中国对RCEP伙伴国绿色投资效率测度及影响因素研究

Research on the Assessment of Green Investment Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors in RCEP Partner Countries by China

本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

作者:

谭澜

导师:

汪毅霖

导师单位:

经济学院(数字经济学院)

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

综合技术效率

摘要:

党的二十大报告指出,要加强生态环境保护,坚持“绿色、循环、低碳发展”。绿色投资既是解决环境问题,降低碳排放的重要手段,也是绿色发展的主要动力。我们要进一步深化认识绿色投资的内涵与外延。推进我国绿色投资效率评估及影响因素分析的研究,有助于帮助我国了解自身绿色投资的具体劣势点,更好地践行习近平总书记提出的“两山”理论。RCEP协定提出的目的之一是为了促进各国要素资源流通、实现各国互联互通。RCEP伙伴国与我国在绿色经济发展领域有着密切的双边贸易往来,在繁忙双边贸易的同时,沿线的发展中国家受限于资金、技术、制度等多方面因素制约,导致绿色投资效率普遍低下,这极大地影响了我国与RCEP伙伴国间绿色发展的要素流通以及技术转移,这与RCEP协定的战略宗旨是相悖的。我国需要增加对伙伴国的绿色投资效率的了解,以帮助我国针对不同国家绿色投资效率水平,制定对相应国家的投资政策。因此,科学测算绿色投资效率,分析其影响因素和内在机制,对于促进我国经济社会可持续发展、实现美丽中国伟大愿景具有重要的理论和现实意义。本文首先对绿色投资进行了系统概述,接着从绿色投资环境和规模两大方面分析了绿色投资现状。在此基础上,进一步综合评价中国在RCEP伙伴国的绿色投资效率。本文选取RCEP的10个成员国2009年至2021年的面板数据,采用SBM-DEA模型测度绿色投资效率并揭示其区域差异特征;采用GML指数法分析这一时期绿色投资效率的时空演化特征。然后,本文进一步采用Tobit模型开展实证研究。本文选取经济发展水平和进出口总额作为经济指标,产业结构和科技水平为技术指标,城镇化程度、对外开放程度和制度质量为社会指标,拟从经济、技术和社会三个层面考察了绿色投资效率的影响因素。SBM模型和GML指数效率测算表明:从静态时间角度考虑,我国对RCEP伙伴国的绿色投资效率的地区差异明显;从动态时间角度考虑,2003年至2021年我国绿色投资效率总体呈现上升趋势,但仍未达到最优状态,这主要是由于规模效率低造成的。Tobit模型回归结果表明:在国家层面上,绿色投资效率受经济发展水平和政府监管水平的正向影响,而受产业结构、开放程度和城镇化水平的负向影响;在区域层面上,绿色投资效率的影响因素呈现出异质性,不同区域的效率影响因素存在差异。最后,本文基于理论分析和实证结果,从经济层面、制度层面和区域层面提出了一系列提高绿色投资效率的对策和建议。

参考文献:

