专利恶意诉讼的程序法规制

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属院系:

法学院

作者:

张誉箐

导师:

王杏飞

导师单位:

高等研究院

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

专利权;专利恶意诉讼;程序法规制

摘要:

随着知识产权经济时代的来临,知识产权作为企业乃至国家的一项重要生产要素, 成为行业竞争和创新发展的一大驱动力。近年来,我国知识产权事业迅速发展,专利领 域的进步也十分显著。据统计,2019 年我国通过《专利合作条约》(PCT)途径提交的 专利申请达 5.9 万件,跃居世界第一。然而,在如此庞大的专利申请量背后,也出现了 种种问题,专利恶意诉讼便是其中的典型问题之一。一些行为人明知自己所申请的专利 存在问题或瑕疵,利用目前我国专利审查实务中对实用新型和外观设计专利进行非实质 审查的规定,在获得形式合法的专利权利外观后,为谋取抢占市场商机、打压竞争对手 等不正当利益,进而提起专利侵权之诉,即以专利维权的之名,行商业打击之实。这种 披着马甲的专利恶意诉讼行为,不仅侵犯他人的合法权益,妨碍公平竞争和扰乱市场秩 序,也耗费了有限的司法资源。在我国新常态的经济背景之下,应从严思考如何加强司 法对知识产权的保护力度,保障专利权人的合法权益以及怎样有效地遏制专利恶意诉讼 带来的负面影响。结合我国当前面临的经济形势与社会环境,结合具体司法案例和相关 法律条款,进一步探究分析专利恶意诉讼在程序法层面的规制具有显著的现实意义。 本文通过文献研究及对典型司法实务案例、相关法规的梳理分析基础上,对专利恶 意诉讼的基本概念、界定标准进行厘清,从而分析我国专利恶意诉讼程序规制的现状所 呈现出来的问题以及亟需解决的重点,并进一步对专利恶意诉讼程序规制的必要性进行 了探讨,从民事诉讼程序的视角对我国专利恶意诉讼法律规制的完善提出相关建议。本 文一共分为四个部分。 第一部分,主要在对恶意诉讼概念的探析基础上,对专利恶意诉讼的相关基本概念 进行了阐述,为本文的理论架构奠定基础,并对我国近年来专利恶意诉讼典型案件进行 了类别的划分,其次结合实践中的司法案例判决情况勾勒专利恶意诉讼的认定标准。 第二部分,结合相关司法实践、法律及司法解释规定进一步对我国目前专利恶意诉 讼程序规制的现状进行了梳理,总结了程序规制中存在的一些问题,其中包括诉前禁令 程序中对被申请人的利益重视不足、庭前审查程序的不严谨、确定不侵权之诉制度中存 在局限等方面。第三部分,对专利恶意诉讼程序规制的必要性进行了阐述,其中理论必要性包括了 诉权理论及诚实信用原则。此外,从专利恶意诉讼需要更具针对性的规制和专利恶意诉 讼产生的其它负面影响两个层面论证了专利恶意诉讼程序法规制的现实必要性。 第四部分,是全篇的重点,主要针对前文所述专利恶意诉讼程序规制存在的问题, 以民事诉讼程序法的角度,从诉前禁令制度的细化、完善立案和庭前程序的审查、确认 不侵权之诉制度的健全及专利恶意诉讼反赔制度的探索等四个方面提供了完善专利恶 意诉讼法律规制的思考和建议

学科:

