“三公经费”审计推进国有企业腐败治理的机制与路径研究——以G公司为例

Research on the Mechanism and Path of "Three Public Funds" Audit to Promote Corruption Governance in State-owned Enterprises: A Case Study of Company G.

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

作者:

张媛

导师:

田娇

导师单位:

商学院(监察审计学院)

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

国家审计;三公经费;国有企业;腐败治理

摘要:

国有企业是国民经济的重要组成部分,2014年以来国有企业改革进入全面深化新时期。改革虽赋予国有企业更多自主决策空间,但也增加了腐败的可能性及廉政风险。“三公经费”滥用问题突出,由其产生的腐败兼具复杂性和隐蔽性,难以被发现。党的十八大以来,党中央高度重视国企反腐倡廉,二十届中央纪委三次全会强调要遏制享乐主义,以确保国企在正确的轨道上健康发展,为国家经济建设贡献更大力量。国家审计作为国家治理架构中的中流砥柱,应该肩负起治理国有企业腐败的重要职责。本论文在现有研究基础上,首先明确了国有企业“三公经费”审计与企业腐败的内涵与特点;然后以寻租理论、国家治理理论、受托经济责任理论为支持,对“三公经费”审计治理国企腐败的现状、作用机制以及实现路径进行分析。通过对审计概况分析发现我国国有企业“三公经费”存在超标准支出重大、内控与整改薄弱、外部监管缺位的问题;认为“三公经费”审计治理国有企业腐败作用机制为:识别公款异常支出行为、纠查典型违规违法行为、揭示财务制度设计漏洞、回应社会公众监督诉求;认为“三公经费”审计推进国有企业腐败治理主要通过实施审查原始凭证、询问调查相关人员、分析费用和重新执行报销流程等审计程序,以及与公众和监管机构协同治理实现。在此基础上,选择了G公司的审计项目作为研究案例,深入剖析“三公经费”审计结果,结果表明G公司存在油费支出异常、报销不合规、内控设计不合理和执行不到位等问题;通过审计结果得出G公司“三公经费”审计推进腐败治理存在缺少审计参照标准、延伸调查不足、问责机制不全、审计人员配置不当等不足;最后,结合实际情况,提出应当统一审计标准、构建信息平台、开展常态化审计、强化人力资源与问责机制的对策建议。本文从腐败治理的角度拓展了“三公经费”审计的研究范畴,为国有企业腐败治理理论框架提供了更多可能的路径;同时,基于实务案例,对审计机关改进审计工作提供了具体建议,使国家审计更好地服务于国有企业腐败治理,以期对“三公经费”审计有效治理国有企业腐败赋予一定的借鉴意义。