1.田江海.绿色经济与绿色投资[M].中国市场出版社,2010版。 2.马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译.人民出版社,2000版。 3.马克思恩格斯全集(第42卷)[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译.人民出版社,1979版。 4.怀特海:《过程与实在》[M],周邦宪译,贵阳:贵州人民出版社,2006年科学版),2016,15(04):1-8。 5.郝亮,汪明月,贾蕾等.弥补外部性:从环境经济政策到绿色创新体系——兼论应对中国环境领域主要矛盾的转换[J].环境与可持续发展,2019,44(03):50-55。 6.陈玉玲.生态环境的外部性与环境经济政策[J].经济研究导刊,2014,(16):291-292+300。 7.牛文元.可持续发展理论的内涵认知——纪念联合国里约环发大会20周年[J].中国人口资源与环境,2012,22(05):9-14。 8.杨超,覃娟.RCEP背景下中国与东盟绿色发展合作研究[J].广西社会科学,2022,(09):80-86。 9.中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室.新时代的中国绿色发展[N].人民日报,2023-01-20(007)。 10.夏勇.当代投资新走向──绿色投资[J].鄂州大学学报,1999,(02):33-35。 11.王天山.试析美国《1930年关税法》修正案——反补贴法律的溯及性以及双重救济问题的发展[J].公民与法(法学版),2012,(08):56-58。 12.郭捷,刘相汝,朱璧和.“双碳”目标下的绿色投资:文献述评与研究展望[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2024,23(01):105-113。 13.李剑玲,黄海峰.论中国绿色投资管理[J].再生资源与循环经济,2012,5(04):15-19。 14.任相伟,孙丽文.绿色经济的内涵、演化逻辑及推进路径——基于经济——生态——社会复杂系统视角[J].技术经济与管理研究,2020,(02):88-93。 15.黄森,呙小明.我国对“中欧班列”沿线国家绿色投资效率评价及影响因素研究——基于SBM- undesirable模型与空间计量模型的结合[J].国际商务研究,2018,39(06):5-16。 16.张大为,黄秀丽.产业政策、内外部治理与企业绿色投资[J].财会通讯,2023,(24):53-56+82。 17.莫凌水,翟永平,张俊杰.“一带一路”绿色投资标尺和绿色成本效益核算[J].中国人民大学学报,2019,33(04):23-35。 18.赵领娣,王小飞.企业绿色投资及绿色费用能否提升经营绩效?——基于EBM和面板Tobit模型的经验分析[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2022,24(03):28-42。 19.李根忠,朱洪亮.基于三阶段SBM-DEA-Malmquist指数的长江经济带碳排放效率研究[J].运筹与管理,2022,31(06):161-167。 20.贾铠箫.要素市场价格扭曲对绿色全要素生产率的影响研究[D].新疆财经大学,2022。 21.任保全.技术创新、市场需求与石油石化产业生产率动态演变——基于江苏上市公司的Malmquist指数法[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(06):89-99。 22.田玉敏.径向集中式DEA模型的效率研究[J].佳木斯大学学报(自然科学版),2010,28(04): 593-594+597。 23.王文,杨凡欣.“一带一路”与中国对外投资的绿色化进程[J].中国人民大学学报,2019,33(04):10-22。 24.王学敏,杨磊.基于SBM模型的新疆农业绿色全要素生产率评价研究[J].现代农业科技,2023, (22):171-175。 25.方杏村,陈浩.经济增长和环境污染的动态关系及其区域差异——基于资源枯竭型城市面板数据的实证分析[J].生态经济,2015,31(06):49-52。 26.杜雯翠,张平淡.新常态下的经济增长与环境污染——来自新兴经济体国家的经验证据[J].软科学,2015,29(10):20-23+38。 27.朱静.“一带一路”战略下中国对中亚五国绿色投资的影响测度分析[J].经济研究导刊,2018, (02):123-126。 28.崔秀梅.企业绿色投资的驱动机制及其实现路径——基于价值创造的分析[J].江海学刊,2013, (3):85-91。 29.中国人民银行济南分行课题组,张立光.山东参与“一带一路”经贸合作的绿色投资风险及政策建议[J].金融发展研究,2019,(12):63-68。 30.刘霞.中国引领全球可再生能源投资,能源目标加速实现[J].新能源科技,2022,(10):1-2。 31.夏启繁.中国对RCEP国家能源投资布局与风险的时空特征[J]. 世界地理研究,2022,31(4): 814-826。 32.曾文革,王怡. 中国——东盟《投资协议》实施探究.经济问题探索,2010(4):147-151。 33.张国旺. 中国——东盟自由贸易区:进程与动因. 经济研究导刊,2013(22):265-267。 34.王杨堃.设施联通提升RCEP经济价值[J].中国投资(中英文),2020(Z5):53-54。 35.文春晖,马凯玲.RCEP成员国农业投资环境评价及投资对策研究[J].对外经贸实务,2023, (05):64-76。 36.Inderst, G., Kaminker, Ch. & Stewart, F., 2012, Defining and Measuring Green Investments: Implications for Institutional Investors‟ Asset Allocations”, OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions, No.24, OECD Publishing. 37.IRENA, 2023, Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2022, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. 