商标法上废弃请求权的正当性基础及其界限

The Legitimacy Foundation and Boundary of Trademark Disposal Claim

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

张耕

归属院系：

民商法学院（知识产权学院）

作者：

张耕1 ;汤贞友

摘要：

过去商标侵权物品处置主要以行政处罚等公权力手段为主,不能满足私权救济的需要。现行《中华人民共和国商标法》(以下简称《商标法》)第63条确立了废弃请求权规范,有助于弥补公权力手段处置商标侵权物品的不足,完善"原权-救济权"的权利链条,降低社会治理的成本。在平等主体的私法领域内,权利人请求处置商标侵权物品,与他人对载体享有的物权产生了冲突。从权利起源看,物权与知识产权都是人为设计的产物并无法理位阶的先后,两者冲突由法律规范重复评价所起,何者优先要基于立法目的的考量。商标废弃请求权限制物权是经济新常态下以创新驱动发展和公共利益的内在要求。商标废弃请求权受到《中华人民共和国民法典》(以下简称《民法典》)绿色原则的调整与限制,比例原则应贯穿侵权物品处置的始终,并在司法中确立该请求权的合理界限。

出版日期：

2021-08-12

学科：

法学

收录：

CSSCI-E

提交日期：

2021-08-26

引用参考：

张耕;汤贞友. 商标法上废弃请求权的正当性基础及其界限[J]. 科技与法律(中英文),2021(04):90-98.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 商标法上废弃请求权的正当性基础及其界限
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 张耕;汤贞友
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Zhang Geng;Tang Zhenyou;Civil and Commercial Law School, Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学民商法学院
  • dc.publisher
  • 科技与法律(中英文)
  • dc.publisher
  • Science Technology and Law(Chinese-English Version)
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2021
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 04
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • No.4
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 90-98
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2021-08-12
  • dc.subject
  • 商标侵权物品;废弃请求权;行政处罚;物权;绿色原则;比例原则
  • dc.subject
  • trademark infringing articles;disposal claim;administrative penalty;real right;green principle;principle of proportionality
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 过去商标侵权物品处置主要以行政处罚等公权力手段为主,不能满足私权救济的需要。现行《中华人民共和国商标法》(以下简称《商标法》)第63条确立了废弃请求权规范,有助于弥补公权力手段处置商标侵权物品的不足,完善"原权-救济权"的权利链条,降低社会治理的成本。在平等主体的私法领域内,权利人请求处置商标侵权物品,与他人对载体享有的物权产生了冲突。从权利起源看,物权与知识产权都是人为设计的产物并无法理位阶的先后,两者冲突由法律规范重复评价所起,何者优先要基于立法目的的考量。商标废弃请求权限制物权是经济新常态下以创新驱动发展和公共利益的内在要求。商标废弃请求权受到《中华人民共和国民法典》(以下简称《民法典》)绿色原则的调整与限制,比例原则应贯穿侵权物品处置的始终,并在司法中确立该请求权的合理界限。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • In the past, the disposal of trademark infringing articles was mainly by means of public power such as administrative penalties, which could not meet the needs of private right relief. Article 63 of the 4 th revised Trademark Law adds trademark disposal claim, which makes up for the deficiency of administrative protection, improves right protection mechanism and reduces the cost of social governance. In the field of private law of equal subject, the request of the right holder to dispose the trademark infringing articles conflicts with the real right of others to the carrier. From the perspective of the origin of rights, both the real right and the intellectual property right are the product of artificial design, and there is no way to determine the order of rank. The conflict between the two is caused by the repeated evaluation of legal norms, and the priority should be considered based on the legislative purpose. The priority of the trademark disposal claim over real right is the inherent requirement of innovation-driven development and public interest under the new normal of economy. The trademark disposal claim is limited by the green principle of Civil Code. The principle of proportionality should run through the disposal of infringing articles, and establish the reasonable boundary of the right to claim in the judicial system.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 17ZDA138;20IP002
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 国家社会科学基金重大项目“创新驱动发展战略下知识产权公共领域问题研究”（17ZDA138）阶段性成果;重庆知识产权保护协同创新中心项目“商标废弃请求权研究”（20IP002）
  • dc.description.sponsorshipsource
  • 国家社会科学基金
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 10-1731/N
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 2096-9783
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.757
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D923.43
回到顶部