行政许可设定中自由裁量问题研究

成果信息

DC信息

传播影响力

归属院系：

行政法学院（纪检监察学院）

作者：

江祚穆

导师：

刘艺

导师单位：

行政法学院（纪检监察学院）

学位：

硕士

语种：

中文

关键词：

许可设定;自由裁量;公正性;利益代表理论

摘要：

本文是运用美国行政法利益代表理论解决中国许可设定中自由裁量问题的一次尝试。关于自由裁量问题的定位，不同的理论有不同的看法，本文考察了美国行政法中的自由裁量问题演变历史，确定中国行政许可中自由裁量问题是公正性问题，并发现行政许可中自由裁量问题可以许可设定阶段到有效解决。所以许可设定中的自由裁量问题与行政许可中自由裁量问题成为论证的重点。经过论证，可以确定许可设定中的自由裁量问题就是行政许可自由裁量问题。最后本文参照利益代表理论的方法，结合中国立法体制的实际情况和许可法的相关条文，对许可设定中自由裁量问题的解决提出了自己的建议。分析行政许可中自由裁量问题要参考美国行政法行政自由裁量权相关理论和德国行政自由裁量相关理论。中国行政许可中自由裁量问题在许可设定中解决是适宜的，有权力体制方面的原因，具体设计倒司法审查范围和许可设定权限.也因为许可设定自身在解决许可自由裁量方面的优势，行政许可中自由裁量问题实际上是在许可设定中公正地分配利益的问题。事实上，通过考察美国行政法自由裁量问题嬗变的历程，我们可以确定，公正性是许可设定中自由裁量问题的主要部分.本文第一部分主要是表明许可设定中自由裁量的形式含义和实质含义。第二部分则是确定许可设定中自由裁量问题的实质是哪一个问题。第三部分是对美国行政法中解决公正性问题的理论——利益代表理论进行简单介绍。第四部分则是根据中国目前的立法体制作一些解决许可设定中自由裁量问题的方法的建议。本文的结构是为了体现许可设定中自由裁量的关注点是公正性问题,所以采用美国行政自由裁量问题的相关理论来印证这种判定是合理的,如果读者足够细心的话,在美国行政法中,行政许可中的行政自由裁量问题的发生过两次转变,与行政许可关系密切的是公正性问题.这样,对中国行政许可中自由问题的定位就避开了"有效限制行政权力 "之类的定位.认为行政自由裁量问题是有效限制权力的问题的判断,更加适用于于行政管制行为而非行政许可行为. 本文并不着意去介绍许可设定的立法属性或者行政立法属性。立法自由裁量并不是许可设定中自由裁量需要重点强调的一面.作者想做的是如何解决行政许可中自由裁量问题——公正性问题，以及为这些方法的有效性提供论证，这些就是本文第四部分内容。

学科：

宪法学与行政法学

提交日期：

2025-11-21

引用参考：

江祚穆. 行政许可设定中自由裁量问题研究[D]. 西南政法大学,2009.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

dc.title
行政许可设定中自由裁量问题研究

dc.contributor.schoolno
20060301030420

dc.contributor.author
江祚穆

dc.contributor.affiliation
行政法学院（纪检监察学院）

dc.contributor.degree
硕士

dc.contributor.childdegree
法学硕士

dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
西南政法大学

dc.identifier.year
2009

dc.contributor.advisor
刘艺

dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
行政法学院（纪检监察学院）

dc.language.iso
中文

dc.subject
许可设定 ;自由裁量;公正性;利益代表理论

dc.subject
: permission settings;discretion ;Impartiality;Represent the interests of the theory

