职务犯罪中的反侦查行为及其对策研究

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属院系:

刑事侦查学院

作者:

孟荣飞

导师:

任惠华

导师单位:

刑事侦查学院

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

职务犯罪;反侦查;行为;防控;侦查;对策

摘要:

进入新世纪以来,我国社会经济得到全面发展,作为社会现象之一的职务犯罪也发生着各种变化,这些变化包括犯罪的隐蔽性越来越强、犯罪黑数越来越高、涉及财物越来越大、犯罪串案比例增多等,要求我们对职务犯罪的侦查加快理论研究步伐,以促进侦查效率的提高。 现代职务犯罪的高智能和高科技等特点决定了职务犯罪的侦查与反侦查将 在一定范围内保持高强度的对抗,使得我们对职务犯罪中的反侦查行为及其对策的研究显得极其重要和紧迫。 本文立足现阶段职务犯罪的侦查实践和理论研究,运用了举例、对比、归纳等论证方法,试图从反侦查行为入手,通过进一步分析职务犯罪的反侦查行为的形成原因、特点、类型以及发展趋势,最后结合现阶段职务犯罪的侦查困境提出反侦查行为的防控对策和侦查对策。除引言外本文共分为三个部分。 第一部分,职务犯罪反侦查行为的概述。概念是反映事物本质属性的思维形式,概念要明确就是要明确概念的内涵和外延,而定义和划分是我们明确概念的基本方法,所以本部分首先对反侦查行为的概念做了一个定义和划分,同时描述了反侦查行为的表现形式。然后对考察职务犯罪活动中反侦查行为的现实意义做了分析,明确了本文的研究价值和研究目的,具体而言主要是有利于揭示和把握反侦查行为的规律特点;有利于发挥职务犯罪侦查中技术侦查的作用,为技术人员的判断提供依据;有利于丰富反侦查理论体系,为进一步促进职务犯罪领域反侦查对策的研究提供依据;有利于于提高侦查人员的警觉性和办案水平,威慑犯罪,提高破案率以及有利于促进预防职务犯罪立法进程。最后,对职务犯罪的侦查行为与反侦查的辩证关系的分析,即一方面,侦查与反侦查作为矛盾的对立面,各自的发展都要受到对方的约束,另一方面,侦查与反侦查的发展互为前提和基础,缺一不可,从而进一步理清了侦查行为与反侦查行为两者的关系,也为下面做进一步的研究打下基础。 第二部分,职务犯罪中的反侦查行为分析。这是本文的主干部分,与上一部分相比,本部分已不拘泥于仅仅分析一般的反侦查行为,而是主要是侧重于对职务犯罪领域的反侦查行为进行更深层次的分析。首先,通过主观和客观两个方面西南政法大学硕士学位论文 2 分析了职务犯罪中反侦查行为的形成原因。主观方面主要是按照主体的不同进行分类分析,职务犯罪行为人方面的主观原因有:趋利避害与畏罪惧罚心理、文化与智力因素、侥幸过关与负隅顽抗心理;证人方面的主观原因主要有:亲友关系因素、自我安全保障需要、同情心理、小团体利益因素等。客观方面主要有:社会舆论的因素、社会身份和关系网的因素、侦查机关的侦查能力因素、案件的自身特点因素、司法腐败因素等。其次,对职务犯罪活动中反侦查行为的特点进行了进一步分析,明确了职务犯罪活动中反侦查行为的特点,主要可以归结为:反侦查行为与职务犯罪主体的关联性、反侦查行为与职务犯罪侦查行为的关联性、反侦查行为的主动性和对抗性、反侦查行为的科技含量与智力水平、反侦查行为的隐蔽性和迷惑性等。再次,对侦查活动有较大实际意义的职务犯罪反侦查行为进行了类型划分。主要有个体性反侦查行为与组织性反侦查行为、消极性的反侦查行为和积极性的反侦查行为、职务犯罪不同阶段中的反侦查行为,通过类型划分使职务犯罪的反侦查行为更清晰,有利于在侦查工作进行应用。最后,对现阶段职务犯罪反侦查行为的发展趋势做了个分析和概括。总的来讲,主要有:犯罪行为人的反侦查意识日益增强、反侦查手段的专业化、科学化趋势明显、反侦查逐渐从消极性的反侦查向积极性的反侦查转变、反侦查行为的主动性加强、反侦查行为的主体出现高智商、高社会地位的趋势等。 第三部分,职务犯罪反侦查行为的对策研究。这是本文的最后一部分也是本文的中心。首先,从侦查权的行使问题和侦查模式的缺陷两个方面入手对我国职务犯罪领域的侦查困境做了分析。侦查权的行使方面主要有:侦查权的配置缺乏统一性、侦查权的行使缺乏应有的独立性、侦查权配置不科学,侦查手段单一、检察机关没有技术侦查权等四个方面,揭示出我国现阶段职务犯罪侦查领域的侦查权行使上的问题。我国实行职权主义侦查模式,但是也存在机构设置不合理和职权主义的高效率没有体现出来等问题。其次,探讨了职务犯罪反侦查行为的防控对策。分三个方面来阐述,第一是加强职务犯罪反侦查行为的道德防控,第二是加强配置职务犯罪侦查权的制度保障,第三是加强职务犯罪反侦查行为的法律防控。道德、体制、法律三个方面起头并进才能真正对职务犯罪的反侦查行为有一个有效的遏制。最后,结合我国的侦查实践和理论研究状况,根据职务犯罪反侦查行为的特征,提出了应对职务犯罪反侦查行为的侦查对策。主要有:因敌制宜,将计就计;按兵不动,因势利导;设置障碍,迫其合作;采取措施,限制活职务犯罪中的反侦查行为及其对策研究 3 动;技术侦查,突破僵局;金融手段、控制财产;加强合作,形成合力等七个方面。

