多元主体参与农村生活垃圾分类治理的行动逻辑——基于四类典型模式的分析

The action logic of multiple subjects participating in the classification and governance of rural domestic waste: Analysis based on four typical models

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

金莹

归属院系：

政治与公共管理学院

作者：

金莹1 ;田昱翌

摘要：

在农村场域中嵌入生活垃圾分类制度对于农村环境治理具有重要意义。我国农村地区在制度嵌入的探索中积累了丰富的治理经验，按照制度推动原动力不同可将现有治理模式分为“政府主导型”“村民自发型”“政企合作型”“多元共治型”四类。据此，在持续追踪网络平台的基础上，选取四种生活垃圾分类治理原动力截然不同的农村，对比剖析典型案例治理进程、技术路径、模式特征及治理经验，提炼出各行为主体深层次的行动逻辑。指出基层政府由因高位推动带来行政压力，被动推进转为追求个人政绩主动落实；村干部兼任三重身份承担多重责任；村民分类行为受综合激励链影响差异化遵循“四环节”逻辑；企业在两种委托代理关系中理性逐利，由此提出农村地区生活垃圾分类经验借鉴的实践应针对参与主体不同的行动逻辑，强化按需激励，以实现农村生活垃圾分类先进经验的有效推广和运用。

语种：

中文

出版日期：

2023-04-16

学科：

环境科学与工程; 政治学; 公共管理

收录：

CSSCI-E

提交日期：

2023-05-24

引用参考：

金莹;田昱翌. 多元主体参与农村生活垃圾分类治理的行动逻辑——基于四类典型模式的分析[J]. 重庆社会科学,2023(04):94-109.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 多元主体参与农村生活垃圾分类治理的行动逻辑——基于四类典型模式的分析
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 金莹;田昱翌
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Jin Ying;Tian Yuyi;Politics and Public Administration College Southwest University of Political Science& Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学政治与公共管理学院
  • dc.contributor.corresponding
  • 田昱翌
  • dc.publisher
  • 重庆社会科学
  • dc.publisher
  • Chongqing Social Sciences
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2023
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 04
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • No.341
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 94-109
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2023-04-16
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 农村生活垃圾分类;制度原动力;治理模式;行动逻辑
  • dc.subject
  • Rural domestic waste classification;institutional source power;governance model;action logic
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 在农村场域中嵌入生活垃圾分类制度对于农村环境治理具有重要意义。我国农村地区在制度嵌入的探索中积累了丰富的治理经验，按照制度推动原动力不同可将现有治理模式分为“政府主导型”“村民自发型”“政企合作型”“多元共治型”四类。据此，在持续追踪网络平台的基础上，选取四种生活垃圾分类治理原动力截然不同的农村，对比剖析典型案例治理进程、技术路径、模式特征及治理经验，提炼出各行为主体深层次的行动逻辑。指出基层政府由因高位推动带来行政压力，被动推进转为追求个人政绩主动落实；村干部兼任三重身份承担多重责任；村民分类行为受综合激励链影响差异化遵循“四环节”逻辑；企业在两种委托代理关系中理性逐利，由此提出农村地区生活垃圾分类经验借鉴的实践应针对参与主体不同的行动逻辑，强化按需激励，以实现农村生活垃圾分类先进经验的有效推广和运用。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Embedding the domestic waste classification system in rural areas is of great significance for rural environmental governance.Our country's rural areas have accumulated rich governance experience in the exploration of institutional embeddedness. According to the different sources of institutional driving force, the existing governance models can be divided into four categories: "government-led", "village self-initiated", "government-enterprise cooperation" and "multiple co-governance".Accordingly, on the basis of continuously tracking the network platform, four types of rural areas with completely different sources of domestic waste classification and governance were selected.The typical case governance process, technical path, model characteristics and governance experience are compared and analyzed, and the deep-level action logic of each actor is extracted.It is pointed out that the grass-roots government has changed from passive promotion due to administrative pressure brought about by superiors to active implementation in pursuit of personal performance;The triple identity of village cadres bears multiple responsibilities;The differentiation of villagers' classified behavior follows the logic of "four links"; enterprises are mainly driven by economic benefits and brand effects.Therefore, it is proposed that in practice, according to the different action logics of participating subjects, on-demand incentives should be strengthened to achieve multi-link and full-process long-term governance of rural domestic waste classification.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 2021NDYB065
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 重庆市社会科学规划项目“重庆市乡风文明建设与乡村文化人才的互动逻辑与路径研究”（2021NDYB065）
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 50-1168/C
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1673-0186
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 1.77
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • X799.3;D422.6
回到顶部