民法典时代公司法定代表人受托责任建构

Construction of Legal Representative’s Fiduciary Duties of Chinese Corporation in Civil-Code Era

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

赵万一

归属院系：

民商法学院（知识产权学院）

作者：

赵万一1 ;王鹏

摘要：

我国《民法典》基于法定代表人对公司之"概括代表"和"同一人格"的定位,在责任承担上采取了由公司对外清偿后,再对内进行事后追偿的双重机制。但由于公司法定代表人利益与公司利益兼具同质性和异质性,导致"同一人格"的认定缺乏法理和事实基础,因此这一双重责任追究机制的合理性值得商榷和反思。从控制公司代理成本和平衡公司利益冲突的角度考量,可以在公司制度设计中树立法定代表人与公司人格区分的理念,通过引入信托责任制度及对公司法定代表人受托责任约束机制的建构,合理分配公司与法定代表人间的责任承担。在《公司法》的修改时,应将更多的信托理念融入对法定代表人行为的规制,并通过完善忠实义务、注意义务的行为标准和判断标准的方式予以实现。

出版日期：

2021-03-15

学科：

经济法学; 民商法学

收录：

北大核心期刊; CSSCI; 中国科技核心期刊

提交日期：

2021-03-31

引用参考：

赵万一;王鹏. 民法典时代公司法定代表人受托责任建构[J]. 思想战线,2021(02):157-163.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 民法典时代公司法定代表人受托责任建构
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 赵万一;王鹏
  • dc.contributor.author
  • ZHAO Wanyi;WANG Peng
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学民商法学院
  • dc.publisher
  • 思想战线
  • dc.publisher
  • Thinking
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2021
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 02
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.47;No.284
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 157-163
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2021-03-15
  • dc.subject
  • 《中华人民共和国民法典》;《中华人民共和国公司法》;法定代表人;信义义务;受托责任
  • dc.subject
  • Civil-Code;Corporation Law;Legal Representative;Fiduciary Duty;Responsibility of Trustee
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 我国《民法典》基于法定代表人对公司之"概括代表"和"同一人格"的定位,在责任承担上采取了由公司对外清偿后,再对内进行事后追偿的双重机制。但由于公司法定代表人利益与公司利益兼具同质性和异质性,导致"同一人格"的认定缺乏法理和事实基础,因此这一双重责任追究机制的合理性值得商榷和反思。从控制公司代理成本和平衡公司利益冲突的角度考量,可以在公司制度设计中树立法定代表人与公司人格区分的理念,通过引入信托责任制度及对公司法定代表人受托责任约束机制的建构,合理分配公司与法定代表人间的责任承担。在《公司法》的修改时,应将更多的信托理念融入对法定代表人行为的规制,并通过完善忠实义务、注意义务的行为标准和判断标准的方式予以实现。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • According to Chinese Civil-Code, responsibility assumption in the context of corporation is rooted in the conception of the legal representative being the general or statutory representative of the legal person and, based on the pre-assumption that the legal representative and the corporation assume the identical legal personality, according to which the corporation shall be held responsible for the out-siders and be endowed with the right of ex-post remedy against the wrong-doing legal representative.The conception of identical personality and therefore the mechanism of responsibility assumption are however, doctrinally and empirically questionable owing to dual nature of homogeneity and heterogeneity with respect to the interests of the corporation and legal representative.For the purpose of mitigating the conflicts between agency costs and protecting corporate's interests, it's desirable, in the course of modifing corporate law, to introduce into corporate regime, the concept of differentiating personalities of legal representative and that of corporate itself.and to design legal representative's fiduciary duties by way of trust-law's responsibility regime, so as to allocate responsibilities between corporation and legal representative reasonably.In the course of modifying Corporation Law, it's desirable to transplant even more trust-law's conceptions into corporation law for the goal of regulating behaviors of legal representatives, perfecting behavior standards and judging criteria in relation to the duties of loyalty and care.
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 53-1002/C
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1001-778X
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.967
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D922.291.91;D923
回到顶部