学科:

侦查学

提交日期

2025-12-03

引用参考

孟荣飞. 职务犯罪中的反侦查行为及其对策研究[D]. 西南政法大学,2009.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 职务犯罪中的反侦查行为及其对策研究
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20060301200381
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 孟荣飞
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 刑事侦查学院
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法律硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2009
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 任惠华
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 刑事侦查学院
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 职务犯罪;反侦查;行为;防控;侦查;对策
  • dc.subject
  • Crime by Taking Advantage of Duty;Counter Investigation;Behavior;Investigate;Prevent and Control; Countermeasure
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 进入新世纪以来,我国社会经济得到全面发展,作为社会现象之一的职务犯罪也发生着各种变化,这些变化包括犯罪的隐蔽性越来越强、犯罪黑数越来越高、涉及财物越来越大、犯罪串案比例增多等,要求我们对职务犯罪的侦查加快理论研究步伐,以促进侦查效率的提高。 现代职务犯罪的高智能和高科技等特点决定了职务犯罪的侦查与反侦查将 在一定范围内保持高强度的对抗,使得我们对职务犯罪中的反侦查行为及其对策的研究显得极其重要和紧迫。 本文立足现阶段职务犯罪的侦查实践和理论研究,运用了举例、对比、归纳等论证方法,试图从反侦查行为入手,通过进一步分析职务犯罪的反侦查行为的形成原因、特点、类型以及发展趋势,最后结合现阶段职务犯罪的侦查困境提出反侦查行为的防控对策和侦查对策。除引言外本文共分为三个部分。 第一部分,职务犯罪反侦查行为的概述。概念是反映事物本质属性的思维形式,概念要明确就是要明确概念的内涵和外延,而定义和划分是我们明确概念的基本方法,所以本部分首先对反侦查行为的概念做了一个定义和划分,同时描述了反侦查行为的表现形式。然后对考察职务犯罪活动中反侦查行为的现实意义做了分析,明确了本文的研究价值和研究目的,具体而言主要是有利于揭示和把握反侦查行为的规律特点;有利于发挥职务犯罪侦查中技术侦查的作用,为技术人员的判断提供依据;有利于丰富反侦查理论体系,为进一步促进职务犯罪领域反侦查对策的研究提供依据;有利于于提高侦查人员的警觉性和办案水平,威慑犯罪,提高破案率以及有利于促进预防职务犯罪立法进程。最后,对职务犯罪的侦查行为与反侦查的辩证关系的分析,即一方面,侦查与反侦查作为矛盾的对立面,各自的发展都要受到对方的约束,另一方面,侦查与反侦查的发展互为前提和基础,缺一不可,从而进一步理清了侦查行为与反侦查行为两者的关系,也为下面做进一步的研究打下基础。 第二部分,职务犯罪中的反侦查行为分析。这是本文的主干部分,与上一部分相比,本部分已不拘泥于仅仅分析一般的反侦查行为,而是主要是侧重于对职务犯罪领域的反侦查行为进行更深层次的分析。首先,通过主观和客观两个方面西南政法大学硕士学位论文 2 分析了职务犯罪中反侦查行为的形成原因。主观方面主要是按照主体的不同进行分类分析,职务犯罪行为人方面的主观原因有:趋利避害与畏罪惧罚心理、文化与智力因素、侥幸过关与负隅顽抗心理;证人方面的主观原因主要有:亲友关系因素、自我安全保障需要、同情心理、小团体利益因素等。客观方面主要有:社会舆论的因素、社会身份和关系网的因素、侦查机关的侦查能力因素、案件的自身特点因素、司法腐败因素等。其次,对职务犯罪活动中反侦查行为的特点进行了进一步分析,明确了职务犯罪活动中反侦查行为的特点,主要可以归结为:反侦查行为与职务犯罪主体的关联性、反侦查行为与职务犯罪侦查行为的关联性、反侦查行为的主动性和对抗性、反侦查行为的科技含量与智力水平、反侦查行为的隐蔽性和迷惑性等。再次,对侦查活动有较大实际意义的职务犯罪反侦查行为进行了类型划分。主要有个体性反侦查行为与组织性反侦查行为、消极性的反侦查行为和积极性的反侦查行为、职务犯罪不同阶段中的反侦查行为,通过类型划分使职务犯罪的反侦查行为更清晰,有利于在侦查工作进行应用。最后,对现阶段职务犯罪反侦查行为的发展趋势做了个分析和概括。总的来讲,主要有:犯罪行为人的反侦查意识日益增强、反侦查手段的专业化、科学化趋势明显、反侦查逐渐从消极性的反侦查向积极性的反侦查转变、反侦查行为的主动性加强、反侦查行为的主体出现高智商、高社会地位的趋势等。 第三部分,职务犯罪反侦查行为的对策研究。这是本文的最后一部分也是本文的中心。首先,从侦查权的行使问题和侦查模式的缺陷两个方面入手对我国职务犯罪领域的侦查困境做了分析。侦查权的行使方面主要有:侦查权的配置缺乏统一性、侦查权的行使缺乏应有的独立性、侦查权配置不科学,侦查手段单一、检察机关没有技术侦查权等四个方面,揭示出我国现阶段职务犯罪侦查领域的侦查权行使上的问题。我国实行职权主义侦查模式,但是也存在机构设置不合理和职权主义的高效率没有体现出来等问题。其次,探讨了职务犯罪反侦查行为的防控对策。分三个方面来阐述,第一是加强职务犯罪反侦查行为的道德防控,第二是加强配置职务犯罪侦查权的制度保障,第三是加强职务犯罪反侦查行为的法律防控。道德、体制、法律三个方面起头并进才能真正对职务犯罪的反侦查行为有一个有效的遏制。最后,结合我国的侦查实践和理论研究状况,根据职务犯罪反侦查行为的特征,提出了应对职务犯罪反侦查行为的侦查对策。主要有:因敌制宜,将计就计;按兵不动,因势利导;设置障碍,迫其合作;采取措施,限制活职务犯罪中的反侦查行为及其对策研究 3 动;技术侦查,突破僵局;金融手段、控制财产;加强合作,形成合力等七个方面。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Since the new century, our country’s economy has been developed a lot. Also various changes happen in the crime by taking advantage of duty as to be one of social phenomenon. The changes include the number of undiscovered crime by taking advantage of duty being higher and the number of property relating to the crime being higher and the number of crime in which the suspects confederate being higher. All of the above tells us that our pace for researching investigation theory should be quicker in the purpose of