生态环境损害预防与救济中的行政代履行：功能定位与规范调适

Prevention of ecological environment damage and administrative substituted fulfillment in relief: Function orientation and norm adaption

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

徐以祥

归属院系：

经济法学院（生态法学院）

作者：

徐以祥1 ;马识途

摘要：

作为保障性行政行为中的间接强制执行，行政代履行在生态环境损害预防与救济中承担的功能为兜底和应急，并为成本回收提供依据。但在现行法框架下，它在生态环境损害预防中作为成本回收依据的功能遭到限缩，其生态环境损害救济功能也在整体上受到削弱。之所以如此，一方面源于司法权的不当扩张挤压了行政权的运行空间，另一方面则源于环境行政代履行有关条款的内生缺陷。要解决上述问题，应选择环境法典作为规范调适的载体，在其中限制司法手段的适用范围，将应急处置定性为行政代履行，明确行政代履行的内容包含生态环境修复。

出版日期：

2022-03-26

学科：

法学

收录：

北大核心期刊; CSSCI

提交日期：

2022-04-21

引用参考：

徐以祥;马识途. 生态环境损害预防与救济中的行政代履行：功能定位与规范调适[J]. 中南大学学报(社会科学版),2022(02):93-105.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 生态环境损害预防与救济中的行政代履行：功能定位与规范调适
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 徐以祥;马识途
  • dc.contributor.author
  • XU Yixiang;MA Shitu;School of Economic Law, Southwest University of Political Science & Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学经济法学院
  • dc.publisher
  • 中南大学学报(社会科学版)
  • dc.publisher
  • Journal of Central South University(Social Sciences)
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2022
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 02
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.28;No.142
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 93-105
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2022-03-26
  • dc.subject
  • 环境行政代履行;生态环境损害预防与救济;应急处置;生态环境修复
  • dc.subject
  • environmental administrative substituted fulfillment;prevention and relief of ecological environment damage;emergency response;ecological environment restoration
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 作为保障性行政行为中的间接强制执行，行政代履行在生态环境损害预防与救济中承担的功能为兜底和应急，并为成本回收提供依据。但在现行法框架下，它在生态环境损害预防中作为成本回收依据的功能遭到限缩，其生态环境损害救济功能也在整体上受到削弱。之所以如此，一方面源于司法权的不当扩张挤压了行政权的运行空间，另一方面则源于环境行政代履行有关条款的内生缺陷。要解决上述问题，应选择环境法典作为规范调适的载体，在其中限制司法手段的适用范围，将应急处置定性为行政代履行，明确行政代履行的内容包含生态环境修复。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • As an indirect compulsory execution, administrative substituted fulfillment serves as a bottom act of remedial and emergent nature in preventing ecological environment damage and in undertaking its function in relief, providing evidence for recovering cost. However, under the current legal framework, its administrative substituted fulfillment function as a basis for cost recovery in preventing ecological environmental damage has been limited, and its relief function in ecological environment damage has also been weakened as a whole. This is because, on the one hand, improper expansion of judicial power has squeezed the operating space of executive power, on the other hand, there exist some inherent defects in the relevant clauses of environmental administrative substituted fulfillment. To solve the above problems, we should choose the environmental code as the carrier of norm adaption, in which the application scope of judicial means should be restricted, emergency response should be defined as substituted fulfillment, and the content of administrative substituted fulfillment should be clarified as including ecological environment restoration.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 16BFX147;20212021XZXS-202
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 国家社科基金一般项目“我国环保产业发展的制度困境与法律对策研究”(16BFX147);重庆市第五批高校优秀人才支持计划项目“环境法律责任主体扩张法律问题研究”;西南政法大学2021年度学生科研创新项目“生态环境损害预防与救济中的行政代履行：功能定位与规范调适”(2021XZXS-202)
  • dc.description.sponsorshipsource
  • 国家社会科学基金
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 43-1393/C
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1672-3104
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.825
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D922.68
回到顶部