党内法规评估理论供给与实践需求的分野及其应对

Evaluation of the Distinction Between Theoretical Supply and Practical Demand of Inner-Party Regulations and Its Countermeasures

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

廖秀健

归属院系：

政治与公共管理学院

作者：

廖秀健1,2 ;雷浩伟

摘要：

党内法规评估作为党内法规治理机制的核心内容,既是发现立规不足、矫正执规偏差、提升施规实效的实践重点,也是理论界学术争鸣的关注焦点。通过对比分析中央与地方党内法规评估制度内容和重庆市两次党内法规评估工作,发现其实践需求与理论供给之间存在学理之"体"和实然之"用"错位的情况,主要表现为"多元参与"和"责任相关"的主体构成差异、"条文要素"和"时空条件"对象选择差异、"宏观全面"和"举要删芜"的指标设计差异、"单向落实"和"统筹兼顾"的成果运用差异。对此,应积极构建以需求为导向的党内法规评估的理论回归逻辑和实践应对策略:一是回归制度,以责任导向系统界分评估主体;二是回归价值,以问题导向全面覆盖评估对象;三是回归现场,以目标导向精准衡量评估指标;四是回归治理,以效能导向多重落实评估成果。

出版日期：

2021-07-20

学科：

政治学; 马克思主义理论

提交日期：

2021-09-09

引用参考：

廖秀健;雷浩伟. 党内法规评估理论供给与实践需求的分野及其应对[J]. 廉政文化研究,2021(04):40-49+2.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 党内法规评估理论供给与实践需求的分野及其应对
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 廖秀健;雷浩伟
  • dc.contributor.author
  • LIAO Xiujian;LEI Haowei;Chongqing Research Center for Inner-Party Regulations;School of Politics and Public Administration, Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 重庆市党内法规研究中心;西南政法大学政治与公共管理学院
  • dc.publisher
  • 廉政文化研究
  • dc.publisher
  • Anti-corruption and Integrity Culture Studies
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2021
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 04
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.12;No.66
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 40-49+2
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2021-07-20
  • dc.subject
  • 党内法规评估;理论供给;实践需求;评估主体;评估对象;评估指标
  • dc.subject
  • inner-Party regulation evaluation;theoretical supply;practical demands;evaluation subjects;evaluation objects;evaluation standards
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 党内法规评估作为党内法规治理机制的核心内容,既是发现立规不足、矫正执规偏差、提升施规实效的实践重点,也是理论界学术争鸣的关注焦点。通过对比分析中央与地方党内法规评估制度内容和重庆市两次党内法规评估工作,发现其实践需求与理论供给之间存在学理之"体"和实然之"用"错位的情况,主要表现为"多元参与"和"责任相关"的主体构成差异、"条文要素"和"时空条件"对象选择差异、"宏观全面"和"举要删芜"的指标设计差异、"单向落实"和"统筹兼顾"的成果运用差异。对此,应积极构建以需求为导向的党内法规评估的理论回归逻辑和实践应对策略:一是回归制度,以责任导向系统界分评估主体;二是回归价值,以问题导向全面覆盖评估对象;三是回归现场,以目标导向精准衡量评估指标;四是回归治理,以效能导向多重落实评估成果。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • As the core content of the governance mechanism of the inner-Party regulations, the evaluation of such regulations is not only the practical focus of finding legislation defects, correcting the deviation in implementation and improving its effectiveness, but also the focus of academic debates. The analysis of the content of the"central—local"inner-Party regulation evaluation system and the summary of the two inner-Party regulation evaluation work in Chongqing yields the discovery of the disparity between academic basis and practical application, which is demonstrated in the disparity between plural participation and the responsible subjects, between textual factors and temporal-spatial conditions, between macro-comprehensiveness and indicator conciseness, and between one-way implementation and overall wholeness. This considered, a "return logic"and practical strategy are urgently needed for inner-Party regulation evaluation based on demands as follows: First, the return to the system for the evaluation subjects to be defined directed by responsibility; Second, the return to the value for the evaluation objects to be completely covered directed by actual issues; Third, the return to the scene for the evaluation standards to be precisely judged directed by targets; Fourth, the return to treatment for the evaluation of the outcome in a multiple manner directed by effectiveness.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 2018CLS2018ZDWT39;2019CLS2019A02;20202020YBFX48;20212021-GMD-017
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 中国法学会2018年度部级法学研究重点项目（CLS(2018)ZDWT39）;中国法学会2019年度部级法学研究重大项目（CLS(2019)A02）;重庆市社会科学规划2020年度一般项目（2020YBFX48）;国家民委2021年度民族研究自筹项目（2021-GMD-017）
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 32-1817/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1674-9170
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.146
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D262.6
回到顶部