dc.description.abstract
本文是运用美国行政法利益代表理论解决中国许可设定中自由裁量问题的一次尝试。关于自由裁量问题的定位，不同的理论有不同的看法，本文考察了美国行政法中的自由裁量问题演变历史，确定中国行政许可中自由裁量问题是公正性问题，并发现行政许可中自由裁量问题可以许可设定阶段到有效解决。所以许可设定中的自由裁量问题与行政许可中自由裁量问题成为论证的重点。经过论证，可以确定许可设定中的自由裁量问题就是行政许可自由裁量问题。最后本文参照利益代表理论的方法，结合中国立法体制的实际情况和许可法的相关条文，对许可设定中自由裁量问题的解决提出了自己的建议。分析行政许可中自由裁量问题要参考美国行政法行政自由裁量权相关理论和德国行政自由裁量相关理论。中国行政许可中自由裁量问题在许可设定中解决是适宜的，有权力体制方面的原因，具体设计倒司法审查范围和许可设定权限.也因为许可设定自身在解决许可自由裁量方面的优势，行政许可中自由裁量问题实际上是在许可设定中公正地分配利益的问题。事实上，通过考察美国行政法自由裁量问题嬗变的历程，我们可以确定，公正性是许可设定中自由裁量问题的主要部分.本文第一部分主要是表明许可设定中自由裁量的形式含义和实质含义。第二部分则是确定许可设定中自由裁量问题的实质是哪一个问题。第三部分是对美国行政法中解决公正性问题的理论——利益代表理论进行简单介绍。第四部分则是根据中国目前的立法体制作一些解决许可设定中自由裁量问题的方法的建议。本文的结构是为了体现许可设定中自由裁量的关注点是公正性问题,所以采用美国行政自由裁量问题的相关理论来印证这种判定是合理的,如果读者足够细心的话,在美国行政法中,行政许可中的行政自由裁量问题的发生过两次转变,与行政许可关系密切的是公正性问题.这样,对中国行政许可中自由问题的定位就避开了"有效限制行政权力 "之类的定位.认为行政自由裁量问题是有效限制权力的问题的判断,更加适用于于行政管制行为而非行政许可行为. 本文并不着意去介绍许可设定的立法属性或者行政立法属性。立法自由裁量并不是许可设定中自由裁量需要重点强调的一面.作者想做的是如何解决行政许可中自由裁量问题——公正性问题，以及为这些方法的有效性提供论证，这些就是本文第四部分内容。

dc.description.abstract
This article is the use of which represent the interests of the United States administrative law permit the theory to solve China discretion in setting the question of an attempt to solve the problem but before the permission settings to determine what is discretionary. Discretion on he issue of the positioning, different theories have different views, the paper examined the United States legal system of administrative law in the evolution of history, the Chinese administrative licensing discretion in question is a fair question, and found that administrative discretion in the issue of license only set the stage in the permit can be effectively resolved. So permit discretion in setting the issue of licensing and administrative discretion has become the focus of argument. After feasibility studies, to determine permit discretion in setting the issue of discretion is the issue of administrative licensing. Finally, with reference to represent the interests of the theoretical methods, combined with China's legislative system, the actual situation and the relevant provisions of the Licensing Act, permission settings on the discretion to issue its own recommendations. In this paper, in the discretion of the administrative licensing issues by reference to the U.S. to determine the need for discretion of the Chief Administrative Law Theory and Germany related to the administrative discretion theory. China's administrative discretion in the issue of permits in the permit when the appropriate setting to address the reasons of the power system, but also set their own license permits discretion in the settlement of advantages, so the discretion of the administrative licensing is in fact as a The concept of transitional exist. Administrative licensing in the field of distribution of benefits has a strong character, on the fairness of discretion a special request. In fact, the United States through the study of administrative law issues discretion of the course of evolution, we can confirm that the impartiality of discretion is almost synonymous with the problem. The first part of this paper is to indicate that the main permission settings in the form of discretionary meaning of meaning and substance. The second part is to determine the permission settings in the discretion of the substance of the issue is a question which. The third part is the U.S. administrative law to address the issue of impartiality of the theory - which represent the interests of a brief theory. Part IV is based on the legislative body in China is making some sort of permission settings in the discretion of the recommendations of the problem. In this paper, the structure is set up in order to reflect the discretionary licensing of concern is the issue of fairness, so the use of the United States the issue of administrative discretion of the relevant theory to prove that it is reasonable to determine if the reader carefully enough, then, in the United States administrative law , administrative licensing in the discretion of the Chief of the attention the issue has only one thing: that is the fairness of the administrative discretion issue. In this way, in the administrative license in China's position on the freedom to avoid the "effective in curbing the executive power" and the position of administrative licensing kind of positioning makes the interests of the most pressing demands and claims there is no response, and that the ultimate question of positioning technology developed by the administrative law in legal practice will ultimately led to the failure of the face, as the U.S. administrative law is strictly prohibited principle of delegated legislative power and other related administrative law, like the failure of technology. This article does not permit effort to introduce legislation setting attributes or properties of the executive and the legislature. Legislation does not permit discretion in setting the need to focus on the discretionary side, we need to do is discretionary in the legislature under the premise of how to solve the discretion of the administrative licensing issues - the question of impartiality, as well as the effectiveness of these methods provide argument, which is the fourth part of the contents of this article.

dc.date.issued
2025-11-21

西南政法大学机构知识库，欢迎您

行政许可设定中自由裁量问题研究