38.Acemoglu, D., & Guerrieri, V., 2008, Capital Deepening and Nonbalanced Economic Growth. Journal of political Economy, 116(3), pp.467-498. 39.Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E.,1978, Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), pp.429-444. 40.Cropper, M. & Griffiths, C., 1994, The Interaction of Population Growth and Environmental Quality. The American Economic Review, 84(2), pp.250-254. 41.Czakó, V., 2012, Evolution of Hungarian Residential Energy Efficiency Support Programmes: Road to and Operation Under the Green Investment Scheme. Energy efficiency, 5(2), pp.163-178. 42.Du, K., Li, P., & Yan, Z., 2019, Do Green Technology Innovations Contribute to Carbon Dioxide Emission Reduction? Empirical Evidence From Patent Data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, pp.146, 297-303. 43.Elkington, J., 1998, Partnerships from Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st‐Century Business. Environmental quality management, 8(1), pp.37-51. 44.Eyraud, L., Wane, M. A., Zhang, M. C., & Clements, M. B. J., 2011, Who's Going Green and Why? Trends and Determinants of Green Investment. IMF working papers, 11. 45.Farrell, M. J., 1957, The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 120(3), pp.253-281. 46.Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. K., Schmidt, S. S., & Yaisawarng, S., 2002, Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of productivity Analysis, 17, pp.157-174. 47.Guerrieri, P., Luciani, M., & Meliciani, V., 2011, The Determinants of Investment in Information and Communication Technologies. Economics of Innovation and new Technology, 20(4), pp.387-403. 48.Hite, D., Hudson, D., & Intarapapong, W., 2002,. Willingness to Pay For Water Quality Improvements: The Case of Precision Application Technology. Journal of Agricultural and resource Economics, pp.433-449. 49.Karásek, J., & Pavlica, J., 2016, Green Investment Scheme: Experience and Results in The Czech Republic. Energy Policy, 90, pp.121-130. 50.Kusumastuti RD, Van Donk DP, Teunter R., 2016, Crop-Related Harvesting and Processing Planning: a Review. International Journal of Production Economics, 174, pp.76-92. 51.Kalirajan K, Liu Y., 2016, Renewable Energy Trade within Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Countries: An Exploratory Analysis. Aust. S. Asia Res. Cent, 5, pp. 2016-09. 52.Bashir M F, Benjiang M A, Hussain H I, et al.,2022, Evaluating Environmental Commitments to COP21 and The Role of Economic Complexity, Renewable Energy, Financial Development, Urbanization, and Energy Innovation: Empirical Evidence from the RCEP Countries[J]. Renewable Energy, 184: 541-550. 53.Latif, Y., Shunqi, G., Fareed, Z., Ali, S., & Bashir, M. A., 2023, Do Financial Development and Energy Efficiency Ensure Green Environment? Evidence From RCEP Economies. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 36(1), 51-72. 