少捕慎押的实现路径探析

On the Path to Fewer and Cautious Detention

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

李昌林

归属院系:

法学院

作者:

李昌林1 ;向天驰

摘要:

少捕慎诉慎押刑事司法政策包含了逮捕和公诉两个方面的政策。树立尊重和保障人权理念,实现逮捕作为诉讼保全和社会防卫措施的本质回归,是贯彻少捕慎押的前提。公检法机关在提请、批准、决定逮捕过程中,全面、严格把握逮捕条件,落实公安机关对逮捕条件的证明责任,创造听取被追诉人意见的条件,是实现少捕的必由之途。在继续对延长羁押期限进行实质化审查、深入持续开展羁押必要性审查的基础上,落实公检法机关依职权撤销、变更、解除强制措施的职责,切实保障被追诉人申请取保候审和申请变更、解除逮捕的权利,对于实现慎押不可或缺。

语种:

中文

出版日期:

2023-05-19

学科:

法学

收录:

北大核心期刊; CSSCI-E

提交日期

2023-06-07

引用参考

李昌林;向天驰. 少捕慎押的实现路径探析[J]. 河北法学,2023(07):187-200.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 少捕慎押的实现路径探析
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 李昌林;向天驰
  • dc.contributor.author
  • LI Chang-lin;XIANG Tian-chi;Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.publisher
  • 河北法学
  • dc.publisher
  • Hebei Law Science
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2023
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 07
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.41;No.357
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 187-200
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2023-05-19
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 少捕;慎押;逮捕;刑事政策;强制措施;人权保障
  • dc.subject
  • fewer detention;cautious detention;detention;criminal policy;coercive measures;human rights protection
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 少捕慎诉慎押刑事司法政策包含了逮捕和公诉两个方面的政策。树立尊重和保障人权理念,实现逮捕作为诉讼保全和社会防卫措施的本质回归,是贯彻少捕慎押的前提。公检法机关在提请、批准、决定逮捕过程中,全面、严格把握逮捕条件,落实公安机关对逮捕条件的证明责任,创造听取被追诉人意见的条件,是实现少捕的必由之途。在继续对延长羁押期限进行实质化审查、深入持续开展羁押必要性审查的基础上,落实公检法机关依职权撤销、变更、解除强制措施的职责,切实保障被追诉人申请取保候审和申请变更、解除逮捕的权利,对于实现慎押不可或缺。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The criminal judicial policy of “fewer detention, cautious prosecution, and detention” includes the policies of detention and public prosecution. Establishing the concept of respecting and protecting human rights and recognizing detention as a litigation preservation and social defense measure are prerequisites for implementing the principle of “fewer and cautious detention.” In the process of requesting, approving, and deciding on detention, the public security organs, people's procuratorates, and people' s courts should fully and strictly grasp the conditions of detention, implement the burden of proof of the public security organs regarding the conditions of arrest, and create opportunities for listening to the opinions of the accused. This is the only way to achieve fewer detentions. To achieve cautious detention, substantive reviews of extending the detention period and continuous assessments of the necessity of detention should continue. Public security organs, people's procuratorates, and people's courts must fulfill their duties to revoke, change, and lift coercive measures according to their functions and powers, while also effectively protecting the accused's rights to apply for bail pending trial, request change, and be released from detention.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 20BFX060;2022XZXS-013
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 国家社会科学基金课题“出罪规范适用问题研究”(20BFX060);西南政法大学学生科研创新项目“出罪规范在起诉阶段的适用研究”(2022XZXS-013)的阶段性成果
  • dc.description.sponsorshipsource
  • 国家社会科学基金
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 13-1023/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1002-3933
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 1.538
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D925.2;D926.3
回到顶部