民法典绿色原则:何以可能以及如何展开

Green Principle of China Civil Code: How to and why it Develops

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

侯国跃

归属院系：

民商法学院（知识产权学院）

作者：

侯国跃 ;刘玖林

摘要：

绿色原则析出为民法基本原则,不仅将调整范围从人与人之间延伸至人与自然之间,而且实现了绿色发展从理念到制度的飞跃。为实现法的安定性以及法的现实化,避免绿色原则沦为"空中楼阁",在民法典分编编纂过程中,宜将绿色原则浸润至相应法律制度。就民法典物权编而言,宜完善我国相邻关系制度,扩大相邻范围,将环境保护相邻权嵌入该制度。为避免"公地悲剧"的发生,宜在物权编构建"公众共用物"制度,将环境容量使用权纳入至物权体系。就民法典合同编而言,基于排污权交易合同当事人与合同生效时间的特殊性,以及为刺激环境保护由被动转向主动、由负担转向增益,宜将排污权交易合同有名化为一类单独的合同类型。考虑到传统契约附随义务理论基础仅限于诚实信用原则,未觉察到环境保护的必要,在绿色原则演替为民法基本原则之际,宜将该原则纳入附随义务体系,令契约当事人承担保护环境的附随义务。就民法典侵权责任编而言,基于生态系统本身的美学价值与生态价值,宜构建生态损害赔偿制度。为给生态损害赔偿制度提供制度补给,彰显法典的形式逻辑体系性,宜将环境权纳入民事权益范畴。

语种：

中文

出版日期：

2019-01-15

学科：

民商法学

收录：

CSSCI

提交日期：

2019-03-16

引用参考：

侯国跃;刘玖林. 民法典绿色原则:何以可能以及如何展开[J]. 求是学刊,2019(01):108-118.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 民法典绿色原则:何以可能以及如何展开
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 侯国跃;刘玖林
  • dc.contributor.author
  • HOU Guo-yue;LIU Jiu-lin
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学民商法学院;
  • dc.publisher
  • 求是学刊
  • dc.publisher
  • Seeking Truth
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2019
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 01
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.46;No.248
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 108-118
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2019-01-15
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 绿色原则;法的安定性;法的现实化;公众共用物;生态损害赔偿
  • dc.subject
  • green principle;stability of the law;the realization of law;public commons;ecological damage compensation
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 绿色原则析出为民法基本原则,不仅将调整范围从人与人之间延伸至人与自然之间,而且实现了绿色发展从理念到制度的飞跃。为实现法的安定性以及法的现实化,避免绿色原则沦为"空中楼阁",在民法典分编编纂过程中,宜将绿色原则浸润至相应法律制度。就民法典物权编而言,宜完善我国相邻关系制度,扩大相邻范围,将环境保护相邻权嵌入该制度。为避免"公地悲剧"的发生,宜在物权编构建"公众共用物"制度,将环境容量使用权纳入至物权体系。就民法典合同编而言,基于排污权交易合同当事人与合同生效时间的特殊性,以及为刺激环境保护由被动转向主动、由负担转向增益,宜将排污权交易合同有名化为一类单独的合同类型。考虑到传统契约附随义务理论基础仅限于诚实信用原则,未觉察到环境保护的必要,在绿色原则演替为民法基本原则之际,宜将该原则纳入附随义务体系,令契约当事人承担保护环境的附随义务。就民法典侵权责任编而言,基于生态系统本身的美学价值与生态价值,宜构建生态损害赔偿制度。为给生态损害赔偿制度提供制度补给,彰显法典的形式逻辑体系性,宜将环境权纳入民事权益范畴。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The green principle is the basic principle of civil law, which not only extends the adjustment scope from between people to between people and nature, but also realizes the leap from the idea of green development to the system. In order to realize the stability and the reality of law, and to avoid the green principle becoming a"castle in the air", the green principle should be infiltrated into the corresponding legal system in the codification process of the civil code. As far as the property right of civil code is concerned, it is advisable to perfect the system of adjacent relation in our country, expand the scope of adjacent, and embed the right of environmental protection into the system. In order to avoid the tragedy of Commons, we should construct the system of"public Commons"in the property right system, and include the right to use environmental capacity into the property system. In terms of the contract codification of the civil code, based on the particularity of the parties to the contract of emission trading and the effective time of the contract, and in order to stimulate the environmental protection to change from being passive to being active and from burden to gain, it is advisable to name the contract of emission trading into a single type of contract. Considering that the theoretical basis of the traditional collateral obligation of contract is only limited to the principle of good faith and the necessity of environmental protection is not perceived, when the green principle is replaced as the basic principle of civil law, it is advisable to include the principle into the collateral obligation system and make the parties to the contract undertake the collateral obligation of environmental protection. As far as the tort liability of the civil code is concerned, on the basis of the aesthetic as well as ecological value of the ecosystem itself, the ecological damage compensation system should be established. In order to supply the system of compensation for ecological damage and show the form logic system of the code, it is necessary to include the environmental right into the scope of civil rights and interests.
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 司法部2018年度国家法治与法学理论研究项目专项任务课题“乡村振兴战略实施中法治保障问题研究”(18SFB5012)
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 23-1070/C
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1000-7504
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.657
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D923
回到顶部