promoting the efficiency of investigating. Characteristics such as high intelligence and technology in the crime by taking advantage of duty make the high-strength confrontation of investigation and counter-investigation will be maintained within certain range which makes the research of the counter-investigation behavior of the crime by taking advantage of duty and its countermeasure extremely important and pressing. This paper, based on the theory and practice of the crime by taking advantage of duty at the present stage, uses the means of citing, contrasting and induction. It tries to start with counter-investigation behavior. And then it analyzes the cause; feature; types and development tendency of the counter-investigation behavior of the crime by taking advantage of duty. Lastly, according to the investigation difficulties of the crime by taking advantage of duty at the present stage, the paper puts forth prevention and control and investigation countermeasure for counter-investigation behavior of the crime by taking advantage of duty. This paper falls into three sections except preface. Section one, the overview of counter-investigation behavior of the crime by taking advantage of duty. The concept is an attribute form of thought of nature reflect object. In order to make a concept clear, we need to make connotation and extension be clear. Defining and dividing are the fundamental methods to make a concept clear. So this section falls into three parts to discuss. First of all, it defines and divides the concept of the counter-investigation behavior. And describes the manifestation of counter-investigation behavior. Second, it analyzes the significance of researching the counter-investigation behavior of the crime by taking advantage of duty. Specifically, the significance is as follows. Be beneficial to revealing and grasping concretely mainly oppose the law characteristic investigating behavior; The effect beneficial to 职务犯罪中的反侦查行为及其对策研究 5 bringing crime by taking advantage of duty into play investigating the middle technology investigating, is that provides a basis for technician's judgment; Beneficial to enriching on the contrary investigate theory system , provide a basis to boosting the crime by taking advantage of duty field opposing the go into investigating a countermeasure further; Beneficial to horizontal , terrorizing committing a crime in improving the alertness investigating a personnel and handling case , improve the rate of detection and the legislation course beneficial to promoting taking precautions against crime by taking advantage of duty. In the end, it analyzes dialectical relation between investigation of the crime by taking advantage of duty and its counter-investigation behavior. On one side, investigation and counter-investigation, as to be two Oppositions of one contradiction, each one’s development is bound by the other side. On the other side, investigation is the precondition for and the basis of counter-investigation, which can not be separated. Based on the clear relationship between investigation and counter-investigation, we can research the theory further. Section two, the analysis of counter-investigation behavior of the crime by taking advantage of duty. As to be main part of the paper, it is different from section one that this section focus on deeper analysis of