认罪认罚案件抗诉问题实证研究——基于102份裁判文书的分析

An Empirical Study on Issues of Protest in the Case of the Admission of Guilt and Acceptance of Punishment:Based on the Analysis of 102 Adjudication Documents

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

孙长永

归属院系：

法学院

作者：

孙长永1 ;冯科臻

摘要：

对裁判文书实证分析发现,认罪认罚案件中的抗诉包括"针对被告人上诉而提出的抗诉""量刑建议未得到采纳而引发的抗诉"及"基于事实认定和适用法律上的其他错误而提出的抗诉"三种类型。第一类抗诉主要涉及认罪认罚案件中的"认罚"以及《刑事诉讼法》第228条的理解和适用问题。第二类抗诉主要涉及《刑事诉讼法》第201条以及《认罪认罚从宽制度试点工作的办法(试行)》类似规定的理解和适用问题。第三类抗诉是由于强调"从快"而放松事实审查或法律审查的必然结果,其反映了抗诉对程序简化而导致实体不公的补正功效,但是同时也暴露出了"量刑建议明显不当导致量刑明显不当,事后公诉机关能否提起抗诉"等问题。

出版日期：

2020-08-15

学科：

诉讼法学

提交日期：

2020-09-11

引用参考：

孙长永;冯科臻. 认罪认罚案件抗诉问题实证研究——基于102份裁判文书的分析[J]. 西南政法大学学报,2020(04):90-105.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 认罪认罚案件抗诉问题实证研究——基于102份裁判文书的分析
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 孙长永;冯科臻
  • dc.contributor.author
  • SUN Chang-yong;FENG Ke-zhen;Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.publisher
  • 西南政法大学学报
  • dc.publisher
  • Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2020
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 04
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.22;No.130
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 90-105
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2020-08-15
  • dc.subject
  • 抗诉;上诉;量刑建议;从快
  • dc.subject
  • protest;appeal;sentencing recommendation;speediness
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 对裁判文书实证分析发现,认罪认罚案件中的抗诉包括"针对被告人上诉而提出的抗诉""量刑建议未得到采纳而引发的抗诉"及"基于事实认定和适用法律上的其他错误而提出的抗诉"三种类型。第一类抗诉主要涉及认罪认罚案件中的"认罚"以及《刑事诉讼法》第228条的理解和适用问题。第二类抗诉主要涉及《刑事诉讼法》第201条以及《认罪认罚从宽制度试点工作的办法(试行)》类似规定的理解和适用问题。第三类抗诉是由于强调"从快"而放松事实审查或法律审查的必然结果,其反映了抗诉对程序简化而导致实体不公的补正功效,但是同时也暴露出了"量刑建议明显不当导致量刑明显不当,事后公诉机关能否提起抗诉"等问题。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Based on the empirical analysis of adjudication documents,it is found that the protest in the case of the admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment includes three types: "protest against the defendant's appeal","protest caused by the failure to adopt sentencing recommendation"and "protest against other errors in fact-finding and application of law". The first kind of protest mainly involves"the acceptance of punishment"in the case of the admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment and the understanding and application of Article 228 of the Criminal Procedure Law. The second type of protest mainly involves the understanding and application of Article 201 of the Criminal Procedure Law and the similar provisions of the Measures for the Pilot Program of Imposing Lenient Punishments on Those Confessing to Their Crimes and Accepting Punishments( For Trial Implementation). The third type of protest is the inevitable result of relaxing factual or legal review due to the emphasis on " speediness ",which reflects the correction effect of the protest on the substantive injustice caused by the simplification of the procedure,but at the same time,it also exposes such problems as "obviously improper sentencing recommendations lead to obvious improper sentencing,and whether the public prosecution organ can initiate a protest afterwards".
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 19AFX009
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 国家社科基金重点项目“认罪认罚从宽制度实施问题研究”(19AFX009)
  • dc.description.sponsorshipsource
  • 国家社会科学基金
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 50-1024/C
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1008-4355
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.460
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D925.2
回到顶部