论证券领域职务犯罪的现状及预防对策

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属院系:

法学院

作者:

程静

导师:

任惠华

导师单位:

刑事侦查学院

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

证券领域;职务犯罪;犯罪预防;证券监管;预防对策

摘要:

证券行业,作为现代经济的要素之一,与国民经济的发展息息相关。 安全正常的证券交易秩序为市场经济健康、快速、稳定的发展提供有力的 支持。但是近年来,我国证券领域的职务犯罪时有发生,给国家造成巨大 损失,对经济秩序构成严重威胁。本文通过对 2003 年以来全国典型的十 余起证券犯罪案件的分析,研究证券领域职务犯罪的发生规律、原因、特 点及其危害,旨在加强证券监管、完善证券监管体制,探寻有效的预防措 施,以期为检察机关的职务犯罪预防工作实践提供有益的支持。 本文共分三个部分。 第一部分,明确证券领域职务犯罪的概念和特点。所谓证券领域职务 犯罪,是指证券机构国家工作人员利用职务上的便利实施的非法牟取经济 利益,或滥用职权、不正确履行职责的、依法应受刑罚处罚的行为。它包 括两个方面的内容:一是刑法规定的证券犯罪中,可能由国家工作人员实 施的各种犯罪;二是可能由证券机构国家工作人员实施的其他职务犯罪。 第二部分,考察证券领域职务犯罪的原因。本文阐述了证券领域职务 犯罪的三大社会危害性,即证券职务犯罪造成国有资产大量流失、资本外 逃;扰乱正常的证券交易秩序,诱发市场危机以及破坏公平竞争的市场环 境,不利于社会主义市场经济体制的完善。深入地分析了证券职务犯罪的 主要诱因,包括权力对证券稀缺资源的垄断以及我国证券监管体制自身的 缺陷所导致监管效率低下和监管实效较差等主要原因。 第三部分,论述证券领域职务犯罪的预防对策。预防职务犯罪有其广 义和狭义之分,本文从广义犯罪预防的角度,对我国现行证券监管体制进 行反思后提出二项防范措施。从狭义犯罪预防的角度分析,检察机关查处 职务犯罪和预防职务犯罪是紧密相连的。打击是对已然犯罪的惩治,是治 标之举;预防则侧重于未雨绸缪防患于未然,是治本之策。证券领域职务 犯罪的预防对策,是指通过事前预防和事后惩治两条途径,以控制证券领域职务犯罪发生的策略。职务犯罪的产生与多元因素有关,其预防对策也 必须是多元的,不仅要有法律对策,而且还须有政治、经济、监督、思想 等多方面组合而成的社会对策。

学科:

