品牌意义的符号学研究范式:回顾、应用与展望

Semiotic Research Paradigm of Brand Meaning:Review, Application and Prospect

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

张燚 ; 刘进平

作者:

张燚1 ;丁润 ; 刘进平3

摘要:

品牌是携带意义的一种符号。作为一门研究意义的学科,符号学为品牌意义的创建、解读以及消费者行为研究提供了强大的理论分析工具,能够帮助研究人员探寻品牌意义的内在结构及其生成、传递与解读的机理。目前,品牌意义的符号学研究范式主要有结构主义和实用主义两大范式,其中结构主义符号学范式包括索绪尔的二元对立理论、格雷马斯的符号矩阵、巴特和列维-施特劳斯的神话符号学等;实用主义符号学范式包括皮尔斯的三元符号论和符号三分法、雅各布森的传播六要素与语言六功能以及转喻和隐喻理论、米德的符号互动论等。本研究通过梳理发现两大范式在研究对象、应用范围、研究方法、涉及学科等方面存在差异。结构主义范式主要聚焦于意义的结构、维度及其背后的文化语境,有助于揭示意义是如何由内部要素彼此关联来构建与表达的,从而更好地诠释现象。在品牌意义的研究领域,结构主义范式可以通过结合语言学、人类学等学科的相关理论,运用质性研究方法来探讨品牌的价值与意义维度以及文化符号功能。实用主义范式则主要聚焦于意义的创造、传递与解读过程,强调意义传播的过程机制而非解读意义本身的内涵,有助于揭示意义创造、传递与解读的过程机制。在品牌意义的研究领域,实用主义范式可以通过结合语言学、社会学、心理学等学科的相关理论,运用质性或量化研究方法来探讨品牌相关要素的表意机制、品牌意义的消费者解读机制以及不同主体之间的互动机制等。未来应着重加强品牌意义的生成机制与关键操作、品牌意义的社会互动与数字共创、中华优秀传统文化更好赋能自主品牌符号意义建构与符号价值提升等议题的研究。

语种:

中文

出版日期:

2023-02-20

学科:

中国语言文学; 应用经济学; 新闻传播学

提交日期:

2023-04-26

引用参考:

张燚;丁润;刘进平. 品牌意义的符号学研究范式:回顾、应用与展望[J]. 四川轻化工大学学报(社会科学版),2023(01):1-26.

全文附件授权许可:

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 品牌意义的符号学研究范式:回顾、应用与展望
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 张燚;丁润;刘进平
  • dc.contributor.author
  • ZHANG Yi;DING Run;LIU Jinping;School of Journalism & Communication, Southwest University of Political Science & Law;Business School, Southwest University of Political Science & Law;Scientific Research Office, Southwest University of Political Science & Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学新闻传播学院;西南政法大学商学院;西南政法大学科研处
  • dc.publisher
  • 四川轻化工大学学报(社会科学版)
  • dc.publisher
  • Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2023
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 01
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.38;No.177
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 1-26
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2023-02-20
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 品牌意义;品牌符号;结构主义符号学;实用主义符号学;研究范式
  • dc.subject
  • brand meaning;brand symbol;structural semiotics;pragmatic semiotics;research paradigm
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 品牌是携带意义的一种符号。作为一门研究意义的学科,符号学为品牌意义的创建、解读以及消费者行为研究提供了强大的理论分析工具,能够帮助研究人员探寻品牌意义的内在结构及其生成、传递与解读的机理。目前,品牌意义的符号学研究范式主要有结构主义和实用主义两大范式,其中结构主义符号学范式包括索绪尔的二元对立理论、格雷马斯的符号矩阵、巴特和列维-施特劳斯的神话符号学等;实用主义符号学范式包括皮尔斯的三元符号论和符号三分法、雅各布森的传播六要素与语言六功能以及转喻和隐喻理论、米德的符号互动论等。本研究通过梳理发现两大范式在研究对象、应用范围、研究方法、涉及学科等方面存在差异。结构主义范式主要聚焦于意义的结构、维度及其背后的文化语境,有助于揭示意义是如何由内部要素彼此关联来构建与表达的,从而更好地诠释现象。在品牌意义的研究领域,结构主义范式可以通过结合语言学、人类学等学科的相关理论,运用质性研究方法来探讨品牌的价值与意义维度以及文化符号功能。实用主义范式则主要聚焦于意义的创造、传递与解读过程,强调意义传播的过程机制而非解读意义本身的内涵,有助于揭示意义创造、传递与解读的过程机制。在品牌意义的研究领域,实用主义范式可以通过结合语言学、社会学、心理学等学科的相关理论,运用质性或量化研究方法来探讨品牌相关要素的表意机制、品牌意义的消费者解读机制以及不同主体之间的互动机制等。未来应着重加强品牌意义的生成机制与关键操作、品牌意义的社会互动与数字共创、中华优秀传统文化更好赋能自主品牌符号意义建构与符号价值提升等议题的研究。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • A brand is a symbol that carries meaning. As a discipline that studies meaning, semiotics provides a powerful theoretical analysis tool for the creation and interpretation of brand meaning and the study of consumer behavior, and can help researchers explore the inner structure of brand meaning and the mechanisms of its generation, transmission and interpretation. At present, there are two major semiotic research paradigms for brand meaning, structuralism and pragmatism, among which structuralist semiotic paradigms include Saussure's binary opposition theory, Grimes' semiotic square, Barthes' and Levi-Strauss' mythological semiotics, etc.. Pragmatist semiotic paradigms include Peirce's triadic semiotic theory and semiotic trichotomy, Jacobson's six elements of communication and six functions of language and Jacobson's theory of metonymy and metaphor, and Mead's theory of symbolic interactionism.This study finds out that there are differences between the two paradigms in terms of research objects,scope of application, research methods, and disciplines involved. The structuralist paradigm focuses on the structure and dimension of meaning and the cultural context behind it, which can help researchers reveal how meaning is constructed and expressed by internal elements related to each other, so as to better interpret phenomena. In the field of brand meaning research, the structuralist paradigm can be used to explore the value and meaning dimensions of brands and their cultural symbolic functions by combining theories from linguistics, anthropology and other disciplines and using qualitative research methods. The pragmatist paradigm focuses on the process of meaning creation, transmission and interpretation, emphasizing the process mechanism of meaning transmission rather than the connotation of interpreting meaning itself, which can help researchers reveal the process mechanism of meaning creation, transmission and interpretation. In the field of brand meaning research, the pragmatic paradigm can explore the ideational mechanism of brand-related elements, the consumer interpretation mechanism of brand meaning and the interaction mechanism between different subjects by combining relevant theories from linguistics, sociology, psychology and other disciplines and using qualitative or quantitative research methods. In the future, we should focus on strengthening the research on the generation mechanism and key operation of brand meaning, social interaction and digital co-creation of brand meaning, and the construction of symbolic meaning and symbolic value enhancement of autonomous brands by better empowerment of Chinese excellent traditional culture.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 22BXW086
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 国家社会科学基金项目(22BXW086)
  • dc.description.sponsorshipsource
  • 国家社会科学基金
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 51-1793/C
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 2096-7535
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 1.389
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • H0-05;F273.2
回到顶部