提交日期

2025-07-02

引用参考

张媛. “三公经费”审计推进国有企业腐败治理的机制与路径研究——以G公司为例[D]. 西南政法大学,2025.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • “三公经费”审计推进国有企业腐败治理的机制与路径研究——以G公司为例
  • dc.title
  • Research on the Mechanism and Path of "Three Public Funds" Audit to Promote Corruption Governance in State-owned Enterprises: A Case Study of Company G.
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20220257000183
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 张媛
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 商学院(监察审计学院)
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 审计硕士专业学位
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2025
  • dc.contributor.direction
  • 国家审计
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 田娇
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 商学院(监察审计学院)
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 国家审计,三公经费,国有企业,腐败治理
  • dc.subject
  • State Audit; Public Expenditure; State-owned Enterprises; Corruption Governance
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 国有企业是国民经济的重要组成部分,2014年以来国有企业改革进入全面深化新时期。改革虽赋予国有企业更多自主决策空间,但也增加了腐败的可能性及廉政风险。“三公经费”滥用问题突出,由其产生的腐败兼具复杂性和隐蔽性,难以被发现。党的十八大以来,党中央高度重视国企反腐倡廉,二十届中央纪委三次全会强调要遏制享乐主义,以确保国企在正确的轨道上健康发展,为国家经济建设贡献更大力量。国家审计作为国家治理架构中的中流砥柱,应该肩负起治理国有企业腐败的重要职责。本论文在现有研究基础上,首先明确了国有企业“三公经费”审计与企业腐败的内涵与特点;然后以寻租理论、国家治理理论、受托经济责任理论为支持,对“三公经费”审计治理国企腐败的现状、作用机制以及实现路径进行分析。通过对审计概况分析发现我国国有企业“三公经费”存在超标准支出重大、内控与整改薄弱、外部监管缺位的问题;认为“三公经费”审计治理国有企业腐败作用机制为:识别公款异常支出行为、纠查典型违规违法行为、揭示财务制度设计漏洞、回应社会公众监督诉求;认为“三公经费”审计推进国有企业腐败治理主要通过实施审查原始凭证、询问调查相关人员、分析费用和重新执行报销流程等审计程序,以及与公众和监管机构协同治理实现。在此基础上,选择了G公司的审计项目作为研究案例,深入剖析“三公经费”审计结果,结果表明G公司存在油费支出异常、报销不合规、内控设计不合理和执行不到位等问题;通过审计结果得出G公司“三公经费”审计推进腐败治理存在缺少审计参照标准、延伸调查不足、问责机制不全、审计人员配置不当等不足;最后,结合实际情况,提出应当统一审计标准、构建信息平台、开展常态化审计、强化人力资源与问责机制的对策建议。本文从腐败治理的角度拓展了“三公经费”审计的研究范畴,为国有企业腐败治理理论框架提供了更多可能的路径;同时,基于实务案例,对审计机关改进审计工作提供了具体建议,使国家审计更好地服务于国有企业腐败治理,以期对“三公经费”审计有效治理国有企业腐败赋予一定的借鉴意义。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • State-owned enterprises are an important part of the national economy, and since 2014, the reform of state-owned enterprises has entered a new era of comprehensive deepening. Although the reform has given state-owned enterprises more room for independent decision-making, it has also increased the possibility of corruption and the risk of corruption. The problem of abuse of the "three public funds" is prominent, and the corruption caused by it is both complex and hidden, and it is difficult to detect. Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the CPC Central Committee has attached great importance to the fight against corruption and clean government in state-owned enterprises, and the Third Plenary Session of the 20th Central Commission for Discipline Inspection emphasized the need to curb hedonism in order to ensure the healthy development of state-owned enterprises on the right track and make greater contributions to the country's economic construction. As the mainstay of the national governance structure, the state audit should shoulder the important responsibility of controlling corruption in state-owned enterprises and ensure its own standardized operation.On the basis of the existing research, this paper firstly clarifies the connotation and characteristics of the audit of the "three public funds" of state-owned enterprises and corporate corruption. Then, with the support of rent-seeking theory, national governance theory and fiduciary economic responsibility theory, this paper analyzes the current situation, mechanism and realization path of the "three public funds" audit governance of state-owned enterprise corruption, and finds that the "three public funds" of state-owned enterprises in China have problems such as major over-standard expenditure, weak internal control and rectification, and lack of external supervision. It is believed that the mechanism of the "three public funds" audit and governance of corruption in state-owned enterprises is as follows: identifying abnormal expenditure behaviors of public funds, correcting typical violations of laws and regulations, revealing loopholes in the design of financial systems, and responding to public supervision and requests. It is believed that the "three public funds" audit to promote the corruption governance of state-owned enterprises is mainly achieved through the implementation of audit procedures such as reviewing original vouchers, questioning relevant personnel, analyzing expenses and re-implementing the reimbursement process, as well as coordinating governance with the public and regulators. On this basis, the audit project of Company G was selected as a case study to analyze the audit results of the "three public funds", and the results showed that Company G had problems such as abnormal fuel expenses, non-compliant reimbursement, unreasonable internal control design and inadequate implementation. Through the audit results, it is concluded that there are deficiencies in the audit of "three public funds" of Company G to promote corruption governance, such as lack of audit reference standards, insufficient extended investigation, incomplete accountability mechanism, and improper allocation of audit personnel. Finally, combined with the actual situation, this paper puts forward countermeasures and suggestions that should unify audit standards, build an information platform, carry out regular audits, and strengthen human resources and accountability mechanisms.From the perspective of corruption governance, this paper expands the research scope of the audit of "three public funds", and provides more possible paths for the theoretical framework of corruption governance in state-owned enterprises. At the same time, based on practical cases, this paper provides specific suggestions for audit institutions to improve their audit work, so that the state audit can better serve the corruption governance of state-owned enterprises, in order to give a certain reference significance to the effective governance of corruption in state-owned enterprises by the audit of the "three public funds".
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2025-05-28
  • dc.date.oralDefense
  • 2025-05-18
回到顶部