论ICSID仲裁临时措施的约束力理据与中国启示

On the Rationale of Binding Force in ICSID Interim Measures of Arbitration and Enlightenment for China

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

张春良

归属院系：

国际法学院

作者：

张春良1 ;周大山

摘要：

《关于解决国家与他国国民间投资争端公约》第47条规定了"建议性"临时措施,该表述触发了临时措施是否具有约束力的争议。实践中国际投资争端解决中心(ICSID)仲裁庭通过命令说和职能说两种观点赋予临时措施约束力,但命令说有违文义解释的基本原则;职能说又立足于似是而非的类比论证。临时措施所保护的权利才是其具有约束力的正当理据。权利与义务的对应揭示了临时措施虽然是仲裁庭之"建议",但基于当事人承担的义务因素而获得约束力。ICSID仲裁临时措施约束力的困境堪为镜鉴,中国应更新现有投资协议中有关投资仲裁临时措施规定过于"谨慎"的模式,并在为"一带一路"倡议供给投资仲裁临时措施规则时增加担保措施和公共政策损害补偿措施的内容,以在保护投资者权利与避免东道国权益受损之间实现中道平衡。此种新的"义利观"是塑造支撑"一带一路"倡议的区域性投资仲裁机制的向心力量。

出版日期：

2020-07-10

学科：

国际法学

收录：

CSSCI

提交日期：

2020-07-31

引用参考：

张春良;周大山. 论ICSID仲裁临时措施的约束力理据与中国启示[J]. 中国政法大学学报,2020(04):55-66+207.

  • dc.title
  • 论ICSID仲裁临时措施的约束力理据与中国启示
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 张春良;周大山
  • dc.contributor.author
  • ZHANG Chunliang;ZHOU Dashan;School of International Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学国际法学院
  • dc.publisher
  • 中国政法大学学报
  • dc.publisher
  • Journal of CUPL
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2020
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 04
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • No.78
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 55-66+207
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2020-07-10
  • dc.subject
  • ICSID仲裁;临时措施;约束力;“一带一路”倡议
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 《关于解决国家与他国国民间投资争端公约》第47条规定了"建议性"临时措施,该表述触发了临时措施是否具有约束力的争议。实践中国际投资争端解决中心(ICSID)仲裁庭通过命令说和职能说两种观点赋予临时措施约束力,但命令说有违文义解释的基本原则;职能说又立足于似是而非的类比论证。临时措施所保护的权利才是其具有约束力的正当理据。权利与义务的对应揭示了临时措施虽然是仲裁庭之"建议",但基于当事人承担的义务因素而获得约束力。ICSID仲裁临时措施约束力的困境堪为镜鉴,中国应更新现有投资协议中有关投资仲裁临时措施规定过于"谨慎"的模式,并在为"一带一路"倡议供给投资仲裁临时措施规则时增加担保措施和公共政策损害补偿措施的内容,以在保护投资者权利与避免东道国权益受损之间实现中道平衡。此种新的"义利观"是塑造支撑"一带一路"倡议的区域性投资仲裁机制的向心力量。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Article 47 of Arbitration Rules in ICSID Convention provides "recommendations" for interim measures. It leads to the dispute on whether the interim measures have binding force. In practice, interim measures are binding in the ICSID arbitration court according to the empowerment theory and the competency theory. However, the empowerment theory is against the basic principle of literal interpretation and the competency theory is based on a vague analogy. It is the right protected by interim measures that gives legitimate grounds for the binding force of interim measures. The correspondence between rights and obligations reveals that although interim measures are "recommendations" of the arbitration tribunal, they are bound by the obligations assumed by the parties. China should take the ICSID's dilemma of the binding force of interim measures in arbitration into consideration and update the "over-prudent" model of interim measures for investment arbitration in the existing investment agreements. We should also add measures of guarantee and damages for the public policy into the interim measures of investment arbitration in the Belt and Road Initiative. These updates can strike the balance between protecting investors' rights and avoiding damages of host country's rights and interests. This new vision can also be the pillar to shape and support the regional investment arbitration mechanism of the Belt and Road Initiative.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 201818SFB1009
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 2018年度国家法治与法学理论研究重点项目——“论海牙‘判决项目’的最新发展——中国视角、立场与方案”(项目编号:18SFB1009)的阶段性研究成果
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 11-5607/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1674-0602
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.884
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D997.4
回到顶部