文研究主要发现:在审计全覆盖背景下 C 市 Y 部门预算执行审计存在以下五个 方面的问题:(1)从内容上看,横向上的全覆盖的“面”仍不够宽,在绩效方面关注 较少,且审计重点的深度也不够;(2)审计延伸全覆盖未实现。下属事业单位以及区 县审计延伸不足;(3)从方法上看,大数据技术利用不充分。降低了审计效率;(4) 从成效来看,审计整改力度不足,“屡审屡犯”。审计整改不到位,未形成整改合力; (5)从审计的组织方式来看,内外部协调沟通不畅,协同配合不足。使得审计力量未 形成合力。 基于上述问题,C 市 Y 部门预算执行审计要实现审计全覆盖,需要做到以下五个方 面:(1)提升审计深度,加强研究型审计,合理安排审计重点;(2)科学运用技术、 人力,拓宽审计覆盖面;(3)推进大数据审计配套机制建设,提高大数据审计运用水 平;(4)加强审计结果运用,健全审计整改监督制度,促进整改信息公开,形成整改 合力;(5)强化审计内外部协同,要加强审计内外协调沟通,优化现场与非现场审计 协同机制。

学科:

审计*

提交日期

2025-12-31

引用参考

郭星辰. 全覆盖背景下C市Y部门预算执行审计的案例研究[D]. 西南政法大学,2023.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 全覆盖背景下C市Y部门预算执行审计的案例研究
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20200257001146
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 郭星辰
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 商学院(监察审计学院)
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 审计硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2023
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 郭斌
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 商学院(监察审计学院)
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 审计全覆盖;部门预算;预算执行审计
  • dc.subject
  • Department Budget;Budget Implementation Audit;Full Audit Coverage
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 国家财政是国家治理的基础和重要支柱,预算是其核心环节。部门预算执行审计因 其内生的监测、预防、预警、纠偏及修复功能使其成为国家治理不可或缺的制度工具。 近年来,我国经济社会的高速发展和财政体制改革的持续深入,部门预算执行审计的环 境、对象、内容、方法、模式等都悄然转变。结合近年来国家要求各级政府对部门预算 资金需要进行全覆盖审计。在当前的形势下,如何持续提升部门预算执行审计水平,如 何在审计覆盖面的广度和深度同时发力,进而满足国家对于部门预算执行审计的经济体 检要求,已经成为各地审计机关的重要研究议题。本文以 C 市 Y 部门预算执行审计案 例为研究对象,以部门预算执行审计的各个环节为主线,采用文献研究法和案例分析法 相结合,理论结合审计实务,在审计全覆盖背景下分析部门预算执行审计工作中存在的 问题并提出针对性对策,以期给部门预算执行审计工作提供一些参考。 本文研究主要发现:在审计全覆盖背景下 C 市 Y 部门预算执行审计存在以下五个 方面的问题:(1)从内容上看,横向上的全覆盖的“面”仍不够宽,在绩效方面关注 较少,且审计重点的深度也不够;(2)审计延伸全覆盖未实现。下属事业单位以及区 县审计延伸不足;(3)从方法上看,大数据技术利用不充分。降低了审计效率;(4) 从成效来看,审计整改力度不足,“屡审屡犯”。审计整改不到位,未形成整改合力; (5)从审计的组织方式来看,内外部协调沟通不畅,协同配合不足。使得审计力量未 形成合力。 基于上述问题,C 市 Y 部门预算执行审计要实现审计全覆盖,需要做到以下五个方 面:(1)提升审计深度,加强研究型审计,合理安排审计重点;(2)科学运用技术、 人力,拓宽审计覆盖面;(3)推进大数据审计配套机制建设,提高大数据审计运用水 平;(4)加强审计结果运用,健全审计整改监督制度,促进整改信息公开,形成整改 合力;(5)强化审计内外部协同,要加强审计内外协调沟通,优化现场与非现场审计 协同机制。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • National finance is the foundation and important pillar of national governance, and budget is its core link. Department budget execution audit has become an indispensable institutional tool for national governance due to its inherent monitoring, prevention, early warning, correction, and repair functions. In recent years, with the rapid development of China's economy and society and the continuous deepening of financial system reform, the environment, object, content, method, and mode of departmental budget execution audit have quietly changed. In recent years, the state has required governments at all levels to conduct full coverage audits of departmental budget funds. In the current situation, how to continuously improve the level of departmental budget execution audit, and how to exert efforts in both the breadth and depth of audit coverage, in order to meet the national economic examination requirements for departmental budget execution audit, has become an important research topic for audit institutions in various regions. This article takes the budget execution audit case of Y department in C city as the research object, with various links of department budget execution audit as the main line. It combines literature research and case analysis methods, combines theory with audit practice, analyzes the problems in department budget execution audit work under the background of full audit coverage, and proposes targeted countermeasures, in order to provide some reference for department budget execution audit work.The main findings of this study are as follows: In the context of full audit coverage, there are five problems in the budget execution audit of Y department in C city: (1) From the perspective of content, the "scope" of horizontal full coverage is still not wide enough, there is less attention to performance, and the depth of audit focus is also insufficient,; (2) The full coverage of audit extension has not been implemented. Insufficient extension of audit in subordinate institutions and districts/counties; (3) From a methodological perspective, the utilization of big data technology is insufficient. Reduced audit efficiency; (4) From the perspective of effectiveness, the audit rectification efforts are insufficient, resulting in "repeated audits and repeated offenses". Inadequate audit rectification and failure to form a joint effort for rectification; (5) From the perspective of audit organization, internal and 2 万方数据 external coordination and communication are not smooth, and there is insufficient coordination and cooperation. Causing the audit force to not form a joint force. Based on the above issues, in order to achieve full audit coverage in the budget execution audit of Y department in C city, the following five aspects need to be achieved: (1) improving the depth of audit, strengthening research-oriented audit, and reasonably arranging audit priorities; (2) Scientifically apply technology and manpower to expand audit coverage; (3) Promote the construction of supporting mechanisms for big data auditing and improve the level of big data auditing application; (4) Strengthen the application of audit results, improve the audit rectification supervision system, promote the disclosure of rectification information, and form a joint force for rectification; (5) Strengthen internal and external coordination in auditing, strengthen internal and external coordination and communication, and optimize the coordination mechanism between on-site and off-site auditing.
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2025-12-31
回到顶部