counter-investigation behavior of the crime by taking advantage of duty. Firstly, it analyzes the reason of counter-investigation behavior of the crime by taking advantage of duty via two aspects including subjectivity and the objective. Subjective cause about suspect include: draw on the advantages and avoid disadvantages and dread punishment for one’s crime; civilization and intelligence; fluke mind and put up a last-ditch resistance; Subjective cause about witness include: Kith and kin concerns factor , oneself insurance need , factor feeling pity for mentality , personal benefit etc. Objective aspect mainly include: Public opinion factor, society dignity and factor of the relation network, oneself characteristic factor investigating the ability factors, law cases, judiciary sepsis factor of investigative organ etc. Secondly, it analyses the characteristic of counter-investigation behavior of the crime by taking advantage of duty. Specifically, it can be fall into five parts: the relationship with the subject of the crime by taking advantage of duty; the relationship with the investigation behavior; initiative and opposability of the crime by taking advantage of duty; Technology content and intelligence level; elusive and confuse. Thirdly, it analyses the development tendency of counter-investigation behavior of the crime by taking advantage of duty. Section three, the analysis of countermeasure of counter-investigation behavior 西南政法大学硕士学位论文 6 of the crime by taking advantage of duty. This is the central part of the paper as well as the last. Firstly, it analyzes the investigation difficulties of the crime by taking advantage of duty at the present stage which includes two parts: the problem of right-exercise of investigation; the defect of investigation mode. The problem of right-exercise of investigation includes: The allocation of investigating right is short of unity; exercising investigating right is short of due independent character; investigate right allocation block of wood science, investigate means are single; investigation organs do not have a technology investigating right. Our country uses power-based model of criminal procedure structure, otherwise it has some defects, such as organization structuring is unreasonable; ineffective. Secondly, it discusses the prevention and control countermeasure of counter-investigation behavior of the crime by taking advantage of duty, including morality preventing and controlling; system preventing and controlling and legal preventing and controlling. Thirdly, according to the investigation practice and theory researching and the characteristic of counter-investigation behavior of the crime by taking advantage of duty, this part put forward some countermeasure of counter-investigation behavior of the crime by taking advantage of duty. First one, suit our measures to differing conditions in terms of criminal and counterplot. Second one, halt the troops and wait, measures changed with the changed circumstance. Third one, Interpose an obstacle, force the criminal to cooperate. Fourth one, adopt measures to restrict the activity. Fifth one, using technical investigate to breaks deadlock. Sixth one, using finance means to control property. Seventh one, reinforce cooperation to form the resultant force.
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2025-12-03
回到顶部