刑法学

提交日期

2025-12-04

引用参考

程静. 论证券领域职务犯罪的现状及预防对策[D]. 西南政法大学,2008.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 论证券领域职务犯罪的现状及预防对策
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 05334110100518
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 程静
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 法学院
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法律硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2008
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 任惠华
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 刑事侦查学院
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 证券领域;职务犯罪;犯罪预防;证券监管;预防对策
  • dc.subject
  • Securities domain;Crime committed by taking advantage of duty;Crime prevention;Securities supervising and managing,;Prevention countermeasures.
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 证券行业,作为现代经济的要素之一,与国民经济的发展息息相关。 安全正常的证券交易秩序为市场经济健康、快速、稳定的发展提供有力的 支持。但是近年来,我国证券领域的职务犯罪时有发生,给国家造成巨大 损失,对经济秩序构成严重威胁。本文通过对 2003 年以来全国典型的十 余起证券犯罪案件的分析,研究证券领域职务犯罪的发生规律、原因、特 点及其危害,旨在加强证券监管、完善证券监管体制,探寻有效的预防措 施,以期为检察机关的职务犯罪预防工作实践提供有益的支持。 本文共分三个部分。 第一部分,明确证券领域职务犯罪的概念和特点。所谓证券领域职务 犯罪,是指证券机构国家工作人员利用职务上的便利实施的非法牟取经济 利益,或滥用职权、不正确履行职责的、依法应受刑罚处罚的行为。它包 括两个方面的内容:一是刑法规定的证券犯罪中,可能由国家工作人员实 施的各种犯罪;二是可能由证券机构国家工作人员实施的其他职务犯罪。 第二部分,考察证券领域职务犯罪的原因。本文阐述了证券领域职务 犯罪的三大社会危害性,即证券职务犯罪造成国有资产大量流失、资本外 逃;扰乱正常的证券交易秩序,诱发市场危机以及破坏公平竞争的市场环 境,不利于社会主义市场经济体制的完善。深入地分析了证券职务犯罪的 主要诱因,包括权力对证券稀缺资源的垄断以及我国证券监管体制自身的 缺陷所导致监管效率低下和监管实效较差等主要原因。 第三部分,论述证券领域职务犯罪的预防对策。预防职务犯罪有其广 义和狭义之分,本文从广义犯罪预防的角度,对我国现行证券监管体制进 行反思后提出二项防范措施。从狭义犯罪预防的角度分析,检察机关查处 职务犯罪和预防职务犯罪是紧密相连的。打击是对已然犯罪的惩治,是治 标之举;预防则侧重于未雨绸缪防患于未然,是治本之策。证券领域职务 犯罪的预防对策,是指通过事前预防和事后惩治两条途径,以控制证券领域职务犯罪发生的策略。职务犯罪的产生与多元因素有关,其预防对策也 必须是多元的,不仅要有法律对策,而且还须有政治、经济、监督、思想 等多方面组合而成的社会对策。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The securities industry, as one of the essential factors for modern economy, is closely linked with the national economy development. The safe and normal securities transaction order will provide powerful support for nurturing healthy, fast, and stable development of the market economy. But in recent years, crimes committed by taking advantages of duty occurred now and then in our country‘s securities domain, which have made great loss to the country and have seriously imperiled the economic order. In this article, the author, by case analysis of more than ten typical securities crimes since 2003, means to probe into the crime committed by taking advantages of duty in the securities domain to find out the generating rule, the reason, the characteristics and the harm, hoping to strengthen securities industry’s supervising and managing, to improve the securities supervising and managing system, to explore the effective preventive measures, and thus to provide beneficial support for the procuratorial agency's prevention practice against crime committed by taking advantages of duty in the securities domain. The whole article is divided into three parts: In the first part, the author defines concept and the characteristics of crime committed by taking advantages of duty in the securities domain. The so-called crime committed by taking advantages of duty in the securities domain refers to these behaviors: public servant in the securities organizations illegally take advantages of their duty and seek the economic interest, or fulfill the responsibility in abuse of power, or incorrectly fulfill responsibility which in accordance with the law should be punished by criminal law. It includes two aspects: One refers to the securities crimes stipulated in the criminal law, which could be committed by the public servant. The other refers to other duty related crimes which could be committed by the public servant working in thesecurities organization. In the second part, the author elaborates why crimes committed by taking advantages of duty in securities domain occur. In view of the author, crimes committed by taking advantages of duty will imperil our society in three aspects, namely causing massive losses of the state assets as well as illegal outflows of the capital; making disturbance of the regular securities transaction order as well as inducing the market crisis; destructing fair market competition as well as impairing the improvement of socialist market economy system. Then the author thoroughly analyzes the main causes including the power’s monopoly of the scarce securities resources; low efficiency and bad actual effect of supervision and management caused by flaws of the securities supervising and managing system etc. In the third part, the author puts forward prevention countermeasures for the crime committed by taking advantages of duty in the securities domain. The prevention of crime committed by taking advantages of duty in the securities domain can be interpreted either in generalized sense or in narrow sense. This article analyzes firstly from the generalized sense, proposing two countermeasures after introspection on our country’s present securities supervising and managing system. Then from the narrow sense the author analyzes that the procuratorial agency’s work of investigating and punishing the crime committed by taking advantages of duty is closely connected with that of preventing the crime committed by taking advantages of duty. The work of investigating and punishing which is to punish convinced crime is a temporary solution, while the work of prevention which puts emphasis on countermeasures against possible troubles is a permanent solution. The prevention countermeasures in this article refer to strategies to control the occurrence of the crime by prevention in anticipation and punishment afterwards. Causes of the crime committed by taking advantages of duty are influenced by multi-dimensional factors, therefore the preventioncountermeasure should also be multi-dimensional. That is, the countermeasures are essentially combination of not only the legal countermeasure, but also the social countermeasure which has elements of politics, the economy, the supervision and the ideas, etc.
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2025-12-04
回到顶部