合同诈骗罪若干问题辨析

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属院系:

法学院

作者:

杨鹏

导师:

陈忠林

导师单位:

法学院

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

合同诈骗;诈骗;民事欺诈

摘要:

随着我国对外开放步伐的不断加快和社会主义市场经济的日益活跃, 国内和国际贸易的渐趋频繁,社会中利用合同进行诈骗犯罪的比例越来越 高。此类犯罪极大地侵害了被害人的合法权益,扰乱了正常的市场经济秩 序,危害比较严重,且具有不同于 普通诈骗犯罪的特点。为了更加准确地 打击犯罪, 1997 年刑法修订后,新增了合同诈骗罪的罪名,而且被立法 者归入破坏社会主义市场经济秩序罪,是扰乱市场秩序类罪中极为重要的 一个罪名。对合同诈骗罪进行研讨, 有利于在理论上加深认识,在实践中 准确认定罪与非罪、分清此罪与彼罪。本文在研读有关论文、专著的基础 上, 通过刑法理论解释了合同诈骗罪的犯罪构成和法律意义;根据合同诈 骗罪的危害本质及立法目的,分析了合同诈骗罪中 合同 的本质和形式; 并对如何认定合同诈骗犯罪中行为人具有 非法占有 目的进行了详细地 阐述,指出客观行为是主观目 的的外在表现,对于合同诈骗中行为人的非 法占有的目的,应该通过合同行为中各个环节的客观事实来加以考虑,全 面、辩证、客观地进行分析,切不可片面地以行为人某一个孤立的客观因 素为依据,来轻率地认定行为人具有非法占有的目的。本文还结合 合同法 理论与刑法理论,详细分析了合同诈骗犯罪中单位犯罪与个人犯罪如何认 定及合同诈骗犯罪中涉及的其他一些争议问题。 最后,文章用 比较的方法, 对合同诈骗罪与民事欺诈行为的界限从主客观差异、数额影响及行为后果 等多个方面进行了论述,并在结合实例的基础上,对合同诈骗罪与诈骗罪、 票据诈骗罪、贷款诈骗罪 等相关罪名的区别进行了评析, 并提出自己的观 点 由此希望通过本文能够有利于在司法实践中正确认定和惩处此类犯 罪。

学科:

法律*

提交日期

2025-11-17

引用参考

杨鹏. 合同诈骗罪若干问题辨析[D]. 西南政法大学,2008.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 合同诈骗罪若干问题辨析
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 05444110402004
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 杨鹏
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 法学院
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法律硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2008
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 陈忠林
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 法学院
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 合同诈骗;诈骗;民事欺诈
  • dc.subject
  • Contract crime of fraud;Crime of fraud;The civil fraud
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 随着我国对外开放步伐的不断加快和社会主义市场经济的日益活跃, 国内和国际贸易的渐趋频繁,社会中利用合同进行诈骗犯罪的比例越来越 高。此类犯罪极大地侵害了被害人的合法权益,扰乱了正常的市场经济秩 序,危害比较严重,且具有不同于 普通诈骗犯罪的特点。为了更加准确地 打击犯罪, 1997 年刑法修订后,新增了合同诈骗罪的罪名,而且被立法 者归入破坏社会主义市场经济秩序罪,是扰乱市场秩序类罪中极为重要的 一个罪名。对合同诈骗罪进行研讨, 有利于在理论上加深认识,在实践中 准确认定罪与非罪、分清此罪与彼罪。本文在研读有关论文、专著的基础 上, 通过刑法理论解释了合同诈骗罪的犯罪构成和法律意义;根据合同诈 骗罪的危害本质及立法目的,分析了合同诈骗罪中 合同 的本质和形式; 并对如何认定合同诈骗犯罪中行为人具有 非法占有 目的进行了详细地 阐述,指出客观行为是主观目 的的外在表现,对于合同诈骗中行为人的非 法占有的目的,应该通过合同行为中各个环节的客观事实来加以考虑,全 面、辩证、客观地进行分析,切不可片面地以行为人某一个孤立的客观因 素为依据,来轻率地认定行为人具有非法占有的目的。本文还结合 合同法 理论与刑法理论,详细分析了合同诈骗犯罪中单位犯罪与个人犯罪如何认 定及合同诈骗犯罪中涉及的其他一些争议问题。 最后,文章用 比较的方法, 对合同诈骗罪与民事欺诈行为的界限从主客观差异、数额影响及行为后果 等多个方面进行了论述,并在结合实例的基础上,对合同诈骗罪与诈骗罪、 票据诈骗罪、贷款诈骗罪 等相关罪名的区别进行了评析, 并提出自己的观 点 由此希望通过本文能够有利于在司法实践中正确认定和惩处此类犯 罪。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Content abstract: Speeds up unceasingly along with our country opening to the outside world step with the socialist market economy day by day , domestic and the inte rnational trade gradually hastens frequently, in the society carries on the crime of fraud using the contract the proportion to be more and more high .This kind of crime has violated victim's legitimate rights and interests enormously, harassed the normal market economy order, the harm quite has been serious, also had is different with the ordinary crime of fraud characteristic. In order to attack the crime accurately, after in 1997 the criminal law revision, increased the contract cheating crime charge, mo reover belongs to by the legislator the destruction socialist market economy order crime, is harasses in the market order class crime an extremely important charge. Carries on the deliberation to the contract crime of fraud , is advantageous in theoreticall y deepens the understanding, in reality recognized accurately the crime with the non crime, distinguishes clearly this crime and other crime. This article in the related paper, in the monograph foundation, explained the contract crime of fraud constitution and the legal significance through the criminal law theory; According to the contract crime of fraud , harm essence and the legislation goal, has analyzed the contract crime of fraud “the contract” in the essence and the form. And how to recognize in the contract crime of fraud the author had “illegally holds” the goal to carry on elaborated in detail, pointed out the objective behavior was the subjective goal external performance, the author illegal held the goal regarding the contract crime of fraud in, should each link fact come through the contract behavior in to consider, comprehensive, dialectical, carried on the analysis objectively, cut may not one sidedly take author some isolated objective factor as the basis, came to recognize rashly the author h ad the goal which illegal held. This article also unifies the law of contract theory and the criminal law theory, how in the multianalysis contract crime of fraud had the unit crime with individual crime recognized and in the 2 contract cheating crime involv contract cheating crime involves other some dispute question. Finally, the es other some dispute question. Finally, the article with the comparison method, to the contract article with the comparison method, to the contract crime of fraud crime of fraud and the civil and the civil fraudulent practice boundary from the subjective and objective difference, the fraudulent practice boundary from the subjective and objective difference, the amount influence and the behavior consequence and samount influence and the behavior consequence and so on many aspects has o on many aspects has carried on the elaboration, and in the union example foundation, to contract carried on the elaboration, and in the union example foundation, to contract correlation charge and so on correlation charge and so on crime of fraud ,crime of fraud , bill bill crime of fraud,crime of fraud, loan loan crime of crime of fraud fraud differences, has carried on the evaluation, and proposed own viewpointdifferences, has carried on the evaluation, and proposed own viewpoint, , hoped from this can be advantageous through this article to in the judicial hoped from this can be advantageous through this article to in the judicial practice recognized and punishes this kind of crime correctly.practice recognized and punishes this kind of crime correctly.
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2025-11-17
回到顶部