WTO改革的中国学者方案 笔谈

WTO Reform Proposals from Chinese Schloars

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

陈咏梅 ; 全小莲

归属院系：

国际法学院

作者：

朱绵茂 ;陈卫东 ; 陈咏梅 ;崔凡 ;丁如 ;韩立余 ;贺小勇 ;黄志瑾 ;李居迁 ;李晓玲 ;刘敬东 ;蒲凌尘 ;漆彤 ; 全小莲 ;屠新泉 ;肖冰 ;杨国华 ;张乃根 ;王江雨

摘要：

当前WTO面临危机,欧盟和加拿大等WTO成员已经提出比较全面的改革方案,中国政府也提出了WTO改革的主要原则。此外,欧洲大学Hoekman教授也邀请了一些研究者提出了学者方案。中国法学会WTO法研究会是WTO法研究的专业组织,汇聚了国内WTO法律研究的主要学者,在此时此刻理应发声,为WTO改革献计献策。为此,2018年11月WTO研究会邀请部分专家就WTO改革问题分别提出方案,并且专门组织研讨会交流观点。

语种：

中文

出版日期：

2019-02-15

学科：

国际法学

提交日期：

2019-05-22

引用参考：

朱绵茂;陈卫东;陈咏梅;崔凡;丁如;韩立余;贺小勇;黄志瑾;李居迁;李晓玲;刘敬东;蒲凌尘;漆彤;全小莲;屠新泉;肖冰;杨国华;张乃根;王江雨. WTO改革的中国学者方案 笔谈[J]. 南海法学,2019(01):1-16.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • WTO改革的中国学者方案 笔谈
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 朱绵茂;陈卫东;陈咏梅;崔凡;丁如;韩立余;贺小勇;黄志瑾;李居迁;李晓玲;刘敬东;蒲凌尘;漆彤;全小莲;屠新泉;肖冰;杨国华;张乃根;王江雨
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Zhu Mianmao
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 海南政法职业学院;海南省法学会国际经济贸易法研究会;对外经济贸易大学法学院;西南政法大学国际法学院;对外经济贸易大学国际经贸学院;中国政法大学国际法学院;中国人民大学法学院;中国法学会WTO法研究会;华东政法大学国际法学院;上海对外经贸大学;中国社科院大学;中国社科院国际法所;中伦律师事务所;武汉大学国际法研究所;对外经济贸易大学中国WTO研究院;东南大学法学院;清华大学法学院;复旦大学法学院;新加坡国立大学法学院;
  • dc.publisher
  • 南海法学
  • dc.publisher
  • The South China Sea Law Journal
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2019
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 01
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.3;No.13
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 1-16
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2019-02-15
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 当前WTO面临危机,欧盟和加拿大等WTO成员已经提出比较全面的改革方案,中国政府也提出了WTO改革的主要原则。此外,欧洲大学Hoekman教授也邀请了一些研究者提出了学者方案。中国法学会WTO法研究会是WTO法研究的专业组织,汇聚了国内WTO法律研究的主要学者,在此时此刻理应发声,为WTO改革献计献策。为此,2018年11月WTO研究会邀请部分专家就WTO改革问题分别提出方案,并且专门组织研讨会交流观点。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Over a hundred WTO scholars, mostly law school professors and research fellows, are discussing the topic of WTO reform in the era of WTO crisis together with their counterparts all around the world and in late 2018, over a dozen of them provided drafts to the China WTO Law Society which was established in 2001 when China joined the WTO and nowadays is one of the most representative WTO research societies in China. These drafts which are abstracted in the following reflect part of the ideas on WTO reform from the Chinese adademia.Most drafts trace the origin of the WTO crisis to the consensus rule-making system, but some point out the blocking of Apellate Body normination is the real reason. While some drafts put forward the general principles of reform, such as China as a developing country, some others emphasis the importance of China' s economic reform and opening-up. In the specific area, some drafts touch upon the area of state-owned enterprises and some others mention the amendments to apellate system.Solutions to the crisis are the most difficult and fascinating part of the drafts. Some expect a more active role of China in the process, others point out particular areas(eg. digital trade) that China could lead in the reform. Some put forward prosals on the strategy on negotiation( eg.colabrating with the EU), others warn the coming multilaterial rules based on CPTPP/USMCA and advise China get involved.Obviously, unlike those of their counterparts in the EU and US, these drafts are not only about WTO reform, but also on China reform, which means the two reforms are closely connected in the sense that they will be mutual beneficial. Frankly speaking, the ideas from these drafts are not necessarily new, since most of them reflect the experience of economic development in China since its entry into the WTO in 2001, or even the experice of 40 years since China began to open up at the end of 1970's. What is new is that these drafts recognize the critical importance of WTO to China and vice versa which will prove to be of both theoretical and practical value in the future.
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 46-1086/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 2096-4013
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D996.1
回到顶部