比较法视野下认罪认罚案件被告人的上诉权

The Appeal Right of the Accused Who Admitted Guilt and Accepted Punishment Proposal: A Comparative Perspective

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

孙长永

归属院系：

法学院

作者：

孙长永

摘要：

英美法对认罪的被告人就定罪问题的上诉权进行了极其严格的限制,但对其不服量刑的上诉权仍然给予保障;大陆法系的意大利、德国以及我国台湾地区也分别通过立法或者实践对认罪协商案件中的上诉权进行了限制。我国认罪认罚从宽制度的运行条件与域外不同,现阶段不宜对认罪认罚案件的上诉权进行限制。但从发展方向看,对认罪认罚被告人的上诉权进行一定的限制,乃是完善刑事诉讼中认罪认罚从宽制度的内在要求,也符合以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革的趋势和刑事司法规律。在立法模式上,可以借鉴域外立法经验,对允许上诉的理由进行列举性规定;在立法修改以前,司法机关可以开展通过协议限制被告人上诉权的试点工作,但应提供必要的程序保障。

语种：

中文

出版日期：

2019-05-25

学科：

诉讼法学

收录：

CSSCI

提交日期：

2019-06-12

引用参考：

孙长永. 比较法视野下认罪认罚案件被告人的上诉权[J]. 比较法研究,2019(03):37-52.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 比较法视野下认罪认罚案件被告人的上诉权
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 孙长永
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Sun Changyong
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学诉讼法与司法改革研究中心;
  • dc.publisher
  • 比较法研究
  • dc.publisher
  • Journal of Comparative Law
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2019
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 03
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • No.163
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 37-52
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2019-05-25
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 认罪认罚;上诉权;合理限制
  • dc.subject
  • admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment proposal;appeal right;reasonable restriction
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 英美法对认罪的被告人就定罪问题的上诉权进行了极其严格的限制,但对其不服量刑的上诉权仍然给予保障;大陆法系的意大利、德国以及我国台湾地区也分别通过立法或者实践对认罪协商案件中的上诉权进行了限制。我国认罪认罚从宽制度的运行条件与域外不同,现阶段不宜对认罪认罚案件的上诉权进行限制。但从发展方向看,对认罪认罚被告人的上诉权进行一定的限制,乃是完善刑事诉讼中认罪认罚从宽制度的内在要求,也符合以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革的趋势和刑事司法规律。在立法模式上,可以借鉴域外立法经验,对允许上诉的理由进行列举性规定;在立法修改以前,司法机关可以开展通过协议限制被告人上诉权的试点工作,但应提供必要的程序保障。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • According to law in England & Wells as well as the United States,the right to appeal against the conviction of the accused who has pled guilty is severely restricted while his right to appeal against the sentence is fully protected. In countries or areas with a civil law tradition such as Italy,Germany or China' s Taiwan,the accused's right of appeal against negotiated judgments is also restricted in law orpractice. Although it is not feasible to curtail the appeal right of the accused who admitted guilt and punishment proposal at present in China due to different judicial conditions,such a kind of restriction is not only called for inherently by the improvement of the system of leniency based on admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment proposal,but also necessitated by the trend to establish a trial-centered criminal procedural system and general rule of law in the process of criminal cases. As to the legal mode,It is suggested that permissible reasons of appeal should be exhaustively enumerated in law. Before the proposed legislative revision is materialized,the prosecuting authority may try to negotiate with the accused to forgive his right of appeal if he admits his guilt and accept the prosecution's proposal of punishment voluntarily with the assistance of a lawyer,subject to necessary procedural guarantees.
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 中宣部“全国文化名家暨‘四个一批’人才”项目经费资助
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 11-3171/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1004-8561
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 1.756
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D925.2
回到顶部