54.Liyun Liu, Zhenzhi Zhao, Mingming Zhang, Dequn Zhou, 2022, Green Investment Efficiency in The Chinese Energy Sector: Overinvestment or Underinvestment?,Energy Policy,Volume 160,112694,ISSN 0301-4215. 55.Lee, K.-H., & Min, B., 2015, Green R&D For Eco-Innovation and Its Impact on Carbon Emissions and Firm Performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 534-542. 56.Magalhães, N., 2021, The Green Investment Paradigm: Another Headlong Rush. Ecological Economics, 190, 107209. 57.Martin, P. R., & Moser, D. V., 2016, Managers’ Green Investment Disclosures and Investors’ Reaction. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 239-254. 58.Mengistu, A. A., & Adhikary, B. K., 2011, Does Good Governance Matter for FDI Inflows? Evidence from Asian Economies. Asia Pacific business review, 17(3), 281-299. 59.Newell, R. G., Jaffe, A. B., & Stavins, R. N., 2010, The Induced Innovation Hypothesis and Energy-Saving Technological Change. In Technological change and the environment (pp. 97-126). Routledge. 60.Drysdale P, Armstrong S, 2021, RCEP: a Strategic Opportunity For Multilateralism[J]. China Economic Journal, 14(2): 128-143. 61.North, D. C., & Thomas, R. P., 1973, The Rise of The Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge university press. 62.Popp, D., 2002, Induced Innovation and Energy Prices. American economic review, 92(1), 160-180. 63.Sabir, S., & Zahid, K., 2012, Macroeconomic Policies and Business Cycle: The Role of Institutions in Selected Saarc Countries. The Pakistan Development Review, 147-158. 64.Selden, T. M., & Song, D., 1994, Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and management, 27(2), 147-162. 65.Stiglitz, J. E., 1998, Knowledge for Development: Economic Science, Economic Policy and Economic Advice. Annual World Bank conference on development economics, 9-58. 66.Stokey, N. L., 1998, Are There Limits to Growth? International economic review, 1-31. 67.Tone K., 2001, A Slacks-Based Measure of Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. European journal of operational research.130(3): 498-509. 68.Wang Y, Xu A, 2023, Green Investments and Development of Renewable Energy Projects: Evidence From 15 RCEP Member Countries. Renewable Energy.211: 1045-1050. 69.Zhang, C., Wang, Z., 2023, Analysis of Spatiotemporal Difference and Driving Factors of Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency in RCEP Members: Insights from SBM-GML and Tobit Models. Environ Sci- Pollut Res 30, 15623–15640.  70.Zhang C, Chen P., 2022, Applying The Three-Stage SBM-DEA Model to Evaluate Energy Efficiency and Impact Factors In RCEP Countries. Energy,241: 122917. 71.Zeng Y, Guo W, Wang H, et al., 2020, A Two-Stage Evaluation and Optimization Method for Renewable Energy Development Based on Data Envelopment Analysis. Applied Energy, 262: 114363.

