预售商品房契税征收规则研究

Study on the deed tax rules of pre-sale commercial houses

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

作者:

帅思璐

导师:

李玉虎

导师单位:

经济法学院

学位:

硕士

语种:

其他

关键词:

契税溯及力;计税价格;征收规则;纳税义务发生时间

摘要:

2017年10月发布的十九大报告中提出深化税收制度改革,健全地方税体系是完善社会主义市场经济的关键。契税作为我国地方税收收入中的重要组成部分,从经济方面的影响而言,当契税制度适应我国经济发展现状时,会对地方财政收入增长和国家经济平稳运行产生促进作用,尤其表现在房地产市场方面。而从税收法律体系的角度来说,契税制度也有其独特的作用。2018年3月召开的十三届全国人大第一次会议中提出了认真贯彻落实税收法定原则,争取在2020年前完成将现有税收条例修改上升为法律的税法改革任务。因而,契税征收规则的改革与完善,在我国经济建设和法治建设中都发挥着重要作用。然而,契税这个税种作为地方财政收入的一项重要来源,由于其所涉及的行业多,特别是与我国国民经济重要行业——房地产联系非常紧密,所以在税收征管实践中也面临着许多热点和难点问题,产生了不少的契税纠纷,其中又以预售商品房契税纠纷居多,而产生纠纷的根源还是在于契税征收规则存在诸多不足之处,需要通过建立健全契税法律法规,来对具体的规则性漏洞作出弥补。故而,本文以研究预售商品房契税征收规则为落脚点,在诸多契税争议案例中选取了吴某诉北京市朝阳区第六税务所和邱某诉佛山市南海区财政局契税征收纠纷案进行切入,提炼其中契税征收规则的争议之处进行深入分析,针对案例分析现行预售商品房契税征收规则中存在的问题,进而提出自己的完善建议。本文除主体内容外,共分五个部分。第一部分是由预售商品房契税争议案例引发的思考。在本部分中,首先介绍了所选案例的案情及法院审理情况,进而提出了其中涉及契税征收规则中契税纳税义务发生时间、契税优惠政策溯及力和全装修住宅契税计税价格的三个争议。第二部分是对预售商品房契税纳税义务发生时间的确认进行探讨。在本部分中,首先对这一义务发生时间的实践分歧和理论争议进行论述,进而分析上述争议的产生原因,再结合相似案例阐述界定模糊导致的不良后果。第三部分对案例所涉及的地方契税优惠政策溯及力问题进行研究。在本部分中, 首先结合相似案例分析现行契税优惠政策溯及力的适用现状,再对税法溯及力问题进行法律分析,最后回归到地方契税优惠政策的溯及力问题研究。第四部分结合案例对预售商品房中全装修住宅的计税价格的认定进行分析。在本部分中,首先对全装修住宅契税计税价格的认定依据进行法律评析,进而从法律角度论述契税对于全装修住宅普及的影响,最后探讨当前规定的不合理性可能带来的问题。第五部分由案例所引发的思考。在本部分中,结合所引案例反映出的我国现行契税征收规则的不足之处,针对性地提出完善建议,以期我国契税征收规则更为合法合理,便于实行。

参考文献:

43

学科:

