法律规则逻辑结构理论的变迁及反思

Changes of the Logical Structure Theory of a Legal Rule and Its Reflection

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

赵树坤

归属院系：

行政法学院（纪检监察学院）

作者：

赵树坤1 ;张晗

摘要：

自新中国成立以来,关于法律规则的逻辑结构理论,我国法理学界大致存在四种主张:三要素说、二要素说、新三要素说和新二要素说。这四种学说或是在实践上无法被准确适用,或是在逻辑上无法自洽,抑或在理论上尚未回答根本性问题。事实上,对法律规则逻辑结构理论的证成必须从"道义"合法性、逻辑自洽与指导实践三个维度出发。从这三个维度出发检讨这四种学说,可以发现,由二要素说所做的从"阶级斗争论"到"权利本位论"的工作尚未完成;由新三要素说所呈现的从"本体论"到"方法论"的努力仍需持续;而新二要素说所揭示的从"中国式回答"到"多元化视角"的进路亦无法回避中国自身的"元问题"。

出版日期：

2020-01-10

学科：

法学理论

收录：

CSSCI; 中国科技核心期刊

提交日期：

2020-04-16

引用参考：

赵树坤;张晗. 法律规则逻辑结构理论的变迁及反思[J]. 法制与社会发展,2020(01):62-80.

  • dc.title
  • 法律规则逻辑结构理论的变迁及反思
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 赵树坤;张晗
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Zhao Shukun;Zhang Han
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.publisher
  • 法制与社会发展
  • dc.publisher
  • Law and Social Development
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2020
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 01
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.26;No.151
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 62-80
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2020-01-10
  • dc.subject
  • 法律规则;结构;道义;实践;逻辑
  • dc.subject
  • Legal Rule;Structure;Morality;Practice;Logic
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 自新中国成立以来,关于法律规则的逻辑结构理论,我国法理学界大致存在四种主张:三要素说、二要素说、新三要素说和新二要素说。这四种学说或是在实践上无法被准确适用,或是在逻辑上无法自洽,抑或在理论上尚未回答根本性问题。事实上,对法律规则逻辑结构理论的证成必须从"道义"合法性、逻辑自洽与指导实践三个维度出发。从这三个维度出发检讨这四种学说,可以发现,由二要素说所做的从"阶级斗争论"到"权利本位论"的工作尚未完成;由新三要素说所呈现的从"本体论"到"方法论"的努力仍需持续;而新二要素说所揭示的从"中国式回答"到"多元化视角"的进路亦无法回避中国自身的"元问题"。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Since the founding of the People's Republic of China, there are roughly four doctrines on the logical structure theory of a legal rule in Chinese jurisprudence: the three-elements doctrine, the two-elements doctrine, the new three-elements doctrine, and the new two-elements doctrine, which are accompanied by constant debate and criticism. The four doctrines are either not accurately applicable in practice, logically unable to be self-consistent, or have not yet answered fundamental questions in theory. In fact, the justification of the logical structure of a legal rule must start from the three dimensions of"moral"legitimacy, logical self-consistency, and guiding practice. In this way, the work from"Class Struggle"to"Theory of Right-oriented"done by the two-elements doctrine has not been completed; the effort from"Ontology"to"Methodology"presented by the new three-elements doctrine still needs to be continued; the approach from the"Chinese-style Answer"to the"Multiple Perspective"revealed by the two-elements doctrine also cannot evade China's own"meta-question".
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 22-1243/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1006-6128
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 2.447
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D920.0
回到顶部