刑事强制医疗审批的证据问题研究——以强制医疗申请被驳回案件为视角

Study of evidence in criminal compulsory medical examination and approval.——from a perspective of rejected cases

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

向静

归属院系:

刑事侦查学院

作者:

向静1,2 ;刘于禾

摘要:

强制医疗程序是我国刑事诉讼中针对精神障碍者触犯刑法而无刑事责任能力时采取的一种特别程序。具体实施过程中,法官对案件相关证据审查后可能驳回强制医疗申请,致精神障碍者重回社区。本文调查中国裁判文书网上强制医疗申请被驳回的65起案例,结合本地司法部门访谈及实务案件调研,针对强制医疗申请被驳回,揭示了现状,分析了原因,并就完善刑事强制医疗审批程序提出了应对措施,以期提升侦查取证与证据审查的科学性与合理性,在保障精神障碍者人权的基础上,降低精神障碍者再次实施危害行为的可能性。

出版日期:

2020-12-25

学科:

诉讼法学

收录:

中国科技核心期刊

提交日期:

2021-01-21

引用参考:

向静;刘于禾. 刑事强制医疗审批的证据问题研究——以强制医疗申请被驳回案件为视角[J]. 证据科学,2020(06):704-717.

全文附件授权许可:

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 刑事强制医疗审批的证据问题研究——以强制医疗申请被驳回案件为视角
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 向静;刘于禾
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Xiang Jing;Liu Yuhe;College of criminal investigation, Southwest University of political science and law;Research Center for psychology and intelligent control of special population
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学刑事侦查学院;西南政法大学特殊人群心理与智能管理服务研究中心
  • dc.publisher
  • 证据科学
  • dc.publisher
  • Evidence Science
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2020
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 06
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.28
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 704-717
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2020-12-25
  • dc.subject
  • 刑事案件;强制医疗;审批;证据
  • dc.subject
  • Criminal case;Compulsory medical treatment;Approve;Evidence
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 强制医疗程序是我国刑事诉讼中针对精神障碍者触犯刑法而无刑事责任能力时采取的一种特别程序。具体实施过程中,法官对案件相关证据审查后可能驳回强制医疗申请,致精神障碍者重回社区。本文调查中国裁判文书网上强制医疗申请被驳回的65起案例,结合本地司法部门访谈及实务案件调研,针对强制医疗申请被驳回,揭示了现状,分析了原因,并就完善刑事强制医疗审批程序提出了应对措施,以期提升侦查取证与证据审查的科学性与合理性,在保障精神障碍者人权的基础上,降低精神障碍者再次实施危害行为的可能性。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The compulsory medical procedure is a special procedure adopted in criminal proceedings in China when the mentally disabled has violated the criminal law yet without criminal responsibility. In the specific implementation process, the judge may reject the application for compulsory medical treatment after reviewing the relevant evidence of the case, causing the mental patient to return to the community. This article studies 65 cases(from the online database of the Chinese adjudication documents) where the online compulsory medical treatment applications were rejected. In addition, an empirical study based on interviews with local judicial departments and observation of practical case will be carried out. A profile of rejection of compulsory medical treatment applications will be drawn, and its root causes will be analyzed. Countermeasures thereof are designed to improve the scientificity and rationality of the investigation and evidence collection and the review of evidence, and to reduce the possibility of the mental patient's re-performing harmful behaviors on the basis of protecting the human rights of the people with mental disorders.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 19BFX175;2018T110940;2017M610586;XmT2018024
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 国家社会科学基金项目(19BFX175);中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目(2018T110940);中国博士后科学基金一等资助项目(2017M610586);重庆市博士后科研项目特别资助(XmT2018024)
  • dc.description.sponsorshipsource
  • 国家社会科学基金;中国博士后科学基金;中国博士后科学基金
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 11-5643/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1674-1226
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.453
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D925.2
回到顶部