提交日期

2024-06-20

引用参考

谭澜. 中国对RCEP伙伴国绿色投资效率测度及影响因素研究[D]. 西南政法大学,2024.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 中国对RCEP伙伴国绿色投资效率测度及影响因素研究
  • dc.title
  • Research on the Assessment of Green Investment Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors in RCEP Partner Countries by China
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20220254000174
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 谭澜
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 经济学院(数字经济学院)
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 国际商务硕士专业学位
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2024
  • dc.contributor.direction
  • 国际商务
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 汪毅霖
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 经济学院(数字经济学院)
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 综合技术效率
  • dc.subject
  • Comprehensive Investment Efficiency;Green Economy;Sustainable Develop- ment; SBM-DEA Model
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 党的二十大报告指出,要加强生态环境保护,坚持“绿色、循环、低碳发展”。绿色投资既是解决环境问题,降低碳排放的重要手段,也是绿色发展的主要动力。我们要进一步深化认识绿色投资的内涵与外延。推进我国绿色投资效率评估及影响因素分析的研究,有助于帮助我国了解自身绿色投资的具体劣势点,更好地践行习近平总书记提出的“两山”理论。RCEP协定提出的目的之一是为了促进各国要素资源流通、实现各国互联互通。RCEP伙伴国与我国在绿色经济发展领域有着密切的双边贸易往来,在繁忙双边贸易的同时,沿线的发展中国家受限于资金、技术、制度等多方面因素制约,导致绿色投资效率普遍低下,这极大地影响了我国与RCEP伙伴国间绿色发展的要素流通以及技术转移,这与RCEP协定的战略宗旨是相悖的。我国需要增加对伙伴国的绿色投资效率的了解,以帮助我国针对不同国家绿色投资效率水平,制定对相应国家的投资政策。因此,科学测算绿色投资效率,分析其影响因素和内在机制,对于促进我国经济社会可持续发展、实现美丽中国伟大愿景具有重要的理论和现实意义。本文首先对绿色投资进行了系统概述,接着从绿色投资环境和规模两大方面分析了绿色投资现状。在此基础上,进一步综合评价中国在RCEP伙伴国的绿色投资效率。本文选取RCEP的10个成员国2009年至2021年的面板数据,采用SBM-DEA模型测度绿色投资效率并揭示其区域差异特征;采用GML指数法分析这一时期绿色投资效率的时空演化特征。然后,本文进一步采用Tobit模型开展实证研究。本文选取经济发展水平和进出口总额作为经济指标,产业结构和科技水平为技术指标,城镇化程度、对外开放程度和制度质量为社会指标,拟从经济、技术和社会三个层面考察了绿色投资效率的影响因素。SBM模型和GML指数效率测算表明:从静态时间角度考虑,我国对RCEP伙伴国的绿色投资效率的地区差异明显;从动态时间角度考虑,2003年至2021年我国绿色投资效率总体呈现上升趋势,但仍未达到最优状态,这主要是由于规模效率低造成的。Tobit模型回归结果表明:在国家层面上,绿色投资效率受经济发展水平和政府监管水平的正向影响,而受产业结构、开放程度和城镇化水平的负向影响;在区域层面上,绿色投资效率的影响因素呈现出异质性,不同区域的效率影响因素存在差异。最后,本文基于理论分析和实证结果,从经济层面、制度层面和区域层面提出了一系列提高绿色投资效率的对策和建议。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The report of the 20th CPC National Congress points out that it is necessary to strengthen ecological environmental protection and adhere to "green, circular and low-carbon development". Green investment is not only an important means to solve environmental problems and reduce carbon emissions, but also the main driving force for green development. We should further deepen our understanding of the connotation and extension of green investment. Promoting research on the assessment of the efficiency of green investment in China and the analysis of its influencing factors will help China understand the specific disadvantages of its own green investment and better practice the "two mountains" theory proposed by General Secretary Xi Jinping.One of the purposes of the RCEP agreement is to promote the circulation of factor resources and realize the connectivity of countries.Nowadays,RCEP partner countries have close bilateral trade exchanges with our country in the field of green economic development.Although the bilateral trade is busy, the developing countries within RCEP are limited by many factors such as capital, technology, and system, which leads to the general inefficiency of the green investment. It greatly influences the green development between our country and the RCEP partner countries. This greatly affects the flow of green development factors and technology transfer between China and RCEP partner countries, which is contrary to the strategic purpose of the RCEP agreement. China needs to increase its understanding of the green investment efficiency of partner countries to help it formulate investment policies for different countries according to their green investment efficiency levels. Therefore, scientific