法律文本中回指的认知研究

A COGNITIVE STUDY OF ANAPHORA IN LEGAL TEXT

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属院系:

外语学院

作者:

马建淋

导师:

肖云枢

导师单位:

外语学院

学位:

硕士

语种:

其他

关键词:

回指;零形回指;可及性;法律文本

摘要:

作为一种常见的语言现象,回指是指先于语言表层的对某个实体的引入。在不同的语言学分支中,回指的作用大有不同。正如从认知角度研习回指现象的语言学家Ariel 所述,说话者在话语中使用不同指示词语的原因在于向听话者展示话语实体的可及性差异。因此当谈及指称表达的功能时,就不得不谈到可及性这一概念。可及性指的是从生成或理解某种语言的过程中或从记忆单元中抽取出的某个记忆片段的难度或方便程度。本文从认知角度结合可及性理论对法律文本中的回指现象进行分析。   法律文本具有逻辑严密、结构紧凑以及高度程式化等特点。为准确传达立法信息、体现立法意图,立法者常常在立法文本中使用多种衔接手段,回指便是其中很重要的一种。法律文本中的回指可分为三种:名词性回指,代词性回指和零形回指,零形回指出现的频率最高。本文将对三种回指的构成模式进行剖析并对零形回指做出进一步的详述。   回指作为一种常用的衔接手段在不同的文体中有不同的解释方式,除回指的应用机制外,本文还用适当篇幅分析其词汇、语法、句法、语篇等功能。同时, 法律文本中回指的三种形式的特征在本文中也有所涉及,作者在对一些特定文本进行分析后,结合可及性理论提出回指在立法文本中的应用机制,即回指的可及性与话题的明显程度、句子的概念意义相关。最后,本文参照Lyons 对于回指的解释模式以及前人的研究成果,提出基于可及性理论的法律文本中回指现象的解释模式。

学科:

