刑罚退出机制如何实现——从对积极刑法观的反思切入

How the Punishment Withdrawal Mechanism is implemented:Starting from the Reflection on the Positive Criminal Law View

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

陈伟

归属院系：

法学院

作者：

陈伟1,2

摘要：

积极刑法观系刑法面向社会生活呈现自我的体现，具有双重面相，一方面强调刑罚的预防性功能，体现了刑法希望通过规范引导实现社会秩序治理的价值追求，另一方面也带来了刑罚扩张化的现实趋向，拓宽了刑罚适用的口径与实践可能，需要谨防过度积极所致的权益保障缺失与混同前置法适用的潜在风险，这铺垫出刑罚退出机制出场的现实背景。刑罚退出机制以刑罚的独立品格为立论基点，通过该当且必要的刑罚来重新审视罪刑关系，确保刑罚适用在泛化扩张情形下的理性限缩。刑罚退出机制有赖于司法的路径实现，在犯罪认定中注重刑罚对犯罪成立的限定价值，防范以形式罪状的符合性取代犯罪评价的综合审查，注重对积极刑法框架下的入罪限制考察；在刑罚裁量中不随意以竞合论回归重刑，加大非监禁刑的适用空间，完善量刑过程与量刑说理，激活酌定减轻制度的适用。

语种：

中文

出版日期：

2023-08-10

学科：

法学

收录：

北大核心期刊; CSSCI; 中国科技核心期刊

提交日期：

2023-10-10

引用参考：

陈伟. 刑罚退出机制如何实现——从对积极刑法观的反思切入[J]. 社会科学,2023(08):166-178.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 刑罚退出机制如何实现——从对积极刑法观的反思切入
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 陈伟
  • dc.contributor.author
  • CHEN Wei
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学法学院;重庆市新型犯罪研究中心
  • dc.publisher
  • 社会科学
  • dc.publisher
  • Journal of Social Sciences
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2023
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 08
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • No.516
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 166-178
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2023-08-10
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 积极刑法观;刑罚退出;刑事法治;刑罚机能
  • dc.subject
  • Positive Criminal Law View;Withdrawal of Penalty;Criminal Rule of Law;Penalty Function
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 积极刑法观系刑法面向社会生活呈现自我的体现，具有双重面相，一方面强调刑罚的预防性功能，体现了刑法希望通过规范引导实现社会秩序治理的价值追求，另一方面也带来了刑罚扩张化的现实趋向，拓宽了刑罚适用的口径与实践可能，需要谨防过度积极所致的权益保障缺失与混同前置法适用的潜在风险，这铺垫出刑罚退出机制出场的现实背景。刑罚退出机制以刑罚的独立品格为立论基点，通过该当且必要的刑罚来重新审视罪刑关系，确保刑罚适用在泛化扩张情形下的理性限缩。刑罚退出机制有赖于司法的路径实现，在犯罪认定中注重刑罚对犯罪成立的限定价值，防范以形式罪状的符合性取代犯罪评价的综合审查，注重对积极刑法框架下的入罪限制考察；在刑罚裁量中不随意以竞合论回归重刑，加大非监禁刑的适用空间，完善量刑过程与量刑说理，激活酌定减轻制度的适用。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The positive criminal law view is the embodiment of the criminal law's self-presentation towards social life, which has a two-folded dimension: on the one hand, it emphasizes the preventive function of criminal punishment, and reflects the value pursuit of criminal law to realize the governance of social order through normative guidance; on the other, it has brought about the realistic trend of penalty expansion, broadened the scope and practical possibility of penalty application. We need to beware of the lack of protection of rights and interests caused by excessive enthusiasm and the potential risk of confusing the application of pre-law, which paves the way for the realistic background of the emergence of the penalty withdrawal mechanism. The penalty withdrawal mechanism takes the independent character of the penalty as the starting point and re-examines the relationship between crime and punishment through the proper and necessary penalty to ensure the rational restriction of the application of penalty under the context of extensive expansion. It depends on the realization of the path of judicial practice. In the determination of crime, we should pay attention to the limited value of penalty to the establishment of crime, and prevent the comprehensive review of crime evaluation from being replaced by the conformity of formal crime. In the discretion of punishment, we should not return to heavy punishment with the theory of competition and cooperation at will. Instead, we should expand the applicable space of non-imprisonment punishment, improve the sentencing process and sentencing reasoning, and activate the application of discretionary commutation system.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 20JZD021;17XFX009
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“全面依法治国视域下司法行政职能定位及作用发挥问题研究”(项目编号：20JZD021);国家社会科学基金西部项目“刑罚退出机制的价值确立与实践运行研究”（项目编号：17XFX009）的阶段性成果
  • dc.description.sponsorshipsource
  • 国家社会科学基金
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 31-1112/Z
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 0257-5833
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 1.732
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D914
回到顶部