结算帮助行为司法应对与转型——以电信网络诈骗犯罪为例

Judicial Response and Transformation of Settlement Assistance Behavior——Take telecom network fraud crime as an example

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

梅传强

归属院系:

法学院

作者:

梅传强1 ;隋译锋

摘要:

在电信网络诈骗犯罪中,结算帮助行为多样化、独立化的特征愈发明显,与实行行为建立了协作关系,成为犯罪结果发生的“催化剂”。在司法应对方面,存在着对间接帮助行为的定性分歧、对各个犯罪人刑事责任划分缺少明显区分、入罪金额的认定标准不清等问题,有必要在理论上进行探讨并加以解决。还需要坚持多元治理理念,在犯罪化治理层面,定性时需对结算帮助行为进行类型化分析,量刑时参考“以刑制罪”的思路;在非犯罪化治理层面,完善刑罚的退出机制、优化刑法与前置规范的衔接关系。

语种:

中文

出版日期:

2023-08-15

学科:

法学

提交日期

2023-10-10

引用参考

梅传强;隋译锋. 结算帮助行为司法应对与转型——以电信网络诈骗犯罪为例[J]. 警学研究,2023(04):7-20.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 结算帮助行为司法应对与转型——以电信网络诈骗犯罪为例
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 梅传强;隋译锋
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Mei Chuanqiang;Sui Yifeng;Southwest University of Political Science & Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.publisher
  • 警学研究
  • dc.publisher
  • Police Science Research
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2023
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 04
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • No.191
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 7-20
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2023-08-15
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 电信网络诈骗犯罪;结算帮助;帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪;多元治理
  • dc.subject
  • telecom network fraud crime;settlement assistance;crime of helping information network crime;multiple governance
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 在电信网络诈骗犯罪中,结算帮助行为多样化、独立化的特征愈发明显,与实行行为建立了协作关系,成为犯罪结果发生的“催化剂”。在司法应对方面,存在着对间接帮助行为的定性分歧、对各个犯罪人刑事责任划分缺少明显区分、入罪金额的认定标准不清等问题,有必要在理论上进行探讨并加以解决。还需要坚持多元治理理念,在犯罪化治理层面,定性时需对结算帮助行为进行类型化分析,量刑时参考“以刑制罪”的思路;在非犯罪化治理层面,完善刑罚的退出机制、优化刑法与前置规范的衔接关系。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • In the crime of telecom network fraud, the settlement assistance behavior is diversified and independent, and the cooperative relationship is established with the implementation behavior, which becomes the “catalyst” of the crime. In the judicial response,there are differences in the characterization of indirect assistance behavior, the lack of clear distinction between the criminal responsibility of each offender, and the unclear criteria for the determination of the amount of incrimination. It is necessary to discuss and solve them in theory,adhere to the concept of multiple governance, and at the level of criminalized governance, the characterization of settlement assistance behavior should be analyzed the types, refer to the idea of “affirming a crime by penalty” when sentencing;at the level of decriminalization governance,we should improve the exit mechanism of punishment and optimize the connection between criminal law and pre-norms.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 202221SFB2013
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 2022年度司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目“电信网络诈骗犯罪刑法治理模式完善研究”(21SFB2013)阶段性成果
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 22-1426/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 2096-9880
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.325
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D924.35
回到顶部