应收账款质押问题法律对策研究

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

作者:

余文焱

导师:

赵万一

导师单位:

民商法学院(知识产权学院)

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

应收账款;应收账款质押;法律对策

摘要:

《物权法》将应收账款纳入可以设质之财产权利范畴,首次确认了应 收账款质押的合法地位。允许应收账款质押,在开展应收账款转让融资的 基础上进一步挖掘了应收账款的财产价值、拓宽了企业的融资渠道,有利 于解决中小企业融资难、不动产担保过分集中等现实问题,对于我国金融 市场的发展具有深远意义。 本文从应收账款的法律内涵开始,概括了应收账款非证券化的金钱 合 同债权特性,按存在状态将应收账款分为现有应收账款和未来应收账款两 大类,并着重分析了实践中发生最为频繁、争议最大的收费权类应收账款 的内涵、外延、特征及其种类,将法律法规直接规定的收费权和合同约定 的收费权排除在属于应收账款范畴的收费权之外,明确提出只有政府行政 许可或特许经营的收费权适宜纳入可质押收费权类应收账款范畴。 在剖析应收账款的基础上,本文对应收账款质押的法律定义进行了界 定,阐述了应收账款质押的独特性及应收账款质权设立的要件,分析了应 收账款质押制度区别于其他权利质押的出质人与应收账款债务人之间和质 权人与 应收账款债务人之间两种特殊的法律关系。同时为更好地理解应收 账款质押制度,本文对应收账款转让和应收账款质押进行了比较,并从企 业融资需要、融资工具创新、金融机构风险缓释,以及应收账款的可质押 性和风险可控性等方面,指出单独构建应收账款质押制度的必要性和可行 性。 但应收账款质押作为一种新型担保方式,风险识别和控制难度较大, 《物权法》之规定过于宽泛和原则,缺乏可操作性。因此,本文从制度设 计和操作规范两方面对现有应收账款质押制度的风险进行了全面剖析,重 点分析了应收账款质押登记公示、实现模式、债务人通知等方面的制度设 计缺 陷,以及应收账款质权设立前选择、设立后管理和实现时所面临的恶 意欺诈、权利暇疵、价值评估、管理能力等操作风险。在充分揭示风险的 前提下,本文从法律内涵、质押登记、债务人通知、质权实现四个方面提 出了完善我国应收账款质押制度的构想;同时,从应收账款选择、质押合 同约定、设质后管理三个方面为现有法律制度框架下开展应收账款质押业 务提出了合理化建议。

学科:

法律*

提交日期

2025-11-18

引用参考

余文焱. 应收账款质押问题法律对策研究[D]. 西南政法大学,2008.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 应收账款质押问题法律对策研究
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 2025tj120
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 余文焱
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 民商法学院(知识产权学院)
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法律硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2008
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 赵万一
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 民商法学院(知识产权学院)
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 应收账款 ;应收账款质押;法律对策
  • dc.subject
  • Account Receivable;Account Receivable pledge;Legal Countermeasures
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 《物权法》将应收账款纳入可以设质之财产权利范畴,首次确认了应 收账款质押的合法地位。允许应收账款质押,在开展应收账款转让融资的 基础上进一步挖掘了应收账款的财产价值、拓宽了企业的融资渠道,有利 于解决中小企业融资难、不动产担保过分集中等现实问题,对于我国金融 市场的发展具有深远意义。 本文从应收账款的法律内涵开始,概括了应收账款非证券化的金钱 合 同债权特性,按存在状态将应收账款分为现有应收账款和未来应收账款两 大类,并着重分析了实践中发生最为频繁、争议最大的收费权类应收账款 的内涵、外延、特征及其种类,将法律法规直接规定的收费权和合同约定 的收费权排除在属于应收账款范畴的收费权之外,明确提出只有政府行政 许可或特许经营的收费权适宜纳入可质押收费权类应收账款范畴。 在剖析应收账款的基础上,本文对应收账款质押的法律定义进行了界 定,阐述了应收账款质押的独特性及应收账款质权设立的要件,分析了应 收账款质押制度区别于其他权利质押的出质人与应收账款债务人之间和质 权人与 应收账款债务人之间两种特殊的法律关系。同时为更好地理解应收 账款质押制度,本文对应收账款转让和应收账款质押进行了比较,并从企 业融资需要、融资工具创新、金融机构风险缓释,以及应收账款的可质押 性和风险可控性等方面,指出单独构建应收账款质押制度的必要性和可行 性。 但应收账款质押作为一种新型担保方式,风险识别和控制难度较大, 《物权法》之规定过于宽泛和原则,缺乏可操作性。因此,本文从制度设 计和操作规范两方面对现有应收账款质押制度的风险进行了全面剖析,重 点分析了应收账款质押登记公示、实现模式、债务人通知等方面的制度设 计缺 陷,以及应收账款质权设立前选择、设立后管理和实现时所面临的恶 意欺诈、权利暇疵、价值评估、管理能力等操作风险。在充分揭示风险的 前提下,本文从法律内涵、质押登记、债务人通知、质权实现四个方面提 出了完善我国应收账款质押制度的构想;同时,从应收账款选择、质押合 同约定、设质后管理三个方面为现有法律制度框架下开展应收账款质押业 务提出了合理化建议。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Accounts receivable was included in property rights wh ich can be pledged by Real Right Law, and the legal status of Accounts receivable pledge was confirmed for the first time. Allowance of Accounts receivable pledge further excavate the property value of accounts receivable and broaden the financing channels for enterprises on the basis of carrying out the transfer of Accounts receivable financing, and help to solve difficulties in small and medium enterprises financing, over-concentration of real estate secured, and other practical problems. Allowance of Accounts receivable pledge has Far-reaching significance for the development of China's financial markets. From the beginning of the legal connotation of Accounts receivable, the author Summarized the characteristics of Accounts receivable with non-securitization and money type of contract claims, classificated Accounts receivables into current and future categories according to the state of existence, analysed connotation and extension and features and types of the Right-to-charges with the most frequent occurrence and the most controversial, excluded the Right-to-charge which provided directly by Laws and regulations and Contract from the Right-to-charges which belong to Accounts Receivables, and pointed out clearly that only the Right-to-Charges which administrative licensed or franchised by Government may be appropriated into the scope of the Right-to-Charge of Accounts receivable can be pledged. On the basis of the analysis about Accounts receivable, the arthor defined the legal definition of Acounts receivable pledge in this paper,e expounded the unique quality of Accounts receivable pledge and the elements on the establishment of right to Acounts receivable pledge,analyzed the special legal relationship between pledger and debtor and the special legal relati onship between pledgee and debtor in Acounts receivable pledge system different from other right pledge system. For a better understanding of Accounts receivable pledge system, the author 2 compared the transfer of Accounts receivable and Accounts receivable pledge,and pointed out the necessity and feasibility of the establishment of a separate accounts receivable pledge system from the needs of corporate finance,innovation of financing tools, risk sustained-release of financial institutions, pledge possibility and risk control of accounts receivable, and so on. However, as a new security model, accounts receivable pledge is difficult to identify and control risks.The provisions in Real Right Lawin Real Right Law are too general and principle to lack operability.So the author analysed comprehensively the risk of Accounts receivable pledge system from both system design and operating rules, particularly analysed the defects of system design from registration publicity and achieve model and inform debtor and so on,as well as operational risk including malicious fraud and rights defects and valuation and management capacity and so on. Under the premise of the full disclosure about risks,the author put forward the idea to improve Accounts receivable pledge system from the legal connotation and pledge registration and notification for debtor and the realization,whilehile put forward the rationalized proposals from the choice of Accounts receivable adn pledge contract and management after pledged in three areas,for carrying out Accounts receivable pledge under the existing legal framework.
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2025-11-18
回到顶部