《民法典》离婚冷静期条款的适用原理：内涵与外延

The Applicable Principle of the Cooling-off Period Clause of Divorce in the Civil Code: Connotation and Extension

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

张力

归属院系：

民商法学院（知识产权学院）

作者：

张力1,2

摘要：

离婚冷静期制度的本旨为配偶间真实与完整达成离婚意愿的议约期,由此令双方审慎对待离婚协议的全面协商过程,达致化解婚姻危机、阻遏轻率离婚的价值功用。离婚冷静期内双方权利义务总体不变,但冷静期内存有家庭暴力等威胁因素则应强化彼此人身安全保障义务;双方缔结离婚协议应秉承诚信与审慎义务;日常家事代理权应予限缩;忠诚义务需予维持而同居义务则相对弱化。离婚冷静期一般应限于登记离婚中,诉讼离婚程序因已体现令当事人"冷静"参与的强烈政策导向,故仅在特定情况下即诉讼离婚中的调解离婚可予准用离婚冷静期,且在准用期间上不应一概而论。

出版日期：

2021-12-31

学科：

法学

收录：

CSSCI-E

提交日期：

2022-01-27

引用参考：

张力. 《民法典》离婚冷静期条款的适用原理：内涵与外延[J]. 法治研究,2022(01):36-44.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 《民法典》离婚冷静期条款的适用原理：内涵与外延
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 张力
  • dc.contributor.author
  • ZHANG Li
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学民商法学院;西南政法大学外国家庭与妇女理论研究中心
  • dc.publisher
  • 法治研究
  • dc.publisher
  • Research on Rule of Law
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2022
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 01
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • No.139
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 36-44
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2021-12-31
  • dc.subject
  • 离婚冷静期;权利义务关系;适用范围
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 离婚冷静期制度的本旨为配偶间真实与完整达成离婚意愿的议约期,由此令双方审慎对待离婚协议的全面协商过程,达致化解婚姻危机、阻遏轻率离婚的价值功用。离婚冷静期内双方权利义务总体不变,但冷静期内存有家庭暴力等威胁因素则应强化彼此人身安全保障义务;双方缔结离婚协议应秉承诚信与审慎义务;日常家事代理权应予限缩;忠诚义务需予维持而同居义务则相对弱化。离婚冷静期一般应限于登记离婚中,诉讼离婚程序因已体现令当事人"冷静"参与的强烈政策导向,故仅在特定情况下即诉讼离婚中的调解离婚可予准用离婚冷静期,且在准用期间上不应一概而论。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The original purpose of the divorce cooling-off period system is the negotiation period for the true and complete divorce intention between the spouses. This makes the two parties cautiously treat the overall negotiation process of the divorce agreement, and achieves the value function of resolving the marital crisis and deterring rash divorce. The rights and obligations of both parties remain unchanged during the divorce cooling-off period. However,if there are threats such as domestic violence during the cooling-off period, the personal safety protection obligations of each other should be strengthened; the two parties should uphold the obligation of integrity and prudence when concluding a divorce agreement; daily family agency rights should be limited; The obligation of loyalty needs to be maintained while the obligation of cohabitation is relatively weakened. The divorce cooling-off period should generally be limited to the registration of divorce. Because the litigation divorce procedure has shown a strong policy orientation to make the parties "calmly" participate, it is only allowed to use the divorce cooling-off period under certain circumstances, that is, the mediation divorce in the litigation divorce. The permitted period should not be generalized.
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 青少年法治素养家校协同培养基地资助项目
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 33-1343/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1674-1455
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 1.970
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D923.9
回到顶部