股东优先购买权的现实考量

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属院系:

法学院

作者:

潘先忠

导师:

韦忠语

导师单位:

民商法学院(知识产权学院)

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

股东优先购买权;同等条件;侵权认定;立法完善

摘要:

股东优先购买权制度是我国公司法立法一大亮点,该制度既能保护转让股权股东的利益,又能切实保护拟接受股权股东和其他股东的利益。在实践中发挥着重要的作用。然而,由于立法的疏漏,导致对该项制度的认识不一,造成理论和实践上的混乱。基于此,本文试图对该项制度进行一点初步的探讨。全文共分六部分: 第一部分,文章以两个公司法上股东优先购买权的案例为切入点,案例反映出的是现行公司法对股东优先购买权规定的疏漏之处,现行立法未能真正解决。从案例引出作者对于股东优先购买权的相关问题的研究,也作为作者理论探讨的进路。 第二部分,首先摆出了股东优先购买权最基本的原理,诸如股东优先购买权的概念、性质和立法依据,对这些最基本问题的剖析,可以更深入地认识股东优先购买权的本质,也为更深层次的论述作好理论铺垫。 第三部分,针对案例所反映的问题,依次对股东优先购买权所涉及的同意权、同等条件和答复等概念进行了深入的剖析,作者认为这几个概念是理解、把握股东优先购买权的关键,认识不了,就必然会导致理论的混乱和对该项制度的肤浅把握。 第四部分,侧重对股东优先购买权的行使期限及其性质予以阐述,认为股东优先购买权作为一种权利也是有期限限制的,应适用除斥期间的规定,方能保护其他股东和转让股权股东的合法权益。 第五部分,对实践中常发生的侵犯股东优先购买权的认定要件和救济措施进行分析,以传统的侵权理论分析其构成要件,提出了立法的救济措施,并认为对未经过过半数股东同意的股权转让合同的效力认定是救济措施的应有之义。 第六部分,阐述股东优先购买权在立法、司法和实践方面的缺陷,并重点剖析立法方面的不足以及所造成的混乱,并提出了立法完善的具体建议。

学科:

民商法学

提交日期

2025-12-04

引用参考

潘先忠. 股东优先购买权的现实考量[D]. 西南政法大学,2008.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 股东优先购买权的现实考量
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 05554130100611
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 潘先忠
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 法学院
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法律硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2008
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 韦忠语
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 民商法学院(知识产权学院)
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 股东优先购买权 ;同等条件;侵权认定 ;立法完善
  • dc.subject
  • Shareholder's Preemption;the same conditions;identification of the infringement;legislative perfection
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 股东优先购买权制度是我国公司法立法一大亮点,该制度既能保护转让股权股东的利益,又能切实保护拟接受股权股东和其他股东的利益。在实践中发挥着重要的作用。然而,由于立法的疏漏,导致对该项制度的认识不一,造成理论和实践上的混乱。基于此,本文试图对该项制度进行一点初步的探讨。全文共分六部分: 第一部分,文章以两个公司法上股东优先购买权的案例为切入点,案例反映出的是现行公司法对股东优先购买权规定的疏漏之处,现行立法未能真正解决。从案例引出作者对于股东优先购买权的相关问题的研究,也作为作者理论探讨的进路。 第二部分,首先摆出了股东优先购买权最基本的原理,诸如股东优先购买权的概念、性质和立法依据,对这些最基本问题的剖析,可以更深入地认识股东优先购买权的本质,也为更深层次的论述作好理论铺垫。 第三部分,针对案例所反映的问题,依次对股东优先购买权所涉及的同意权、同等条件和答复等概念进行了深入的剖析,作者认为这几个概念是理解、把握股东优先购买权的关键,认识不了,就必然会导致理论的混乱和对该项制度的肤浅把握。 第四部分,侧重对股东优先购买权的行使期限及其性质予以阐述,认为股东优先购买权作为一种权利也是有期限限制的,应适用除斥期间的规定,方能保护其他股东和转让股权股东的合法权益。 第五部分,对实践中常发生的侵犯股东优先购买权的认定要件和救济措施进行分析,以传统的侵权理论分析其构成要件,提出了立法的救济措施,并认为对未经过过半数股东同意的股权转让合同的效力认定是救济措施的应有之义。 第六部分,阐述股东优先购买权在立法、司法和实践方面的缺陷,并重点剖析立法方面的不足以及所造成的混乱,并提出了立法完善的具体建议。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Playing an important role in practice, Shareholder’s Preemption is a highlight of Chinese corporation law in respect that it is the protection of not only shareholder's benefit when stockholder's rights are transferred but also the interests of the shareholder who plans to accept the stockholder's rights and other shareholders. Nevertheless, the legislative oversights and omissions leads to the different understanding of such system that results in the confusion in both theory and practice on the basis of which this disquisition makes an attempt to carry on the elementary exploration. This treatise consists of the following six chapters: Two corporation law cases of them being the breakthrough point, the first chapter focuses on the study of the related issues of Shareholder’s Preemption, reflecting the oversights and omissions of the present corporation law stipulating the Shareholder’s Preemption, which is also regarded as the theoretical approach. In the second chapter, the enumeration of such essential factors of Shareholder’s Preemption as the most fundamental principles, concepts, characteristics, and the legislative mandate makes the theoretical preparation for the following deeper exposition. The third chapter makes an in-depth assay of such concepts, the key points of understanding the rights, as the consent rights, the same condition, and answer in relative to Shareholder’s Preemption by virtue of the issues reflected by two cases. Otherwise, it is inevitable that the confusion to differently understand the theory and the superficial comprehension of the system arise. The fourth chapter focuses on the elaboration of the time limit set to exercise the Shareholder's Preemption as well as its nature, concluding that as a kind of right, the preemptive rights of purchase also have a time limit. Therefore, the legal rights of transfer of shares and other shareholders will not be protected unless the stipulation made in Scheduled Period applies to it. The fifth chapter analyzes the identification elements and relief measures about infringing shareholder's preemption which often occurs in practice. In this chapter we also hold that affirming the validity of share-transfer contract which 2 is not agreed upon by more than half of the shareholders is also essential content of relief measures. The sixth chapter is centered on the deficiency in legislation for Shareholder's Preemption and the consequent confusion. The specific suggestions is also put forward to perfect the concerning legislation in this chapter.
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2025-12-04
回到顶部