measurement of green investment efficiency and analysis of its influencing factors are of great significance for promoting China's sustainable development and realizing the great vision of a beautiful China.This paper first provides a systematic overview of green investment. Then it analyzes the current situation of green investment from two aspects: green investment environment and green investment scale. On this basis, this paper further comprehensively evaluates the efficiency of China's green investment in RCEP partner countries. This paper selects the panel data of 10 RCEP member countries from 2009 to 2021, and adopts the SBM-DEA model to measure the green investment efficiency and reveal its spatial difference characteristics; it also adopts the GML index method to analyze the spatial and temporal evolution characteristics of green investment efficiency in this period. Then, this paper further adopts Tobit model to carry out empirical research. In the regression analysis, this paper selects the level of economic development and the total amount of import and export as economic indicators, the degree of urbanization, the industrial structure and the level of science and technology as technological indicators, and the degree of opening up to the outside world and the quality of the system as social indicators, and examines the influencing factors of the green investment efficiency from the three dimensions of the economy, society and technology.The SBM model and GML index efficiency measurement show that: from the static time perspective, the regional differences in the efficiency of China's green investment in RCEP partner countries are obvious; from the dynamic time perspective, China's green investment efficiency generally shows an upward trend from 2003 to 2021, but it still hasn't reached the optimal state, which is mainly due to the low efficiency of the scale.The Tobit model regression results show that: At the national level, green investment efficiency is positively affected by the level of economic development and government regulation, and negatively affected by the industrial structure, degree of openness and level of urbanization; At the regional level, the influencing factors of green investment efficiency show heterogeneity, and there are differences in the influencing factors of efficiency in different regions. Finally, based on the theoretical analysis and empirical results, this paper puts forward a series of countermeasures and suggestions to improve the efficiency of green investment from the economic level, institutional level and regional level.
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2024-05-31
  • dc.date.oralDefense
  • 2024-05-19
  • dc.relation.citedreferences
  • 1.田江海.绿色经济与绿色投资[M].中国市场出版社,2010版。 2.马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译.人民出版社,2000版。 3.马克思恩格斯全集(第42卷)[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,编译.人民出版社,1979版。 4.怀特海:《过程与实在》[M],周邦宪译,贵阳:贵州人民出版社,2006年科学版),2016,15(04):1-8。 5.郝亮,汪明月,贾蕾等.弥补外部性:从环境经济政策到绿色创新体系——兼论应对中国环境领域主要矛盾的转换[J].环境与可持续发展,2019,44(03):50-55。 6.陈玉玲.生态环境的外部性与环境经济政策[J].经济研究导刊,2014,(16):291-292+300。 7.牛文元.可持续发展理论的内涵认知——纪念联合国里约环发大会20周年[J].中国人口资源与环境,2012,22(05):9-14。 8.杨超,覃娟.RCEP背景下中国与东盟绿色发展合作研究[J].广西社会科学,2022,(09):80-86。 9.中华人民共和国国务院新闻办公室.新时代的中国绿色发展[N].人民日报,2023-01-20(007)。 10.夏勇.当代投资新走向──绿色投资[J].鄂州大学学报,1999,(02):33-35。 11.王天山.试析美国《1930年关税法》修正案——反补贴法律的溯及性以及双重救济问题的发展[J].公民与法(法学版),2012,(08):56-58。 12.郭捷,刘相汝,朱璧和.“双碳”目标下的绿色投资:文献述评与研究展望[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2024,23(01):105-113。 13.李剑玲,黄海峰.论中国绿色投资管理[J].再生资源与循环经济,2012,5(04):15-19。 14.任相伟,孙丽文.绿色经济的内涵、演化逻辑及推进路径——基于经济——生态——社会复杂系统视角[J].技术经济与管理研究,2020,(02):88-93。 15.黄森,呙小明.我国对“中欧班列”沿线国家绿色投资效率评价及影响因素研究——基于SBM- undesirable模型与空间计量模型的结合[J].国际商务研究,2018,39(06):5-16。 16.张大为,黄秀丽.