审判中心语境下刑事二审的问题研判与路径优化——以Z市中级人民法院近5年二审庭审运行实践为分析样本

Judgment and Path Optimization of Criminal Second Instance in the Context of Trial Center——Taking the Operation Practice of the Second-instance Court Trial in the Z City Intermediate People’s Court in the Past 5 Years as an Analysis Sample

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

李永升

归属院系:

法学院

作者:

李永升1 ;张素敏

摘要:

作为我国刑事司法改革顶层设计的“审判中心”制度,尽管在内涵界定上尚未形成统一认识,但其通过庭审实质化实现对案件事实与法律适用的精准掌控,从而维护被追诉人合法权利成为学界共识。然而,我国当前较低的二审开庭率相对弱化了被追诉人的辩护权。不少国家已确立了二审开庭原则,这种将法律审与事实审相结合的庭审实质化方式,具有一定的借鉴价值。鉴于此,我国有必要对刑事二审庭审程序进行优化:宏观方面——确立以审判为中心的诉讼原则;中观方面——建立二审“以开庭为原则,以不开庭为例外”的制度;微观方面——制定二审开庭的具体措施。

出版日期:

2022-03-15

学科:

法学

收录:

CSSCI-E

提交日期

2022-03-31

引用参考

李永升;张素敏. 审判中心语境下刑事二审的问题研判与路径优化——以Z市中级人民法院近5年二审庭审运行实践为分析样本[J]. 齐鲁学刊,2022(02):96-107.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 审判中心语境下刑事二审的问题研判与路径优化——以Z市中级人民法院近5年二审庭审运行实践为分析样本
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 李永升;张素敏
  • dc.contributor.author
  • LI Yongsheng;ZHANG Sumin;Law school, Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学法学院
  • dc.publisher
  • 齐鲁学刊
  • dc.publisher
  • Qilu Journal
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2022
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 02
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • No.287
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 96-107
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2022-03-15
  • dc.subject
  • 审判中心;刑事二审;问题研判;路径优化
  • dc.subject
  • trial center;criminal second instance;problem research and judgment;path optimization
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 作为我国刑事司法改革顶层设计的“审判中心”制度,尽管在内涵界定上尚未形成统一认识,但其通过庭审实质化实现对案件事实与法律适用的精准掌控,从而维护被追诉人合法权利成为学界共识。然而,我国当前较低的二审开庭率相对弱化了被追诉人的辩护权。不少国家已确立了二审开庭原则,这种将法律审与事实审相结合的庭审实质化方式,具有一定的借鉴价值。鉴于此,我国有必要对刑事二审庭审程序进行优化:宏观方面——确立以审判为中心的诉讼原则;中观方面——建立二审“以开庭为原则,以不开庭为例外”的制度;微观方面——制定二审开庭的具体措施。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • As a top-level design of our country's criminal justice reform, the “trial center” system has not yet formed a unified understanding of its connotation, but it has achieved precise control over the facts of the case and the application of law through the substantiation of the court trial, thereby safeguarding the legal rights of the accused has become an academic consensus. However, our country's current low second-instance court hearing rate relatively weakens the defendant's right to defense. Many countries have established the principle of second-instance trial, and this substantive way of court trial combining legal trial with factual trial has certain reference value. In view of this, it is necessary for our country to optimize the procedure of criminal second-instance trials: macroscopically——establishing the principle of litigation centered on trial; mesoscopically——establishing a system of “trials as the principle and exceptions for non-trials” in the second instance; Micro aspects——formulating specific measures for the second instance trial.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 22XXFZ26;GJ2020B01
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 重庆市新型犯罪研究中心课题“新时代背景下腐败犯罪治理现代化研究”(22XXFZ26);最高人民检察院检察理论研究重点课题“疫情防控背景下的司法政策研究”(GJ2020B01)
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 37-1085/C
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1001-022X
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.412
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D925.2;D926.22
回到顶部