诚实信用原则在劳动合同纠纷中的司法适用研究

The Principle of Good Faith in Labour Contract DisputesStudy on Judicial Application

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

作者:

李俊楠

摘要:

和谐劳动关系的构建离不开诚信观的树立,而诚信观的树立要求在相关司法裁判中正确适用诚实信用原则,但鉴于劳动法不同于传统私法的特殊性以及诚实信用原则的抽象性、道德性,在劳动合同纠纷司法实践中对该原则的适用还存在诸多问题尚待解决。 文章第一、二章通过对样本裁判的统计分析,总结概括出目前劳动合同纠纷中适用诚实信用原则的方式、具体的运用场景等适用样态并发现所存在的适用问题。其一,适用方式包括作为裁判论证前提、作为行为评价工具、作为合同解释原则、直接作为裁判依据、多种方式并用等五种方式。其二,运用场景方面,样本案例对诚实信用原则的适用涵盖劳动关系全过程,包含劳动合同订立、履行到终止的各个阶段。其三,适用问题方面,样本案例体现出对诚实信用原则的适用存在着适用前提不明确、适用方式不规范等问题。 文章第三部分针对上述司法适用问题,从制度、理论以及司法三个层面探讨问题产生的根源,得出问题产生的原因主要有以下三点:第一,对诚实信用原则与劳动法之间的关系把握不明。第二,对劳动法中的诚实信用原则认识不足。第三,对诚实信用原则的适用条件不设限制。为解决上述问题,文章第四部分于理论层面进行分析,并在现有理论的基础上提出以下观点:第一,诚实信用原则应扩张适用至劳动合同全过程。第二,劳动法中的诚实信用原则应当以平衡劳动关系双方利益,实现劳动法规范效果合理化为首要目标。第三,诚实信用原则所保护的当事人利益应当劣后于劳动法所保护的底线性利益,对于劳动法保护的其他利益,诚实信用原则可充当当事人利益诉求的合理性检验工具。 最后,回归到司法实践,本文提出在涉及诚实信用原则的案件中,应当首先对违背诚信的行为与劳动关系是否相关以及是否有适用诚实信用原则的优先性进行审查判断,再确定应当适用诚实信用原则后再根据具体的情况选择合适的方式进行适用的思路进行。

语种:

中文

提交日期

2024-06-13

引用参考

李俊楠. 诚实信用原则在劳动合同纠纷中的司法适用研究[D]. 西南政法大学,2024.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 诚实信用原则在劳动合同纠纷中的司法适用研究
  • dc.title
  • The Principle of Good Faith in Labour Contract DisputesStudy on Judicial Application
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20210351011360
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 李俊楠
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 经济法学院(生态法学院)
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法律硕士专业学位
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2024
  • dc.contributor.direction
  • 劳动法
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 胡大武
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 经济法学院(生态法学院)
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 诚实信用原则,劳动合同纠纷,司法适用
  • dc.subject
  • The Principle of Good Faith;Labour contract disputes ; Judicial application
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 和谐劳动关系的构建离不开诚信观的树立,而诚信观的树立要求在相关司法裁判中正确适用诚实信用原则,但鉴于劳动法不同于传统私法的特殊性以及诚实信用原则的抽象性、道德性,在劳动合同纠纷司法实践中对该原则的适用还存在诸多问题尚待解决。 文章第一、二章通过对样本裁判的统计分析,总结概括出目前劳动合同纠纷中适用诚实信用原则的方式、具体的运用场景等适用样态并发现所存在的适用问题。其一,适用方式包括作为裁判论证前提、作为行为评价工具、作为合同解释原则、直接作为裁判依据、多种方式并用等五种方式。其二,运用场景方面,样本案例对诚实信用原则的适用涵盖劳动关系全过程,包含劳动合同订立、履行到终止的各个阶段。其三,适用问题方面,样本案例体现出对诚实信用原则的适用存在着适用前提不明确、适用方式不规范等问题。 文章第三部分针对上述司法适用问题,从制度、理论以及司法三个层面探讨问题产生的根源,得出问题产生的原因主要有以下三点:第一,对诚实信用原则与劳动法之间的关系把握不明。第二,对劳动法中的诚实信用原则认识不足。第三,对诚实信用原则的适用条件不设限制。为解决上述问题,文章第四部分于理论层面进行分析,并在现有理论的基础上提出以下观点:第一,诚实信用原则应扩张适用至劳动合同全过程。第二,劳动法中的诚实信用原则应当以平衡劳动关系双方利益,实现劳动法规范效果合理化为首要目标。第三,诚实信用原则所保护的当事人利益应当劣后于劳动法所保护的底线性利益,对于劳动法保护的其他利益,诚实信用原则可充当当事人利益诉求的合理性检验工具。 最后,回归到司法实践,本文提出在涉及诚实信用原则的案件中,应当首先对违背诚信的行为与劳动关系是否相关以及是否有适用诚实信用原则的优先性进行审查判断,再确定应当适用诚实信用原则后再根据具体的情况选择合适的方式进行适用的思路进行。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The construction of harmonious labor relation is inseparable from the establishment of The Principle of Good Faith, and the establishment of The Principle of Good Faith require the correct application of The Principle of Good Faith in the relevant judicial adjudication. However, in view of the particularity of labor law, which is different from the traditional private law, and the abstractness and morality of The Principle of Good Faith, there are still many problems to be solved in the judicial practice of the application of the principle in labor contract disputes. The article chapter 1 and chapter 2 through the statistical analysis of the sample adjudication, this paper summarized the applicable way and scene of The Principle of Good Faith in the current labor contract disputes, and found the existing problems.First, the applicable way includes five ways: as the premise of the adjudication argument, as the behavior evaluation tool, as the contract interpretation principle, directly as the basis of the adjudication, and apply with a variety of methods.Second, in terms of application scenarios, the application of The Principle of Good Faith in the sample cases cover the whole process of labor relations, Include the labor contract conclusion, performance to the termination of each stage.Third, in terms of application problems, the sample cases reflect that the application of The Principle of Good Faith has problems such as unclear application premise and non-standard application method. The third part of the article aims at the above judicial application issues, from the system, theory and judicial three levels to explore the root causes of the problem.The main reasons for the problem are as follows: first, the relationship between The Principle of Good Faith and labor law is not clear.Second, the understanding of The Principle of Good Faith in the labor law is not enough.Third, the application conditions of The Principle of Good Faith are not limited. In order to solve the above problems,the fourth part of the paper analyzes at the theoretical level,And put forward the following ideas on the basis of the existing theories: first, The Principle of Good Faith should be extended to the whole process of the labor contract;second,The Principle of Good Faith in the labor law should be to balance the interests of both parties in the labor relationship, to achieve the rationalization of the effect of the labor law as the primary goal.Third, the interests of the parties protected by The Principle of Good Faith should be inferior to the bottom line interests protected by the labor law. for the protection of other interests of the labor law, The Principle of Good Faith can serve as a reasonable test tool. Finally, returning to judicial practice, this paper proposes that in cases involving the principle of good faith, it should first review and judge whether the behaviors violating The Principle of Good Faith are relevant to the labor relationship and whether the priority of the application of The Principle of Good Faith is applicable, and then determine whether The Principle of Good Faith should be applied and then choose the appropriate way to apply the principle according to the specific situation.
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2024-06-13
  • dc.date.oralDefense
  • 2024-05-26
回到顶部