新中国法律渊源研究变迁与启示

The Change and Enlightenment of the Research on the legal Origin of New China

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

付子堂

作者:

付子堂1 ;代瑞婷

摘要:

新中国成立以来,我国法理学界对法律渊源的研究具有三个发展脉络。第一脉络为“立法渊源说”(始于20世纪80年代)。这一脉络法律渊源学说呈现“本质渊源说”“表现形式说”“效力渊源说”和“混合渊源说”的发展逻辑。第二脉络为“司法渊源说”(始于20世纪90年代)。法律渊源学说从“法官法源说”精细化为“权威理由说”。第三脉络为“综合渊源说”(始于21世纪)。学界从立法和司法双重角度分析法律渊源价值和具体规范的法律渊源属性。回顾新中国法律渊源研究历程,可以发现,法律渊源研究始终围绕“法律渊源与法的表现形式”“法律渊源与法律方法”“法律渊源与法”核心争论点。法律渊源研究受国家法治建设发展影响、得益于国外法源理论且与学者研究视域有关,研究视角从法律渊源地位转为法律渊源适用,法律渊源内部理论逻辑与实践品性也逐渐完善。展望未来,法律渊源研究范式应超越制定法本位,研究场域囊括法治实践,研究目标致力于法律渊源体系,以构建实践性法律渊源理论。

语种:

中文

出版日期:

2022-12-20

学科:

法学

收录:

北大核心期刊; CSSCI-E

提交日期

2023-03-27

引用参考

付子堂;代瑞婷. 新中国法律渊源研究变迁与启示[J]. 河北法学,2023(01):2-22.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 新中国法律渊源研究变迁与启示
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 付子堂;代瑞婷
  • dc.contributor.author
  • FU Zi-tang;DAI Rui-ting;School of Administrative Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学行政法学院
  • dc.publisher
  • 河北法学
  • dc.publisher
  • Hebei Law Science
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2023
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 01
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.41;No.351
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 2-22
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2022-12-20
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 法律渊源;法律渊源学说;法律渊源性质;法律渊源适用;法治实践
  • dc.subject
  • legal origin;theory of legal origin;nature of legal source;application of source of law;the rule of law practice
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 新中国成立以来,我国法理学界对法律渊源的研究具有三个发展脉络。第一脉络为“立法渊源说”(始于20世纪80年代)。这一脉络法律渊源学说呈现“本质渊源说”“表现形式说”“效力渊源说”和“混合渊源说”的发展逻辑。第二脉络为“司法渊源说”(始于20世纪90年代)。法律渊源学说从“法官法源说”精细化为“权威理由说”。第三脉络为“综合渊源说”(始于21世纪)。学界从立法和司法双重角度分析法律渊源价值和具体规范的法律渊源属性。回顾新中国法律渊源研究历程,可以发现,法律渊源研究始终围绕“法律渊源与法的表现形式”“法律渊源与法律方法”“法律渊源与法”核心争论点。法律渊源研究受国家法治建设发展影响、得益于国外法源理论且与学者研究视域有关,研究视角从法律渊源地位转为法律渊源适用,法律渊源内部理论逻辑与实践品性也逐渐完善。展望未来,法律渊源研究范式应超越制定法本位,研究场域囊括法治实践,研究目标致力于法律渊源体系,以构建实践性法律渊源理论。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Since the founding of New China, the research on legal origin in China's jurisprudential field has had three developmental veins. The first context is “the theory of legislative origin”(started in the 1980 s). This theory presents the logic of “essential origin theory” “expression form theory” “effect origin theory” and “mixed origin theory”. The second context is the “judicial origin theory”(started in the 1990 s). The theory of legal origin has been refined from“Jurist law source theory”to“authority reason theory”. The third context is “the theory of comprehensive origin”(from the 21 st century).The academic circle analyzes the value of legal sources and the attribute of legal sources of specific norms from the perspective of legislation and judicature. Reviewing the history of the research on legal sources in New China, we can find that the research on legal sources has always centered on the core arguments of “legal sources and manifestations of law”, “legal sources and legal methods” and “legal sources and laws”. The research on legal sources is influenced by the development of national rule of law construction, benefits from foreign theories of legal sources, and is related to the research horizons of scholars. The research perspective has changed from the status of legal sources to the application of legal sources, and the internal theoretical logic and practical character of legal sources have gradually improved.Looking into the future, the research paradigm of legal sources should go beyond the formulation of law, and the research field should include the practice of rule of law, and the research goal should be devoted to the system of legal sources, so as to construct practical theory of legal sources.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 7019AFX002;2021XZXS-071
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 国家社会科学基金重点项目“中国法理学研究70年回理与评析”(19AFX002)的阶段性成果;西南政法大学研究生科研创新项目“基于四维价值的法律渊源体系研究”(2021XZXS-071)的阶段性研究成果
  • dc.description.sponsorshipsource
  • 国家社会科学基金
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 13-1023/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1002-3933
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 1.538
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D920.0
回到顶部