诉讼法学

提交日期

2025-12-31

引用参考

张誉箐. 专利恶意诉讼的程序法规制[D]. 西南政法大学,2021.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 专利恶意诉讼的程序法规制
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20180351011155
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 张誉箐
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 法学院
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法学硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2021
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 王杏飞
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 高等研究院
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 专利权;;专利恶意诉讼;;程序法规制
  • dc.subject
  • Patent Right;; Patent Malicious Litigation; ;The Procedural Regulation
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 随着知识产权经济时代的来临,知识产权作为企业乃至国家的一项重要生产要素, 成为行业竞争和创新发展的一大驱动力。近年来,我国知识产权事业迅速发展,专利领 域的进步也十分显著。据统计,2019 年我国通过《专利合作条约》(PCT)途径提交的 专利申请达 5.9 万件,跃居世界第一。然而,在如此庞大的专利申请量背后,也出现了 种种问题,专利恶意诉讼便是其中的典型问题之一。一些行为人明知自己所申请的专利 存在问题或瑕疵,利用目前我国专利审查实务中对实用新型和外观设计专利进行非实质 审查的规定,在获得形式合法的专利权利外观后,为谋取抢占市场商机、打压竞争对手 等不正当利益,进而提起专利侵权之诉,即以专利维权的之名,行商业打击之实。这种 披着马甲的专利恶意诉讼行为,不仅侵犯他人的合法权益,妨碍公平竞争和扰乱市场秩 序,也耗费了有限的司法资源。在我国新常态的经济背景之下,应从严思考如何加强司 法对知识产权的保护力度,保障专利权人的合法权益以及怎样有效地遏制专利恶意诉讼 带来的负面影响。结合我国当前面临的经济形势与社会环境,结合具体司法案例和相关 法律条款,进一步探究分析专利恶意诉讼在程序法层面的规制具有显著的现实意义。 本文通过文献研究及对典型司法实务案例、相关法规的梳理分析基础上,对专利恶 意诉讼的基本概念、界定标准进行厘清,从而分析我国专利恶意诉讼程序规制的现状所 呈现出来的问题以及亟需解决的重点,并进一步对专利恶意诉讼程序规制的必要性进行 了探讨,从民事诉讼程序的视角对我国专利恶意诉讼法律规制的完善提出相关建议。本 文一共分为四个部分。 第一部分,主要在对恶意诉讼概念的探析基础上,对专利恶意诉讼的相关基本概念 进行了阐述,为本文的理论架构奠定基础,并对我国近年来专利恶意诉讼典型案件进行 了类别的划分,其次结合实践中的司法案例判决情况勾勒专利恶意诉讼的认定标准。 第二部分,结合相关司法实践、法律及司法解释规定进一步对我国目前专利恶意诉 讼程序规制的现状进行了梳理,总结了程序规制中存在的一些问题,其中包括诉前禁令 程序中对被申请人的利益重视不足、庭前审查程序的不严谨、确定不侵权之诉制度中存 在局限等方面。第三部分,对专利恶意诉讼程序规制的必要性进行了阐述,其中理论必要性包括了 诉权理论及诚实信用原则。此外,从专利恶意诉讼需要更具针对性的规制和专利恶意诉 讼产生的其它负面影响两个层面论证了专利恶意诉讼程序法规制的现实必要性。 第四部分,是全篇的重点,主要针对前文所述专利恶意诉讼程序规制存在的问题, 以民事诉讼程序法的角度,从诉前禁令制度的细化、完善立案和庭前程序的审查、确认 不侵权之诉制度的健全及专利恶意诉讼反赔制度的探索等四个方面提供了完善专利恶 意诉讼法律规制的思考和建议
  • dc.description.abstract
  • It is doubtless that intellectual property is a crucial production factor of enterprises and even the country. As the era of intellectual property economy is approaching, it has become a major driving force of industrial competition and innovation. In recent years, the patent field shows significant progress under the rapid development of domestic intellectual property. According to statistics, in 2019, fifty-nine thousand Chinese patent applications were submitted through the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT), ranking first in the world.However, in addition to a number of applied patents, there are numerous problems about the patent right, one of which is malicious patent litigation. Some doers realize that there are defects or problems in applied patents. Nevertheless, they obtain the patent authorization according to the patent law without the substantive examination provision for utility model and industrial design patents. Then, in order to seize market opportunities, suppress competitors and seek other unfair interests, they file patent infringement lawsuits. In other words, they carry out commercial attacks in the name of patent protection .This kind of seemingly legal patent malicious litigation brings direct or indirect losses to the legitimate rights and interests of the accused party, damages the normal market competition order, interferes with judicial proceedings seriously and causes the waste of judicial resource. n the background of the China’s new economy normal,it is necessary to protect the legitimate rights and interests of patents holders and prevent the negative consequences of malicious patent litigation,and reduce the negative impact of such patent malicious litigation from the perspective of procedural law in order to protect the patent right. Further studying the procedural law of patent malicious litigation in the current times has unprecedented material significance within our country’s economic atmosphere and social environment. In below paragraph, based on the literature research and the analysis of typical judicial cases, the patent malicious litigation is analyzed from the following aspects: its basic concept, clearing standard definition,as well as the current situation and existing dilemma of patent malicious litigation procedures in China, and the necessity of procedural regulation,etc. After that, related suggestions on perfecting domestic regulation of malicious patent litigation are proposed. The whole paper includes the following four sections. In the first section, based on the foundation of the patent malicious litigation, we define 1 and elaborate elementary theoretical concepts of malicious litigation for our essay. After which we categorize some recent domestic patent malicious litigation cases, then we further our discussion of identification standards on malicious patent litigation which are analyzed jointly with actual judicial cases. In the second section,through reviewing current condition of the regulatory rules of patent malicious prosecution processes while complementing with relevant law and regulation and legal practice, the relevant conundrum involving in the regulation of procedure are successfully summarized. Which includes: the neglect of the defendant’s interests in the pre-lawsuit injunction, the lax pre-trial review procedure as well as the constraints on determining non-infringement litigation action, etc. In the third part, the necessity of regulatory rulings of patent malicious litigation is mainly introduced. In detail, the theoretical necessity involves the theory of litigation right, as well as the principle of good faith . In addition, its practical necessity is also demonstrated from two aspects: the need for more targeted regulation of patent malicious litigation and other negative effects of patent malicious litigation. As for the fourth part, it is the key part in this paper, which proposes some specific suggestions on regulating patent malicious litigation to solve the above mentioned patent problems of malicious litigation procedure regulation from civil procedural law point of view. It mainly includes refining the pre-litigation injunction system, perfecting the examination of filing and pre-trial procedure, as well as the litigation system of affirming non-infringement of patent right and establishing a compensation mechanism against patent malicious litigation.
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2025-12-31
回到顶部