国际海上货物运输合同关系下货方诉权问题研究

Study on the rights of suit in respect of international carriage of good by sea

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属院系:

国际法学院

作者:

陈汉瑛

导师:

宋渝玲

导师单位:

国际法学院

学位:

硕士

语种:

其他

关键词:

国际海上货物运输;货方;诉权

摘要:

提单的物权性与债权性之间的关系、缔约托运人以外的第三人取得运输合同下诉权是否需要突破合同相对性等等问题,一直是海上货物运输合同下货方诉权问题研究中的争议不断的核心论题。合同相对性作为一项合同原则,反映了合同的本质特征,合同相对性是合同构成的逻辑形式,离开相对性,合同难再被谓之以合同;相对性是合同客观内在规律,是不可能被突破的,海上货物运输合同并不是孤立的存在,它与国际货物贸易合同、提单法律关系、托管关系相互交叉渗透,呈现出独具的特征。为第三人利益说、合同转让说、证券关系说都能在某种程度上揭示出海上货物运输合同的不同侧面的法律性质。本文即是本着以上的研究思路,大胆假设小心求证,为货方诉权寻找法理依据。第一章,简单介绍诉权概念理论,对什么是“海上货物运输合同下货方诉权”作出解释。第二章,通过分析国际货物买卖合同、海上货物运输合同及海运提单的衔接关联,从更加宽广的视角去观察和分析提单转让在海运合同中的意义,对提单法律关系下和海运合同关系下各自的权利义务作出区分,对提单性质和海上货物运输合同性质作出准确认定。第三章,分析了托运人在提单内、外的合同诉权,在FOB术语下的不同托运人取得合同诉权的可能性,并建议对托运人在立法上作出细分和定义。第四章,论述了提单持有人与收货人的转换关系,收货人或提单持有人是怎样与承运人发生违约或侵权关系的。并提出对有关诉权立法模式的看法。

学科:

国际法学

提交日期

2019-04-11

引用参考

陈汉瑛. 国际海上货物运输合同关系下货方诉权问题研究[D]. 西南政法大学,2018.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 国际海上货物运输合同关系下货方诉权问题研究
  • dc.title
  • Study on the rights of suit in respect of international carriage of good by sea
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20150071011445
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 陈汉瑛
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 国际法学院
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法律硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2018
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 宋渝玲
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 国际法学院
  • dc.language.iso
  • 其他
  • dc.subject
  • 国际海上货物运输;货方;诉权
  • dc.subject
  • International Carriage of Goods by Sea;Cargo Interests;Right of Suit
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 提单的物权性与债权性之间的关系、缔约托运人以外的第三人取得运输合同下诉权是否需要突破合同相对性等等问题,一直是海上货物运输合同下货方诉权问题研究中的争议不断的核心论题。合同相对性作为一项合同原则,反映了合同的本质特征,合同相对性是合同构成的逻辑形式,离开相对性,合同难再被谓之以合同;相对性是合同客观内在规律,是不可能被突破的,海上货物运输合同并不是孤立的存在,它与国际货物贸易合同、提单法律关系、托管关系相互交叉渗透,呈现出独具的特征。为第三人利益说、合同转让说、证券关系说都能在某种程度上揭示出海上货物运输合同的不同侧面的法律性质。本文即是本着以上的研究思路,大胆假设小心求证,为货方诉权寻找法理依据。第一章,简单介绍诉权概念理论,对什么是“海上货物运输合同下货方诉权”作出解释。第二章,通过分析国际货物买卖合同、海上货物运输合同及海运提单的衔接关联,从更加宽广的视角去观察和分析提单转让在海运合同中的意义,对提单法律关系下和海运合同关系下各自的权利义务作出区分,对提单性质和海上货物运输合同性质作出准确认定。第三章,分析了托运人在提单内、外的合同诉权,在FOB术语下的不同托运人取得合同诉权的可能性,并建议对托运人在立法上作出细分和定义。第四章,论述了提单持有人与收货人的转换关系,收货人或提单持有人是怎样与承运人发生违约或侵权关系的。并提出对有关诉权立法模式的看法。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Such matters as The relationship between real right and creditor's rights of the bill of lading, Whether the third party other than the Contracting Shipper needs circumvention of contract privity to exercise the right of suit in respect of contract of carriage of goods by sea and so on, has been amongst the core subjects under violent disputes of the right of suit by the cargo interests for the carriage contract. The privity of contract as a doctrine of contract, reflects the nature of the contract, it is the logical form of contract constitution. When deprives the contract of its privity ,that contract cannot be called by the contract; the privity of contract is the objective rule and unlikely to make a breakthrough of which, as contract of carriage of goods by sea is not isolated thing and it makes a close connection with the contract of international goods trade, the legal relationship for the bill of lading and trusteeship, showing a unique feature. “Contract for the benefit of a third party, contract transfer, security relationship” can to some extent reveal the legal nature on the different aspects of contract of carriage of goods by sea. This paper is just based on the above principle to make bold assumptions and pursue careful verification, provides jurisprudence basis for the right of suit by the cargo interests.The first chapter introduces the concept of right of action, explains what is “the right of suit by the cargo interests for the contract of carriage of goods by sea”.The second chapter is through the analysis of connection between the contract of carriage goods by sea, the contract of international sale of goods and ocean bills of lading, to observe and analyze the significance of the transfer of bills of lading in the contract of carriage of goods by sea from a more broad perspective, to distinguish the rights and obligations within the legal relationship for bill of lading from those under contract of carriage of goods by sea, to make an accurate characterization of bill of lading and contract of carriage of goods by sea .The third chapter analyzes the shipper's contractual right of suit within or outside of the bill of lading, the possibility of asserting the contractual right of suit by different shippers under the FOB terms, and gives suggestion that the concept of shipper should be subdivided and redefined in legislationThe fourth chapter discusses the conversion relationship between holder of bill of lading and consignee, and how consignee or the holder of bill of lading is related to breach of contract of carriage of goods by sea or infringement of rights to which the former are entitled by carrier. And later presents author’s own viewpoint about the model of legislation arrangement concerning the right of suit by cargo interests.
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2026-04-01
  • dc.date.oralDefense
  • 2018-05-18
回到顶部