外国语言学及应用语言学

提交日期

2019-04-11

引用参考

马建淋. 法律文本中回指的认知研究[D]. 西南政法大学,2014.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 法律文本中回指的认知研究
  • dc.title
  • A COGNITIVE STUDY OF ANAPHORA IN LEGAL TEXT
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20110502111534
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 马建淋
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 外语学院
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 文学硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2014
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 肖云枢
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 外语学院
  • dc.language.iso
  • 其他
  • dc.subject
  • 回指;零形回指;可及性;法律文本
  • dc.subject
  • anaphora;zero anaphora;accessibility;legal text
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 作为一种常见的语言现象,回指是指先于语言表层的对某个实体的引入。在不同的语言学分支中,回指的作用大有不同。正如从认知角度研习回指现象的语言学家Ariel 所述,说话者在话语中使用不同指示词语的原因在于向听话者展示话语实体的可及性差异。因此当谈及指称表达的功能时,就不得不谈到可及性这一概念。可及性指的是从生成或理解某种语言的过程中或从记忆单元中抽取出的某个记忆片段的难度或方便程度。本文从认知角度结合可及性理论对法律文本中的回指现象进行分析。   法律文本具有逻辑严密、结构紧凑以及高度程式化等特点。为准确传达立法信息、体现立法意图,立法者常常在立法文本中使用多种衔接手段,回指便是其中很重要的一种。法律文本中的回指可分为三种:名词性回指,代词性回指和零形回指,零形回指出现的频率最高。本文将对三种回指的构成模式进行剖析并对零形回指做出进一步的详述。   回指作为一种常用的衔接手段在不同的文体中有不同的解释方式,除回指的应用机制外,本文还用适当篇幅分析其词汇、语法、句法、语篇等功能。同时, 法律文本中回指的三种形式的特征在本文中也有所涉及,作者在对一些特定文本进行分析后,结合可及性理论提出回指在立法文本中的应用机制,即回指的可及性与话题的明显程度、句子的概念意义相关。最后,本文参照Lyons 对于回指的解释模式以及前人的研究成果,提出基于可及性理论的法律文本中回指现象的解释模式。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Anaphora is a kind of language phenomena occurring in almost all kinds of texts. It is used to refer to the initial introduction of some entity out of the surface level of language. Anaphora performs the different roles in all branches of linguistics. As suggested by Ariel, who researches into anaphora from the cognitive perspective, the reason why the speaker or writer tries to use different types of referents in his/her text is that he/she aims to show to the hearer or reader the different accessibility of the entity. Thus when it comes to the function of referential expressions, accessibility marker shall take its appearance. Accessibility refers to the degree of difficulty or convenience of dragging some memorizing unit from the brain’s memorizing system in the process of people’s producing and understanding some language or memorizing unit. Combined with its cognitive role, anaphora in this paper is analyzed with respect to the legal text. The legal text is a special type of legal language in its logic arrangement, tight structure and high formula. In order to convey legal information and reach legal intentions, legislators use all kinds of cohesive devices to have the legal text understood, among which anaphora is an important type. Anaphora in the legal text can be classified into three types, namely noun phrase anaphora, pronominal anaphora and zero anaphora, and zero anaphora is the one that appears at the highest frequency. This dissertation highlights on the forming mode of all the three types of anaphora with some elaborations on zero anaphora. As a commonly-used cohesive device, anaphora performs different functions in different kinds of languages, namely grammatical function, lexical function, syntactic function, and textual function. Apart from the application of the anaphora in the legal text, various functions of anaphora are analyzed in this thesis. More importantly, the interpersonal function is also discussed in this thesis for the purpose of achieving the best effect that the legal texts are fully understood and put into practice.    At the same time, the characteristics of the three classes are discussed respectively with respect to the legal text. Then the author studies several given legal texts to find out the mechanism of the application of anaphora in the legal text. The interpretation of anaphora is related to the explicitness of the subject and the conceptual meaning of the sentence. At last, a figure of cognitive mode of the resolution of anaphora with respect to accessibility based on the previous researches is carried out to resolve anaphora in the legal text according to Lyons’s explanation of anaphora(Lyons, 1977).
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2026-04-13
  • dc.date.oralDefense
  • 2014-05-17
  • dc.relation.relatedpublications
  • Contents Acknowledgements i Abstract ii 摘要 iv Chapter 1 Introduction.............................................................................................1 1.1 Research Background 1 1.2 Research Aims and Significance 2 1.3 Layout 3 Chapter 2 Literature Review 4 2.1Relevant Studies on Anaphora 4 2.1.1 Definition of Anaphora 4 2.1.2 Antecedent and Anaphor 5 2.1.3 Reference 5 2.1.4 Discourse 5 2.2 Previous Studies of Anaphora in Linguistic Field 6 2.2.1 Anaphora Researches in Syntax 6 2.2.2 Anaphora Researches in Pragmatics. 7 2.2.3 Anaphora Researches in Cognitive Linguistics. 8 Chapter 3 The Cognitive Theoretical Foundations on Anaphora 11 3.1 The‘Cognitive’Approach to Anaphora 11 3.2 Accessibility Theory 12 3.2.1 The Reasons for Causing Accessibility 12 3.2.2Marking Scale of Accessibility 12 3.2.3 Confining Matters of Accessibility 13 3.3 The Application of Accessibility Theory in Legal Text 14 3.3.1 Characteristics of Legal Text 14 3.3.2 Accessibility Theory Applied in Legal Text 15 3.3.3 Conceptual Reference Point Model of Anaphora 17 3.3.4 Relevance-Bridging Model of Anaphora 18 Chapter 4 Characteristicsof Anaphora in Legal Text 20 4.1 Classifications of the Forms of Anaphora..........................................................20 4.2 Classifications of Anaphora in Legal Text 20 4.3 The Mechanism of Application of Anaphora in Legal Text 22 4.3.1 Characteristics of Anaphora......................................................................22 4.3.2 The Relationship Between the Antecedent and its Anaphor......................23 Chapter 5 The Application and Resolution of Anaphora in Legal Text.............26 5.1 The Relationship Between Prominence and Accessibility 26 5.2 Accessibility Concerned Application of Anaphora in Legal Text 27 5.2.1 Application of NP Anaphora 27 5.2.2 Application of Pronominal Anaphora 29 5.2.3 Application of Zero Anaphora...................................................................33 5.3 Accessibility Related Resolution of Anaphora in Legal Text.............................36 5.3.1 Resolution of NP Anphora 36 5.3.2 Resolution of Pronominal Anaphora 40 5.3.3 Resolution of Zero Anaphora....................................................................41 5.4Accessibility Concerned Resolution of Pronominal Anaphora and Zero Anaphora............................................................................................................41 Chapter 6 Conclusion .............................................................................................43 6.1 Summary.............................................................................................................43 6.2 Implications........................................................................................................43 6.3 Limitations.........................................................................................................44 References...................................................................................................................45
回到顶部