论我国承认与执行外国法院判决制度

On the recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgment system in China

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属院系:

法学院

作者:

王冰洁

导师:

肖晖

导师单位:

法学院

学位:

硕士

语种:

其他

关键词:

承认与执行外国法院判决;审查条件;互惠关系;《选择法院协议公约》

摘要:

在诉讼程序中,判决能得到执行是当事人追求的目标。在涉外领域也是如此,不过在执行前需要得到执行国的承认。由于承认与执行外国法院判决涉及到多个国家之间政治、经济以及司法系统的不同原则和机制,相比较国内判决的执行增加了不少难度。随着经济全球化和“一带一路”的建设,承认与执行外国法院判决是各国都必须要重点关注的方面。因此,本文本着研究我国这一制度的目的出发,将本文分为四个部分:第一部分是有关承认与执行外国法院判决的基本理论。该部分区分并界定了外国法院判决、承认与执行的概念以此确定研究的基本内容和范围。之后又论述了承认与执行外国法院判决的理论依据,包括国际上通行的学说并重点阐述了我国承认与执行外国法院判决的依据,其中对我国缔结的双边司法协定以表格的形式进行了梳理和总结。第二部分是我国承认与执行制度的具体诉讼程序。其中对承认和执行外国判决的审查条件的阐述是重点,除了审查条件外,还包含了提起请求与受理、执行程序以及承认之后的效力等内容。第三部分是提出了我国在这一制度中目前存在的问题。主要包括立法制定中的不足、适用“实质互惠”导致的弊端以及没有参加统一公约这三个方面。立法上的不足主要是缺乏对审判国法院合格管辖权判断的标准以及程序立法上的一些不足之处;阐述了“实质互惠”这一原则不仅阻碍了其他国家的判决在我国的承认与执行,也阻碍了我国法院判决在其他国家的承认与执行;并通过阐述我国加入《纽约公约》对我国承认与执行外国仲裁制度的益处来提出承认与执行外国法院判决在加入统一公约方面的的缺失。第四部分是对第三部分的问题提出了解决办法。其中包括立法的完善,“互惠”观念的改变以及加入《选择法院协议公约》,除了完善立法方面的缺陷外,加入公约是该部分的重点。对公约中的相关制度以及我国加入该公约的重要意义进行了阐述。希望能对我国承认与执行外国法院判决制度的完善起到一些作用。

学科:

诉讼法学

提交日期

2019-04-11

引用参考

王冰洁. 论我国承认与执行外国法院判决制度[D]. 西南政法大学,2018.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 论我国承认与执行外国法院判决制度
  • dc.title
  • On the recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgment system in China
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20150301060473
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 王冰洁
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 法学院
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法学硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2018
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 肖晖
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 法学院
  • dc.language.iso
  • 其他
  • dc.subject
  • 承认与执行外国法院判决;审查条件;互惠关系;《选择法院协议公约》
  • dc.subject
  • recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments ; conditions of examination,;reciprocal relations;"Convention on the choice of court agreement"
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 在诉讼程序中,判决能得到执行是当事人追求的目标。在涉外领域也是如此,不过在执行前需要得到执行国的承认。由于承认与执行外国法院判决涉及到多个国家之间政治、经济以及司法系统的不同原则和机制,相比较国内判决的执行增加了不少难度。随着经济全球化和“一带一路”的建设,承认与执行外国法院判决是各国都必须要重点关注的方面。因此,本文本着研究我国这一制度的目的出发,将本文分为四个部分:第一部分是有关承认与执行外国法院判决的基本理论。该部分区分并界定了外国法院判决、承认与执行的概念以此确定研究的基本内容和范围。之后又论述了承认与执行外国法院判决的理论依据,包括国际上通行的学说并重点阐述了我国承认与执行外国法院判决的依据,其中对我国缔结的双边司法协定以表格的形式进行了梳理和总结。第二部分是我国承认与执行制度的具体诉讼程序。其中对承认和执行外国判决的审查条件的阐述是重点,除了审查条件外,还包含了提起请求与受理、执行程序以及承认之后的效力等内容。第三部分是提出了我国在这一制度中目前存在的问题。主要包括立法制定中的不足、适用“实质互惠”导致的弊端以及没有参加统一公约这三个方面。立法上的不足主要是缺乏对审判国法院合格管辖权判断的标准以及程序立法上的一些不足之处;阐述了“实质互惠”这一原则不仅阻碍了其他国家的判决在我国的承认与执行,也阻碍了我国法院判决在其他国家的承认与执行;并通过阐述我国加入《纽约公约》对我国承认与执行外国仲裁制度的益处来提出承认与执行外国法院判决在加入统一公约方面的的缺失。第四部分是对第三部分的问题提出了解决办法。其中包括立法的完善,“互惠”观念的改变以及加入《选择法院协议公约》,除了完善立法方面的缺陷外,加入公约是该部分的重点。对公约中的相关制度以及我国加入该公约的重要意义进行了阐述。希望能对我国承认与执行外国法院判决制度的完善起到一些作用。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The enforcement of judgments is the final step in the proceedings and the execution of the judgments results in the final resolution of the dispute between the parties. The same is true in the field of foreign affairs, but it needs to be recognized by the State of enforcement before it can be implemented. Since the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments involve different principles and mechanisms of the political, economic and judicial systems among many countries, it has increased the difficulty of recognition and enforcement of domestic judgments. With the building of the economic globalization and the "One Belt and One Road," the increase of contacts between countries and the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments are issues that all countries must focus on. Therefore, based on the purpose of perfecting the system of recognition and enforcement of foreign-related judgments in our country, this essay leads to this article in the introduction part through the current recognition and enforcement of foreign-related judgments in our country. The text is divided into four parts:The first part is the basic theory of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments. This part first defines the concept of foreign judgments, recognition and enforcement in order to determine the basic content and scope of the study. After that, it also discusses the theoretical basis for the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, including the internationally accepted doctrine and the basis for our country's recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments. The bilateral judicial agreements concluded in China are sorted out and summarized in the form of forms.The second part is the specific procedure of our country's recognition and enforcement system. Among them, the elaboration of the conditions for the examination of the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments is the key point. In addition to the examination of the conditions, the conditions for filing the request and acceptance, the enforcement procedures and the effectiveness after the recognition are also included.The third part is the existing problems in our system. It mainly includes three aspects: the inadequacy of legislation, the malpractice caused by the application of "substantial reciprocity" and the non-participation in the uniform convention. The shortcoming in legislation is the lack of criteria for judging the competent jurisdiction of the court of the country of trial and some deficiencies in procedural legislation;This paper expounds that the principle of "substantial reciprocity" not only hinders the recognition and enforcement of judgments of other countries in China, but also hinders the recognition and enforcement of Chinese court judgments in other countries. By expounding the benefits of China's accession to the New York convention to China's recognition and enforcement of the foreign arbitration system, the author puts forward the deficiency of recognition and enforcement of foreign court judgments in acceding to the uniform convention.The fourth part is to propose solutions to the problems in the third part. These include the improvement of legislation, the change of the concept of "reciprocity" and the inclusion of the "Convention on the Choice of Court Agreements", of which the "Convention on the Choice of Court Agreements" is the focus. The relevant systems in the convention, such as the basic principle, the scope of application, the jurisdiction of the agreement and the system of the declaration, as well as the significance of our country's accession to the convention are elaborated. It hopes to play a role in perfecting the system of recognition and enforcement of foreign-related judgments in our country.
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2026-03-06
  • dc.date.oralDefense
  • 2018-12-02
  • dc.relation.relatedpublications
  • 目 录引 言1一、承认与执行外国法院判决的基本理论2(一)承认与执行外国法院判决的概念2(二)承认与执行外国法院判决的理论学说及依据4(三)承认与执行外国法院判决的必要性12二、我国承认与执行外国法院判决的程序规范13(一)我国承认与执行外国法院判决的具体程序13(二)请求的提起与受理15(三)我国对外国法院判决的审查事项16(四)我国承认与执行外国法院判决后的效力问题研究22三、我国承认与执行外国法院判决的困境23(一)立法制定的不足23(二)我国实践中实行“实质互惠”原则的问题25(三)没有参加一个统一的公约27四、我国承认与执行外国法院判决的出路28(一)完善立法规定,将标准具体化29(二)从“事实互惠”向“法律互惠”、“推定互惠”转变31(三)加入《选择法院协议公约》34结 语38参考文献39致 谢42
回到顶部