论涉外仲裁裁决的法外撤裁

A Study on the Setting Aside of Foreign-related Arbitral Awards Beyond the Legal Basis

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

张春良

归属院系：

国际法学院

作者：

张春良1 ;官隆清

摘要：

仲裁裁决撤销机制是司法审查仲裁最严厉的制度安排,撤裁依据的设置是其核心,理应得到严格合理的考量。规范涉外仲裁裁决撤裁依据的是《民事诉讼法》第274条。该条采取了"法定+封闭+程序为主"的"穷尽式清单"模式例举了五类撤裁依据。但司法实践中出现了在法定撤裁依据之外援引审查依据,对仲裁裁决进行直接或间接否定的情形。部分法外撤裁一方面表现为逾矩的违法性,另一方面也显现出了存在的合理性。在仲裁公信力亟待提升、仲裁意思自治寻求深化的新形势下,敏锐回应实践需求、转化实践智慧以改善涉外仲裁裁决撤裁依据的设置,是借力我国《仲裁法》修订契机的顺势而为之举。我国立法可建立由正当程序的法定依据、当事人合意的约定依据、社会公共利益的底线依据三者组成的撤裁依据清单,据此可中和封闭性与开放性、法定性与约定性、实体性与程序性的多重取向,兼容公益、法益和私益的多元诉求。

出版日期：

2021-01-15

学科：

诉讼法学

提交日期：

2021-03-24

引用参考：

张春良;官隆清. 论涉外仲裁裁决的法外撤裁[J]. 国际法研究,2021(01):113-128.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 论涉外仲裁裁决的法外撤裁
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 张春良;官隆清
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Zhang Chunliang;Guan Longqing
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.publisher
  • 国际法研究
  • dc.publisher
  • Chinese Review of International Law
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2021
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 01
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • No.41
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 113-128
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2021-01-15
  • dc.subject
  • 涉外仲裁;仲裁裁决;撤裁依据;意思自治;正当程序;公共利益
  • dc.subject
  • Foreign-related Arbitration;Arbitral Awards;Grounds for Setting Aside of Arbitral Awards;Party Autonomy;Due Process;Public Interest
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 仲裁裁决撤销机制是司法审查仲裁最严厉的制度安排,撤裁依据的设置是其核心,理应得到严格合理的考量。规范涉外仲裁裁决撤裁依据的是《民事诉讼法》第274条。该条采取了"法定+封闭+程序为主"的"穷尽式清单"模式例举了五类撤裁依据。但司法实践中出现了在法定撤裁依据之外援引审查依据,对仲裁裁决进行直接或间接否定的情形。部分法外撤裁一方面表现为逾矩的违法性,另一方面也显现出了存在的合理性。在仲裁公信力亟待提升、仲裁意思自治寻求深化的新形势下,敏锐回应实践需求、转化实践智慧以改善涉外仲裁裁决撤裁依据的设置,是借力我国《仲裁法》修订契机的顺势而为之举。我国立法可建立由正当程序的法定依据、当事人合意的约定依据、社会公共利益的底线依据三者组成的撤裁依据清单,据此可中和封闭性与开放性、法定性与约定性、实体性与程序性的多重取向,兼容公益、法益和私益的多元诉求。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The setting aside mechanism of arbitral awards is the most stringent arrangement for judicial review of arbitration. The grounds for setting aside of arbitral awards which is the core of the setting aside mechanism, deserves a strict and reasonable consideration. The setting aside system of foreign-related arbitration awards is established in the Article 274 of Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China(2017), which adopts a statutory, closed, procedure-based "Exhaustive List" model and stipulates five grounds for setting aside of arbitral awards. However, in judicial practice, there are situations in which the courts set aside the arbitral awards beyond the legal grounds. The opinions of some cases violate the legal provisions, but they are embodied with reasonability. Responding keenly to practical needs and transforming practical wisdom in order to improve setting aside mechanism of foreign-related arbitral awards, is an opportune move to take advantage of the momentum of Arbitration Law of the People's Republic of China revision, under the new situation that the credibility of arbitration needs to be improved urgently and the autonomy of arbitration will seek to be deepened. The list of the legal basis for setting aside arbitral award should be established, combing due process, party autonomy with public interest, to balance closeness and openness, legality and autonomy, substantive and procedural, and to harmonize multi-values of public, legal and private interests.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 201818SFB1009;202020200107
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 2018年度国家法治与法学理论研究重点项目《论海牙“判决项目”的最新发展——中国视角、立场与方案》(18SFB1009);2020年度内陆开放法律研究中心课题《涉外商事案件管辖改革研究》(20200107)资助
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 10-1216/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 2095-7610
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 1.126
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D925.7;D925.1
回到顶部