国有财产的中央与地方分权研究

The Basic Question Research Of Propertys Of The Local Ownership

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

作者:

冯乐坤

导师:

谭启平

导师单位:

民商法学院(知识产权学院)

学位:

博士

语种:

其他

关键词:

国有财产;中央与地方之间的财产分权;地方所有财产

摘要:

自继受前苏联公有制中的国有财产理论以来,我国国有财产范围不仅极其广泛,又遍及全国各地,因国有财产统一由中央作为统一主体进行具体管理也不现实,为了调动地方的积极性,国有财产一直存在着中央与地方之间的分权管理,中央与地方一直分享着国有财产的利益,各级地方对其直接支配的国有财产事实上已经处于享有所有权之实,但各级地方所直接支配财产仍然被视为国有,中央与地方之间的利益冲突就会不断发生,为此,在借鉴前苏联后期以及俄罗斯立法转而采纳对国有财产实行的中央与地方分别所有以及各主要国家所采纳地方所有理念的基础上,我国理应赋予各级地方对其直接管理支配的国有财产享有所有权。不过,我国地方所有是将部分国有财产主体从国家变更为地方,地方所有财产其实就是对国有财产在中央与地方之间具体进行财产分权的结果,立法就应确定中央与各级地方之间对国有财产的具体划分标准,各级地方所有财产范围也就最终得以确定。然而,受各国行政区划所形成的各个地方均为地方所有权主体的影响,地方所有层级往往与地方层级具有对应性,地方所有权的形成其实就是以各国不同的行政区划制度为基础,既然我国目前行政区划所形成的地方层级实行三级或者四级模式,我国地方所有层级理应分为省级、地级、县级、乡镇级等层级,因现实中的我国地方层级处于变动之中,地方所有财产必然会面临在各级之间进行具体分割,具体分割标准理应予以明确。当然,未来立法在对地方所有财产规定的过程中,不仅要适用各级地方所有权平等、利益衡量的理念,也要采纳“一般 分散”的立法模式,即宪法、民法进行一般性规定的同时,相关单行法也应对其加以规定,尤其要允许各地方根据本地方实际情形而对各级地方所有财产范围进行规定。

学科:

民商法学

提交日期

2019-04-11

引用参考

冯乐坤. 国有财产的中央与地方分权研究[D]. 西南政法大学,2015.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 国有财产的中央与地方分权研究
  • dc.title
  • The Basic Question Research Of Propertys Of The Local Ownership
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • b2011030105042
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 冯乐坤
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 民商法学院(知识产权学院)
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 博士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法学博士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2015
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 谭启平
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 民商法学院(知识产权学院)
  • dc.language.iso
  • 其他
  • dc.subject
  • 国有财产;;;中央与地方之间的财产分权;地方所有财产
  • dc.subject
  • The propertys of state ownership ;The separation of powers of property between the central and local;The propertys of local ownership
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 自继受前苏联公有制中的国有财产理论以来,我国国有财产范围不仅极其广泛,又遍及全国各地,因国有财产统一由中央作为统一主体进行具体管理也不现实,为了调动地方的积极性,国有财产一直存在着中央与地方之间的分权管理,中央与地方一直分享着国有财产的利益,各级地方对其直接支配的国有财产事实上已经处于享有所有权之实,但各级地方所直接支配财产仍然被视为国有,中央与地方之间的利益冲突就会不断发生,为此,在借鉴前苏联后期以及俄罗斯立法转而采纳对国有财产实行的中央与地方分别所有以及各主要国家所采纳地方所有理念的基础上,我国理应赋予各级地方对其直接管理支配的国有财产享有所有权。不过,我国地方所有是将部分国有财产主体从国家变更为地方,地方所有财产其实就是对国有财产在中央与地方之间具体进行财产分权的结果,立法就应确定中央与各级地方之间对国有财产的具体划分标准,各级地方所有财产范围也就最终得以确定。然而,受各国行政区划所形成的各个地方均为地方所有权主体的影响,地方所有层级往往与地方层级具有对应性,地方所有权的形成其实就是以各国不同的行政区划制度为基础,既然我国目前行政区划所形成的地方层级实行三级或者四级模式,我国地方所有层级理应分为省级、地级、县级、乡镇级等层级,因现实中的我国地方层级处于变动之中,地方所有财产必然会面临在各级之间进行具体分割,具体分割标准理应予以明确。当然,未来立法在对地方所有财产规定的过程中,不仅要适用各级地方所有权平等、利益衡量的理念,也要采纳“一般 分散”的立法模式,即宪法、民法进行一般性规定的同时,相关单行法也应对其加以规定,尤其要允许各地方根据本地方实际情形而对各级地方所有财产范围进行规定。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Since after our countey inherited the former Soviet union in the public sector of the national property theory, our country state-owned property is not only extremely extensive, and throughout all parts of the country, because of the state-owned property is unified by the central as a unified subject specific management also not reality, in order to arouse the enthusiasm of the local, there has always been the central and local state-owned property between the decentralized management, central and local have been sharing the interests of the state property, local to the direct control of the state-owned property in fact already in the reality of the ownership, but local direct control is still considered as state-owned property, conflicts of interest between the central and local will occur constantly, therefore, in the late draw lessons from the former Soviet union and Russia to adopt legislation to implement the central and local state-owned property respectively adopted by all and in the major countries where all ideas, on the basis of our country at all levels should give place to the direct management of the state-owned property right to ownership.However, the property of local ownership is partly state-owned property from the state changed to place, where all property is actually on state-owned property between central and local specific property is the result of the separation of powers, legislation should be determined between the central and local specific classification standards of national property,the scope of the property of local ownership will eventually determine. However, the different parts are formed by the national administrative divisions of local ownership, the influence of the local all levels tend to local level with the correspondence, the formation of local ownership is based on the administrative division system in different countries around, since China's current administrative divisions of the local level to level 3 or level 4 pattern, our country should be divided into local all levels at the provincial-level, prefecture-level city, county and township-level level, because of the reality of our country local level under change, where all property is bound to be faced at all levels between specific segmentation, specific segmentation criteria should be clear.Future legislation, of course, in the process of all the property of local regulations, should not only apply to local ownership of equality, the principle of benefit measure should also adopt "general dispersed" legislative mode, namely the general provisions of the constitution, civil law at the same time, it should also be related special law regulation, especially to allow each place according to the actual situation and be explicitly stipulated the scope of the property of local ownership.
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2026-01-14
  • dc.date.oralDefense
  • 2015-12-05
回到顶部