经济法学

提交日期

2019-04-11

引用参考

帅思璐. 预售商品房契税征收规则研究[D]. 西南政法大学,2018.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 预售商品房契税征收规则研究
  • dc.title
  • Study on the deed tax rules of pre-sale commercial houses
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20160062011700
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 帅思璐
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 经济法学院(生态法学院)
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法律硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2018
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 李玉虎
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 经济法学院
  • dc.language.iso
  • 其他
  • dc.subject
  • 契税溯及力;计税价格;征收规则;纳税义务发生时间
  • dc.subject
  • deed tax retroactive effect;taxable price;rules of levy;tax liability occurrence time
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 2017年10月发布的十九大报告中提出深化税收制度改革,健全地方税体系是完善社会主义市场经济的关键。契税作为我国地方税收收入中的重要组成部分,从经济方面的影响而言,当契税制度适应我国经济发展现状时,会对地方财政收入增长和国家经济平稳运行产生促进作用,尤其表现在房地产市场方面。而从税收法律体系的角度来说,契税制度也有其独特的作用。2018年3月召开的十三届全国人大第一次会议中提出了认真贯彻落实税收法定原则,争取在2020年前完成将现有税收条例修改上升为法律的税法改革任务。因而,契税征收规则的改革与完善,在我国经济建设和法治建设中都发挥着重要作用。然而,契税这个税种作为地方财政收入的一项重要来源,由于其所涉及的行业多,特别是与我国国民经济重要行业——房地产联系非常紧密,所以在税收征管实践中也面临着许多热点和难点问题,产生了不少的契税纠纷,其中又以预售商品房契税纠纷居多,而产生纠纷的根源还是在于契税征收规则存在诸多不足之处,需要通过建立健全契税法律法规,来对具体的规则性漏洞作出弥补。故而,本文以研究预售商品房契税征收规则为落脚点,在诸多契税争议案例中选取了吴某诉北京市朝阳区第六税务所和邱某诉佛山市南海区财政局契税征收纠纷案进行切入,提炼其中契税征收规则的争议之处进行深入分析,针对案例分析现行预售商品房契税征收规则中存在的问题,进而提出自己的完善建议。本文除主体内容外,共分五个部分。第一部分是由预售商品房契税争议案例引发的思考。在本部分中,首先介绍了所选案例的案情及法院审理情况,进而提出了其中涉及契税征收规则中契税纳税义务发生时间、契税优惠政策溯及力和全装修住宅契税计税价格的三个争议。第二部分是对预售商品房契税纳税义务发生时间的确认进行探讨。在本部分中,首先对这一义务发生时间的实践分歧和理论争议进行论述,进而分析上述争议的产生原因,再结合相似案例阐述界定模糊导致的不良后果。第三部分对案例所涉及的地方契税优惠政策溯及力问题进行研究。在本部分中, 首先结合相似案例分析现行契税优惠政策溯及力的适用现状,再对税法溯及力问题进行法律分析,最后回归到地方契税优惠政策的溯及力问题研究。第四部分结合案例对预售商品房中全装修住宅的计税价格的认定进行分析。在本部分中,首先对全装修住宅契税计税价格的认定依据进行法律评析,进而从法律角度论述契税对于全装修住宅普及的影响,最后探讨当前规定的不合理性可能带来的问题。第五部分由案例所引发的思考。在本部分中,结合所引案例反映出的我国现行契税征收规则的不足之处,针对性地提出完善建议,以期我国契税征收规则更为合法合理,便于实行。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The report at 19th CPC National Congress released in October 2017 proposed deepening the reform of the taxation system and improving the local tax system is the key to improving the socialist market economy. Deed tax is an important component of China's local tax revenue. In terms of economic impact,when the deed tax system adapts to the current state of economic development in China, it can contribute to the growth of local fiscal revenue and the smooth operation of the national economy, especially in the real estate market. From the point of view of the tax legal system, the deed tax system also has its own unique role.the first session of the 13th National People’s Congress in March 2018 put forward the conscientious implementation of the statutory principles of taxation, and strive to complete the tax reform task of amendment of existing tax regulations into law by 2020. Therefore, the reform and improvement of the deed tax levy rules play an important role in our country's economic construction and the rule of law. However, the deed tax as an important source of local fiscal revenue, but because of its many industries involved, especially with China's important national economy industry - real estate is very close, so in the tax collection and management practice is also facing many hot spots and difficulties, resulting in a lot of deed tax disputes, which in turn pre-sale commodity tax disputes are mostly, and the root cause of disputes lies in the deed tax rules have many deficiencies, we need to establish and improve deed tax laws and regulations to make up for loopholes. Therefore, this article takes the pre-sale commodity house deed tax collection rules as the end result. In many cases of deed tax disputes, Mrs.Wu selected v. Chaoyang District No. 6 Tax Office and Mrs.Qiu v. Foshan Nanhai District Finance Bureau deed tax levy case to enter , The controversy in which the deed tax levy rules were extracted was analyzed in depth, and the problems existing in the existing pre-sale commodity deed tax levy rules were analyzed for the cases, and then their own perfect suggestions were put forward.In addition to the main content, this article is divided into five parts.The first part is the thinking triggered by the case of the pre-sale commodity housing deed tax. In this section, the case of the selected case and the court hearing were first introduced, and then three of them were proposed, involving the time when the deed tax liability was imposed in the deed tax collection rules, the retroactivity of the deed tax preferential policy and the fully-decorated residential deed tax deduction price dispute.The second part is to discuss the confirmation of the time when the pre-sale commodity house deed tax liability occurs. In this section, first of all, we discuss the practical differences and theoretical disputes at the time of the occurrence of this obligation, and then analyze the reasons for the above-mentioned disputes. Then we combine the similar cases to illustrate the ill-defined consequences of ambiguity.The third part examines the issue of retroactivity of local deed tax policies involved in cases. In this section, we first analyze the current situation of retroactive application of the existing preferential tax policies in conjunction with similar cases, then conduct a legal analysis on the retroactivity of tax laws, and finally return to the study of the retroactivity of local tax benefits.The fourth part analyzes the determination of the taxable price of fully-decorated houses in pre-sale commercial houses in combination with cases. In this section, first of all, the legal basis for the determination of the deed tax price of fully-decorated residential houses is analyzed, and then the impact of deeds tax on the popularity of fully-decorated residential houses is discussed from the legal point of view. Finally, the possible problems caused by the irrationality of current regulations are discussed.The fifth part of the thinking caused by the case. In this section, in light of the inadequacies of China's current deed tax collection rules reflected in the cited cases, we have made targeted recommendations for perfection, in the hope that the China's deed tax collection rules will be more legal and reasonable and easy to implement.
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2026-04-01
  • dc.date.oralDefense
  • 2018-05-12
  • dc.relation.citedreferences
  • 43
  • dc.relation.relatedpublications
  • 引言1(一)问题的提出1(二)文献综述2(三)研究方法3(四)本文的创新点和重点难点3一、预售商品房契税案例引发的争议4(一)吴某诉北京市朝阳区第六税务所契税征收案5(二)邱某诉佛山市南海区财政局契税征收案6(三)案件引发的争议8二、预售商品房契税纳税义务发生时间的确认8(一)预售商品房契税纳税义务发生时间的分歧9(二)预售商品房契税纳税义务发生时间产生争议的原因11(三)预售商品房契税纳税义务发生时间界定模糊的弊端13三、预售商品房契税优惠政策的溯及力15(一)预售商品房契税优惠政策溯及力现状16(二)税收法规溯及力的法律分析17(三)地方契税优惠政策的溯及力19四、预售商品房中全装修住宅契税计税价格的认定20(一)对全装修住宅契税计税价格认定依据的法律评析21(二)契税对全装修住宅产业的影响22(三)对房屋装修费用征收契税将存在后续问题24五、完善我国预售商品房契税征收规则的建议25(一)以税收法定主义为原则推动契税法律化进程25(二)修改《契税暂行条例》第八条的规定26(三)调整现行契税优惠制度27(四)变更全装修住宅中契税计税价格的规定27结语29参考文献30
回到顶部