产业政策、内外部治理与企业绿色投资[J].财会通讯,2023,(24):53-56+82。 17.莫凌水,翟永平,张俊杰.“一带一路”绿色投资标尺和绿色成本效益核算[J].中国人民大学学报,2019,33(04):23-35。 18.赵领娣,王小飞.企业绿色投资及绿色费用能否提升经营绩效?——基于EBM和面板Tobit模型的经验分析[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2022,24(03):28-42。 19.李根忠,朱洪亮.基于三阶段SBM-DEA-Malmquist指数的长江经济带碳排放效率研究[J].运筹与管理,2022,31(06):161-167。 20.贾铠箫.要素市场价格扭曲对绿色全要素生产率的影响研究[D].新疆财经大学,2022。 21.任保全.技术创新、市场需求与石油石化产业生产率动态演变——基于江苏上市公司的Malmquist指数法[J].常州大学学报(社会科学版),2017,18(06):89-99。 22.田玉敏.径向集中式DEA模型的效率研究[J].佳木斯大学学报(自然科学版),2010,28(04): 593-594+597。 23.王文,杨凡欣.“一带一路”与中国对外投资的绿色化进程[J].中国人民大学学报,2019,33(04):10-22。 24.王学敏,杨磊.基于SBM模型的新疆农业绿色全要素生产率评价研究[J].现代农业科技,2023, (22):171-175。 25.方杏村,陈浩.经济增长和环境污染的动态关系及其区域差异——基于资源枯竭型城市面板数据的实证分析[J].生态经济,2015,31(06):49-52。 26.杜雯翠,张平淡.新常态下的经济增长与环境污染——来自新兴经济体国家的经验证据[J].软科学,2015,29(10):20-23+38。 27.朱静.“一带一路”战略下中国对中亚五国绿色投资的影响测度分析[J].经济研究导刊,2018, (02):123-126。 28.崔秀梅.企业绿色投资的驱动机制及其实现路径——基于价值创造的分析[J].江海学刊,2013, (3):85-91。 29.中国人民银行济南分行课题组,张立光.山东参与“一带一路”经贸合作的绿色投资风险及政策建议[J].金融发展研究,2019,(12):63-68。 30.刘霞.中国引领全球可再生能源投资,能源目标加速实现[J].新能源科技,2022,(10):1-2。 31.夏启繁.中国对RCEP国家能源投资布局与风险的时空特征[J]. 世界地理研究,2022,31(4): 814-826。 32.曾文革,王怡. 中国——东盟《投资协议》实施探究.经济问题探索,2010(4):147-151。 33.张国旺. 中国——东盟自由贸易区:进程与动因. 经济研究导刊,2013(22):265-267。 34.王杨堃.设施联通提升RCEP经济价值[J].中国投资(中英文),2020(Z5):53-54。 35.文春晖,马凯玲.RCEP成员国农业投资环境评价及投资对策研究[J].对外经贸实务,2023, (05):64-76。 36.Inderst, G., Kaminker, Ch. & Stewart, F., 2012, Defining and Measuring Green Investments: Implications for Institutional Investors‟ Asset Allocations”, OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions, No.24, OECD Publishing. 37.IRENA, 2023, Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2022, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. 38.Acemoglu, D., & Guerrieri, V., 2008, Capital Deepening and Nonbalanced Economic Growth. Journal of political Economy, 116(3), pp.467-498. 39.Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E.,1978, Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European journal of operational research, 2(6), pp.429-444. 40.Cropper, M. & Griffiths, C., 1994, The Interaction of Population Growth and Environmental Quality. The American Economic Review, 84(2), pp.250-254. 41.Czakó, V., 2012, Evolution of Hungarian Residential Energy Efficiency Support Programmes: Road to and Operation Under the Green Investment Scheme. Energy efficiency, 5(2), pp.163-178. 42.Du, K., Li, P., & Yan, Z., 2019, Do Green Technology Innovations Contribute to Carbon Dioxide Emission Reduction? Empirical Evidence From Patent Data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, pp.146, 297-303. 43.Elkington, J., 1998, Partnerships from Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st‐Century Business. Environmental quality management, 8(1), pp.37-51. 44.Eyraud, L., Wane, M. A., Zhang, M. C., & Clements, M. B. J., 2011, Who's Going Green and Why? Trends and Determinants of Green Investment. IMF working papers, 11. 45.Farrell, M. J., 1957, The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 120(3), pp.253-281. 46.Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. K., Schmidt, S. S., & Yaisawarng, S., 2002, Accounting for Environmental Effects and Statistical Noise in Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of productivity Analysis, 17, pp.157-174. 47.Guerrieri, P., Luciani, M., & Meliciani, V., 2011, The Determinants of Investment in Information and Communication Technologies. Economics of Innovation and new Technology, 20(4), pp.387-403. 48.Hite, D., Hudson, D., & Intarapapong, W., 2002,. Willingness to Pay For Water Quality Improvements: The Case of Precision Application Technology. Journal of Agricultural and resource Economics, pp.433-449. 49.Karásek, J., & Pavlica, J., 2016, Green Investment Scheme: Experience and Results in The Czech Republic. Energy Policy, 90, pp.121-130. 