环评告知承诺制的制度检视与法治约束

System Inspection and Legal Restriction of the Notification and Commitment System of Environmental Impact Assessment

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

杜健勋

归属院系：

经济法学院（生态法学院）

作者：

杜健勋1 ;廖彩舜

摘要：

环境影响评价是现代环境法从危害控制迈向风险预防的关键制度,应当发挥其应有的规制功能与制度刚性。当前以项目单位自我承诺代替审批机关实质性审批、由事中事后监管代替事前规制为主要内容的环评告知承诺制改革虚化隐匿了环评制度的预先规制功能,突破了现行环评法律体系的边界与范围。据此,须对环评告知承诺制的制度内容进行现实检视,重述环境影响评价制度预防规制的功能定位,并且结合比例原则与法制统一原则等基础性调控逻辑细致考量改革的法治边界,申明环评改革须严格按照法治方式开展。只有坚持依法改革思维和规范法学路径,环评改革方能行稳致远,实现预期改革目的。

出版日期：

2021-05-15

学科：

环境科学; 中外政治制度; 环境与资源保护法学

收录：

北大核心期刊

提交日期：

2021-06-29

引用参考：

杜健勋;廖彩舜. 环评告知承诺制的制度检视与法治约束[J]. 天津行政学院学报,2021(03):85-95.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 环评告知承诺制的制度检视与法治约束
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 杜健勋;廖彩舜
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Du Jianxun;Liao Caishun;Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.publisher
  • 天津行政学院学报
  • dc.publisher
  • Journal of Tianjin Administration Institute
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2021
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 03
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.23;No.209
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 85-95
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2021-05-15
  • dc.subject
  • 环境影响评价;告知承诺制;行政审批改革;风险防控;环境治理
  • dc.subject
  • environmental impact assessment;notification and commitment system;reform of adminsitrative examination and approval;risk prevention;environmental governance
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 环境影响评价是现代环境法从危害控制迈向风险预防的关键制度,应当发挥其应有的规制功能与制度刚性。当前以项目单位自我承诺代替审批机关实质性审批、由事中事后监管代替事前规制为主要内容的环评告知承诺制改革虚化隐匿了环评制度的预先规制功能,突破了现行环评法律体系的边界与范围。据此,须对环评告知承诺制的制度内容进行现实检视,重述环境影响评价制度预防规制的功能定位,并且结合比例原则与法制统一原则等基础性调控逻辑细致考量改革的法治边界,申明环评改革须严格按照法治方式开展。只有坚持依法改革思维和规范法学路径,环评改革方能行稳致远,实现预期改革目的。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The environmental impact assessment system is a key system for modern environmental law to move from hazard prevention to risk prevention, and it should give play to its due regulatory functions and institutional rigidity. The current EIA notification commitment system reform, which focuses on the project unit's self-commitment instead of substantive approval by the examination and approval authority, and ex-post supervision instead of pre-regulation, hides the pre-regulation function of the EIA system and breaks through the boundaries and scope of the current EIA legal system. Based on this, it is necessary to conduct a realistic inspection of the system content of the EIA notification and commitment system, demonstrate and restate the functional positioning of the environmental impact assessment system's preventive regulations, and combine the principle of proportionality and the principle of unification of the legal system to carefully consider the legal boundaries of the reform, and affirm the environmental impact assessment reform must be carried out strictly in accordance with the rule of law. Only by insisting on reforming thinking in accordance with the law and standardizing the path of law, can the environmental impact assessment reform be stable and far-reaching and achieve the expected reform goals.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 2018PY94;2020XZYB-02
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 重庆市社会科学规划项目“环境宪法续造与环境法典规范结构研究”(2018PY94);西南政法大学校级党的十九届四中全会精神理论阐释专项课题“基于环境宪法解释的环境法律续造研究”(2020XZYB-02)
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 12-1284/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1008-7168
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.752
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • X820.3;D630;D922.68
回到顶部