论网络平台数据权属及其竞争法保护

On Data Ownership of Network Platform and Its Protection by Competition Law

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

张建文

作者:

赵梓羽 ; 张建文1

摘要:

网络平台数据的保护应在类型化的基础上进行。单一数据个体并非“谁控制,谁享有”,利用平台上的单一数据个体应满足“合法、正当、必要、不过度、征得用户同意”之原则;对数据资源整体则应肯定网络平台的竞争权益。我国《反不正当竞争法》第2条以其兜底性、包容性的特质,为处理网络平台数据权益保护相关问题提供了可行路径。但司法实践中,在适用一般条款认定不正当竞争行为时往往更侧重于经营者利益损害的认定,而忽视对竞争行为正当性的考察。正确的做法是,应在明确反不正当竞争法作为行为规制法的基础上,以“正当性”作为行为认定的逻辑起点,同时遵循互联网企业动态竞争的经济规律,确立竞争法语境下以消费者利益保护、创新激励等因素为重要考量标准的不正当竞争行为审裁理路。

出版日期:

2021-12-31

学科:

法学

提交日期

2022-03-31

引用参考

赵梓羽;张建文. 论网络平台数据权属及其竞争法保护[J]. 北外法学,2021(02):100-117.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 论网络平台数据权属及其竞争法保护
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 赵梓羽;张建文
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Zhao Ziyu;Zhang Jianwen
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学民商法学院
  • dc.publisher
  • 北外法学
  • dc.publisher
  • BFSU Legal Science
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2021
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 02
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • No.6
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 100-117
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2021-12-31
  • dc.subject
  • 数据资源;权益保护;不正当竞争;竞争行为正当性
  • dc.subject
  • Data Resources;Rights and Interests Protection;Unfair Competition;Legitimacy of Competitive Behavior
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 网络平台数据的保护应在类型化的基础上进行。单一数据个体并非“谁控制,谁享有”,利用平台上的单一数据个体应满足“合法、正当、必要、不过度、征得用户同意”之原则;对数据资源整体则应肯定网络平台的竞争权益。我国《反不正当竞争法》第2条以其兜底性、包容性的特质,为处理网络平台数据权益保护相关问题提供了可行路径。但司法实践中,在适用一般条款认定不正当竞争行为时往往更侧重于经营者利益损害的认定,而忽视对竞争行为正当性的考察。正确的做法是,应在明确反不正当竞争法作为行为规制法的基础上,以“正当性”作为行为认定的逻辑起点,同时遵循互联网企业动态竞争的经济规律,确立竞争法语境下以消费者利益保护、创新激励等因素为重要考量标准的不正当竞争行为审裁理路。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Data protection of network platform should be carried out on the basis of typing. The single data individual is not “whoever controls it shall enjoy it”. The use of a single data individual on the platform shall meet the principles of “legal, legitimate, necessary, not excessive and with the consent of the user”. For data resources as a whole, the competitive rights and interests of the network platform should be affirmed. Article 2 of the Chinese Anti-Unfair Competition Law provides a feasible way to deal with the problems related to the protection of data rights and interests of network platforms with its characteristics of providing a bottom-finding and inclusive nature. However, in judicial practice,when applying the general provisions to the identification of unfair competition acts, more emphasis is often placed on the identification of the damage to the interests of operators, and the investigation of the legitimacy of competition acts is ignored. Should be in the right thing to do is on the basis of clearing Anti-unfair Competition Law as behavior regulation law, take “ legitimacy” as the logical starting point of behavior identification, follow the economic law of internet enterprise dynamic competition at the same time to establish the context of competition law for consumer interest protection, innovation motivation factors such as acts of unfair competition the important considerations of revising and understanding.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 2020MSSS2020016
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 西南政法大学2020年度民商法学院学生科研创新项目“我国司法裁判视野中的企业数据保护”(项目编号:MS—SS2020—016)的阶段性成果
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D922.294
回到顶部