《中美经贸协议》“通知—删除”规则与中国网络版权立法回应

Improvement of the "notice-takedown" rule in China's copyright law under China-US Economic and Trade Agreement

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

陈喆

归属院系：

国际法学院

作者：

陈喆1,2 ;解丽敏

摘要：

《中美经贸协议》"通知—删除"规则对网络版权保护提出了新要求,具体包括突出侵权阻断的时效性要求、对"恶意"提交通知和反通知课以赔偿义务、调整错误通知的归责原则,并将恢复上架等待期设置为二十个工作日等。《中美经贸协议》中的"通知—删除"规则对中国网络版权立法完善形成一定挑战,其转化实施面临着合格通知的标准过于笼统、对"恶意"提交通知和反通知的惩罚措施缺失、"善意"的判断标准模糊、上架等待期的设置缺位等问题。但从长期来看,《中美经贸协议》"通知—删除"规则的内化过程有助于促进该规则的有效运行,推动中国知识产权法制变革,由此,建议应进一步细化有效、合格通知的条件,引入"恶意"错误通知和反通知的惩罚性赔偿制度,明晰"善意"的判断标准,并对"声明未侵权即恢复上架"的规则进行调整。

出版日期：

2021-09-26

学科：

法学

收录：

CSSCI; 中国科技核心期刊

提交日期：

2021-10-21

引用参考：

陈喆;解丽敏. 《中美经贸协议》“通知—删除”规则与中国网络版权立法回应[J]. 中国海商法研究,2021(03):105-112.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 《中美经贸协议》“通知—删除”规则与中国网络版权立法回应
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 陈喆;解丽敏
  • dc.contributor.author
  • CHEN Zhe;XIE Li-min;School of International Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law;China-ASEAN Legal Research Center
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学国际法学院;中国—东盟法律研究中心
  • dc.publisher
  • 中国海商法研究
  • dc.publisher
  • Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2021
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 03
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.32;No.70
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 105-112
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2021-09-26
  • dc.subject
  • 《中美经贸协议》;“通知—删除”规则;网络版权保护;《信息网络传播权保护条例》
  • dc.subject
  • China-US Economic and Trade Agreement;"notice-takedown" rule;network copyright protection;Regulation on the Protection of the Right to Network Dissemination of Information
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 《中美经贸协议》"通知—删除"规则对网络版权保护提出了新要求,具体包括突出侵权阻断的时效性要求、对"恶意"提交通知和反通知课以赔偿义务、调整错误通知的归责原则,并将恢复上架等待期设置为二十个工作日等。《中美经贸协议》中的"通知—删除"规则对中国网络版权立法完善形成一定挑战,其转化实施面临着合格通知的标准过于笼统、对"恶意"提交通知和反通知的惩罚措施缺失、"善意"的判断标准模糊、上架等待期的设置缺位等问题。但从长期来看,《中美经贸协议》"通知—删除"规则的内化过程有助于促进该规则的有效运行,推动中国知识产权法制变革,由此,建议应进一步细化有效、合格通知的条件,引入"恶意"错误通知和反通知的惩罚性赔偿制度,明晰"善意"的判断标准,并对"声明未侵权即恢复上架"的规则进行调整。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • China-US Economic and Trade Agreement puts forward new requirements for network copyright protection,including highlighting the efficiency of handling infringement notices,imposing compensation obligations on"malicious"notification and counter notice,adjusting the attribution principle of wrong notification and setting the waiting period of recovery to20 working days. The"notice-takedown"rule of China-US Economic and Trade Agreement is very similar to the copyright legislation of the United States. The"notice-takedown"rule of China-US Economic and Trade Agreement exerts certain pressure on the improvement of China's domestic law,the transformation and implementation of the Agreement is faced with such problems as the standard of qualified notice is too general,the punishment measures for"malicious"submission of notice and counter notice is not clear,the judgment standard of"good faith"of the obligee is vague and the setting of waiting period for recovery is missing. However,in the long run,the internalization process of the "notice-takedown"rule of China-US Economic and Trade Agreement will help to promote the effective operation of the rule and promote the reform of China's intellectual property law. Thus,it is recommended that the conditions of effective and qualified notice should be refined,the punitive compensation system of"malicious"error notice and counter notice should be introduced,the judgment standard of "good faith"should be clarified and the rule of"declaration that no infringement will be restored"should be adjusted.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 201818SFB3050
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 2018年度司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目青年课题“总体国家安全观视角下贸易限制措施实施的法律问题研究”(18SFB3050)
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 21-1584/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 2096-028X
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.942
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D922.16;D922.294;D923
回到顶部