盗窃房屋行为的罪数剖析与构成要素证成

Analysis of the Number of Crimes of Stealing Houses and the Justification of Its Constituent Elements

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

李永升

归属院系:

法学院

作者:

李永升1 ;樊华中

摘要:

盗窃房屋或盗卖房产一般是指由行为人盗取他人房产权利凭证并通过伪造、虚构、隐瞒等方式形成完整的权利外观后,隐瞒事实向第三人贩卖并进而占有房产权利凭证载明的房屋现金价值的行为,在司法实践中通常被认定为诈骗或合同诈骗罪。从行为、结果、被害人、罪过等构成要件要素考察,盗窃房产权利凭证进而隐瞒事实占有房屋现金价值行为符合数个构成要件,属于罪数领域的问题。以罪数理论的核心处理原则即量刑合理化判断,唯有以盗窃罪从一重罪论处方足以保护被侵犯的法益。从盗窃权利凭证维度对盗窃罪犯罪构成重新诠释,盗窃房产权利凭证形成完整权利处观进而隐瞒事实贩卖的,其在行为方式、被害人确定、盗窃后续行为理解等方面应有特殊诠释,此种诠释有《刑法》第193条第3款盗窃权利凭证立法例作为背书,仍应当以盗窃罪论处,而不应认定为诈骗罪或合同诈骗罪。

出版日期:

2020-06-30

学科:

刑法学

收录:

CSSCI

提交日期

2020-10-02

引用参考

李永升;樊华中. 盗窃房屋行为的罪数剖析与构成要素证成[J]. 刑法论丛,2019(03):23-53.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 盗窃房屋行为的罪数剖析与构成要素证成
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 李永升;樊华中
  • dc.contributor.author
  • LI Yongsheng;Fan Huazhong
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学法学院
  • dc.publisher
  • 刑法论丛
  • dc.publisher
  • Criminal Law Review
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2019
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 03
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.59
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 23-53
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2020-06-30
  • dc.subject
  • 盗窃;房屋;权利凭证;合同诈骗
  • dc.subject
  • theft;houses;larcenyvoucher;contract fraud
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 盗窃房屋或盗卖房产一般是指由行为人盗取他人房产权利凭证并通过伪造、虚构、隐瞒等方式形成完整的权利外观后,隐瞒事实向第三人贩卖并进而占有房产权利凭证载明的房屋现金价值的行为,在司法实践中通常被认定为诈骗或合同诈骗罪。从行为、结果、被害人、罪过等构成要件要素考察,盗窃房产权利凭证进而隐瞒事实占有房屋现金价值行为符合数个构成要件,属于罪数领域的问题。以罪数理论的核心处理原则即量刑合理化判断,唯有以盗窃罪从一重罪论处方足以保护被侵犯的法益。从盗窃权利凭证维度对盗窃罪犯罪构成重新诠释,盗窃房产权利凭证形成完整权利处观进而隐瞒事实贩卖的,其在行为方式、被害人确定、盗窃后续行为理解等方面应有特殊诠释,此种诠释有《刑法》第193条第3款盗窃权利凭证立法例作为背书,仍应当以盗窃罪论处,而不应认定为诈骗罪或合同诈骗罪。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Theft of a house or sale of a house generally refers to the act of a person who steals another person's certificate of property rights and forms a complete appearance of the right through forgery,fiction,concealment and other means,then conceals the facts and sells it to a third person and then takes possession of the cash value of the house as stated in the certificate of property rights.In judicial practice,the act is usually regarded as fraud crime or contract fraud crime.From the elements of behavior,result,victim and crime,it is a crime that conforms to several constitutive requirements and belongs to the field of the number of crimes.The core principle of crime number theory is Sentencing Rationalization judgment.Theft from a felony theory is sufficient to protect the legal interests.From the dimension of the theft right voucher,the composition of the crime of larceny is reinterpreted.The theft property should be regarded as the full right view of the theft right voucher and the cash value contained in the proof of the right,which should be interpreted in a special way in the way of behavior,the determination of the victim and the understanding of the subsequent behavior of the theft.The third clause of Article 193 of the Chinese criminal law,which stipulate theft certificate of rights shall be regarded as an endorsement.In view of this perspective,housing larceny shall still be punished for theft.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 201717XFX009
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 2017年度国家社会科学基金项目“刑罚退出机制的价值确立与实践运行研究”(项目编号:17XFX009)成果
  • dc.description.sponsorshipsource
  • 国家社会科学基金
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D924.35
回到顶部