权利要求撰写错误对专利保护范围的影响

The writing errors of the patent claim impact on the scope of patent protection

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属院系:

法律硕士学院

作者:

李宗

导师:

马海生

导师单位:

民商法学院

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

权利要求;撰写错误;专利保护范围

摘要:

在我国专利保护领域,专利权保护范围的确定直接取决于权利要求书,所以权利要求的撰写质量将会对专利权的保护范围产生很大的影响。由于专利申请自身技术和法律层面知识的复杂性、语言表达的局限性和人类认知的有限性等限制,权利要求的撰写往往难以尽善尽美,专利保护范围也难以得到最终确定。本文通过对最高人民法院颁布的2012年知识产权十大创新案件中“秦邦公司专利纠纷案”的分析和讨论,试图明晰案件所涉及的基础概念和法律关系,探究法院在处理案件时所遵循的法理依据,进而为以后类似案件的处理提供一些指导。本文共分为三个部分:第一部分是案情简介及争议焦点。本部分简要地回顾案件的始末,以各级法院不同法理考量为基础,发现本案及相似案例可能涉及到的争议焦点为:如果权利要求撰写存在错误,那么这种撰写错误是否会对专利保护范围产生影响及产生何种影响? 第二部分是权利要求撰写的不同错误类型。本文将权利要求撰写的错误类型分为三类:1.权利要求撰写文字错误,2.权利要求遗漏说明书中公开的部分技术方案,3.无法界定专利保护范围。对于其中的权利要求撰写文字错误,又进行再次划分:明显的文字错误,歧义性文字错误,术语使用错误。本文将错误类型进行区分的同时,引用到了大量的案例,使文中提到的错误类型更加明确。第三部分是权利要求撰写错误对专利保护范围的影响。本文针对权利要求撰写的不同错误类型,对应分析其对专利保护范围产生的影响,从理论上找到判断的依据。结语部分结合不同的权利要求撰写错误类型,分析我国专利保护的双重管理体制,并为提高专利申请文件的撰写质量建言。本文案例所体现的实质还是权利要求撰写质量的问题。正因为一审、二审法院认定权利要求用语存在错误,进而认为专利保护范围不明确,才使得权利要求撰写错误对专利保护范围的影响凸显出来。只有采取措施切实提高权利要求的撰写质量,才会使专利保护范围尽量得以明确。

学科:

民商法学

提交日期

2019-04-11

引用参考

李宗. 权利要求撰写错误对专利保护范围的影响[D]. 西南政法大学,2014.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 权利要求撰写错误对专利保护范围的影响
  • dc.title
  • The writing errors of the patent claim impact on the scope of patent protection
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20110351011129
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 李宗
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法律硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2014
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 马海生
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 民商法学院
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 权利要求;撰写错误;专利保护范围
  • dc.subject
  • patent claim;writing errors;the scope of patent protection
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 在我国专利保护领域,专利权保护范围的确定直接取决于权利要求书,所以权利要求的撰写质量将会对专利权的保护范围产生很大的影响。由于专利申请自身技术和法律层面知识的复杂性、语言表达的局限性和人类认知的有限性等限制,权利要求的撰写往往难以尽善尽美,专利保护范围也难以得到最终确定。本文通过对最高人民法院颁布的2012年知识产权十大创新案件中“秦邦公司专利纠纷案”的分析和讨论,试图明晰案件所涉及的基础概念和法律关系,探究法院在处理案件时所遵循的法理依据,进而为以后类似案件的处理提供一些指导。本文共分为三个部分:第一部分是案情简介及争议焦点。本部分简要地回顾案件的始末,以各级法院不同法理考量为基础,发现本案及相似案例可能涉及到的争议焦点为:如果权利要求撰写存在错误,那么这种撰写错误是否会对专利保护范围产生影响及产生何种影响? 第二部分是权利要求撰写的不同错误类型。本文将权利要求撰写的错误类型分为三类:1.权利要求撰写文字错误,2.权利要求遗漏说明书中公开的部分技术方案,3.无法界定专利保护范围。对于其中的权利要求撰写文字错误,又进行再次划分:明显的文字错误,歧义性文字错误,术语使用错误。本文将错误类型进行区分的同时,引用到了大量的案例,使文中提到的错误类型更加明确。第三部分是权利要求撰写错误对专利保护范围的影响。本文针对权利要求撰写的不同错误类型,对应分析其对专利保护范围产生的影响,从理论上找到判断的依据。结语部分结合不同的权利要求撰写错误类型,分析我国专利保护的双重管理体制,并为提高专利申请文件的撰写质量建言。本文案例所体现的实质还是权利要求撰写质量的问题。正因为一审、二审法院认定权利要求用语存在错误,进而认为专利保护范围不明确,才使得权利要求撰写错误对专利保护范围的影响凸显出来。只有采取措施切实提高权利要求的撰写质量,才会使专利保护范围尽量得以明确。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The scope of patent protection depends directly on the claims in the field of patent protection, so the writing quality of the patent claims will have a huge impact on the scope of patent protection. Due to the complexity of the patent application of the technical and legal aspects of knowledge, and the limited nature of language limitations and restrictions of human cognition, it is difficult to make the writing of the patent claims perfect and get the final OK. Based on the 2012 top ten innovative intellectual property cases in the Supreme People's Court promulgated "the company Qinpont patent dispute ," the analysis and discussion are trying to clear some of the basic concepts and legal relationships involved in the case ,and get the basis of legal case judgment, thus provide some guidance for the future treatment of similar cases . The article is divided into three parts . Part I the court Introduction and focus of controversy . In this paper the case selected from the top ten innovations of 2012 cases in the proceedings, and the paper briefly review the whole story of the case, based on different legal considerations of the courts,to explore the disputes content related to the similar cases:If the patent claim does exist writing mistakes, whether the error would affect the scope of patent protection? Part II the different types of errors of the written claim . In this paper the wrong type of patent claim is divided into three categories:1 the text error of the patent claims; 2 the missing part of the technical program of the patent claims disclosed in the specification; 3 it is impossible to define the scope of patent protection.The writing errors of the patent claims is divided into three parts: obvious text errors, ambiguities textual errors,the use of the wrong terminology.This paper make the wrong type mentioned in the text more clear by a reference to the large number of cases,distinguishing the wrong type of error at the same time. Part III the writing errors of the patent claims affect the scope of patent protection.This paper analysis their impact on the scope of patent protection for a different type of error, to find the basis for judgment from the theory. The conclusion combine with the different types of the writing errors of the patent claims, the dual management system to the patent protection ,and suggest to improve the quality of patent documents as well . The essence of the paper is still writing errors of the patent claims.Because the first and the second trial court found that there is an error term in the patent claims, thus that it’s hard to define the scope of patent protection,and make the writing errors of the patent claims’ influence on the the scope of patent protection highlighted.Only taking measures to improve the quality of the patent claims effectively, will we make the scope of patent protection clear.
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2026-01-19
  • dc.date.oralDefense
  • 2014-05-10
回到顶部