50.Kusumastuti RD, Van Donk DP, Teunter R., 2016, Crop-Related Harvesting and Processing Planning: a Review. International Journal of Production Economics, 174, pp.76-92. 51.Kalirajan K, Liu Y., 2016, Renewable Energy Trade within Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) Countries: An Exploratory Analysis. Aust. S. Asia Res. Cent, 5, pp. 2016-09. 52.Bashir M F, Benjiang M A, Hussain H I, et al.,2022, Evaluating Environmental Commitments to COP21 and The Role of Economic Complexity, Renewable Energy, Financial Development, Urbanization, and Energy Innovation: Empirical Evidence from the RCEP Countries[J]. Renewable Energy, 184: 541-550. 53.Latif, Y., Shunqi, G., Fareed, Z., Ali, S., & Bashir, M. A., 2023, Do Financial Development and Energy Efficiency Ensure Green Environment? Evidence From RCEP Economies. Economic research-Ekonomska istraživanja, 36(1), 51-72. 54.Liyun Liu, Zhenzhi Zhao, Mingming Zhang, Dequn Zhou, 2022, Green Investment Efficiency in The Chinese Energy Sector: Overinvestment or Underinvestment?,Energy Policy,Volume 160,112694,ISSN 0301-4215. 55.Lee, K.-H., & Min, B., 2015, Green R&D For Eco-Innovation and Its Impact on Carbon Emissions and Firm Performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 534-542. 56.Magalhães, N., 2021, The Green Investment Paradigm: Another Headlong Rush. Ecological Economics, 190, 107209. 57.Martin, P. R., & Moser, D. V., 2016, Managers’ Green Investment Disclosures and Investors’ Reaction. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 239-254. 58.Mengistu, A. A., & Adhikary, B. K., 2011, Does Good Governance Matter for FDI Inflows? Evidence from Asian Economies. Asia Pacific business review, 17(3), 281-299. 59.Newell, R. G., Jaffe, A. B., & Stavins, R. N., 2010, The Induced Innovation Hypothesis and Energy-Saving Technological Change. In Technological change and the environment (pp. 97-126). Routledge. 60.Drysdale P, Armstrong S, 2021, RCEP: a Strategic Opportunity For Multilateralism[J]. China Economic Journal, 14(2): 128-143. 61.North, D. C., & Thomas, R. P., 1973, The Rise of The Western World: A New Economic History. Cambridge university press. 62.Popp, D., 2002, Induced Innovation and Energy Prices. American economic review, 92(1), 160-180. 63.Sabir, S., & Zahid, K., 2012, Macroeconomic Policies and Business Cycle: The Role of Institutions in Selected Saarc Countries. The Pakistan Development Review, 147-158. 64.Selden, T. M., & Song, D., 1994, Environmental Quality and Development: Is There a Kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emissions? Journal of Environmental Economics and management, 27(2), 147-162. 65.Stiglitz, J. E., 1998, Knowledge for Development: Economic Science, Economic Policy and Economic Advice. Annual World Bank conference on development economics, 9-58. 66.Stokey, N. L., 1998, Are There Limits to Growth? International economic review, 1-31. 67.Tone K., 2001, A Slacks-Based Measure of Efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis. European journal of operational research.130(3): 498-509. 68.Wang Y, Xu A, 2023, Green Investments and Development of Renewable Energy Projects: Evidence From 15 RCEP Member Countries. Renewable Energy.211: 1045-1050. 69.Zhang, C., Wang, Z., 2023, Analysis of Spatiotemporal Difference and Driving Factors of Green Total Factor Energy Efficiency in RCEP Members: Insights from SBM-GML and Tobit Models. Environ Sci- Pollut Res 30, 15623–15640.  70.Zhang C, Chen P., 2022, Applying The Three-Stage SBM-DEA Model to Evaluate Energy Efficiency and Impact Factors In RCEP Countries. Energy,241: 122917. 71.Zeng Y, Guo W, Wang H, et al., 2020, A Two-Stage Evaluation and Optimization Method for Renewable Energy Development Based on Data Envelopment Analysis. Applied Energy, 262: 114363.
回到顶部