社会善治目标下“特定活动”的刑法禁区

Prohibition on "Specific Activities" of Criminal Law for Social Good Governance

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

作者：

马梅凤

摘要：

禁令自写入刑法以来,其适用和执行中不断出现需要应对的新挑战和新问题:法理基础略显虚空;相关法律法规对禁令之规定呈碎片式分布;永久禁区虽有规范支持但有影响生计之嫌,司法救济措施规范层面尚未涉及等。针对规则粗陋,在甄别刑法禁令与诉讼禁令、行政禁令界限基础上,建构相关法律规范体系;在刑事司法、行政执法以及二者结合部位,找到衔接刑法、刑事诉讼法和行政法的路径,以合理设置"特定活动"刑法禁区;抓住禁令限制人身自由的敏感问题,亮出人文关怀牌,回应服刑人权利保障与禁令限制的重大现实需求。借鉴域外复权制度,跟进立法,形成制度支撑,以平衡保护服刑人个人的合法权利与社会的基本安全,达至社会善治目标。

语种：

中文

出版日期：

2018-12-05

学科：

刑法学

提交日期：

2018-12-20

引用参考：

马梅凤. 社会善治目标下“特定活动”的刑法禁区[J]. 河南警察学院学报,2018(06):79-89.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 社会善治目标下“特定活动”的刑法禁区
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 马梅凤
  • dc.contributor.author
  • MA Meifeng;Southwest University of Political Science and Law;Shaanxi Police Vocational College
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学;陕西警官职业学院;
  • dc.publisher
  • 河南警察学院学报
  • dc.publisher
  • Journal of Henan Police College
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2018
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 06
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.27;No.163
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 79-89
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2018-12-05
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 特定活动;刑法禁区;禁令性质;价值原点;复权制度
  • dc.subject
  • specific activity;prohibition of the criminal law;nature of the prohibition;value origin;rights recovery system
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 禁令自写入刑法以来,其适用和执行中不断出现需要应对的新挑战和新问题:法理基础略显虚空;相关法律法规对禁令之规定呈碎片式分布;永久禁区虽有规范支持但有影响生计之嫌,司法救济措施规范层面尚未涉及等。针对规则粗陋,在甄别刑法禁令与诉讼禁令、行政禁令界限基础上,建构相关法律规范体系;在刑事司法、行政执法以及二者结合部位,找到衔接刑法、刑事诉讼法和行政法的路径,以合理设置"特定活动"刑法禁区;抓住禁令限制人身自由的敏感问题,亮出人文关怀牌,回应服刑人权利保障与禁令限制的重大现实需求。借鉴域外复权制度,跟进立法,形成制度支撑,以平衡保护服刑人个人的合法权利与社会的基本安全,达至社会善治目标。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • From the legislation of prohibition to its application and implementation,challenges have been constantly emerged. These problems include unstable law foundation,unsystematic relevant laws and regulations on the prohibition as well as the limitations of judicial remedy. Although the permanent prohibition has regulations,it impacts livelihoods development to some extent. The relevant law system should be established to distinct from the prohibition of criminal law,procedure law and administrative law. In the criminal justice,administrative law or the combination of the two,the paper tries to find the connection among above three laws so that set up the prohibition on " specific activity" in criminal law at a reasonable range. The paper focuses on hot issues of limitation of personal freedom and shows humanistic concerns to meet major demands of rights protection of persons serving sentences and the prohibition. We should learn from the rights recovery system and lay a legislative support for the aim of balancing rights protection of persons serving sentences and basic social security in order to realize a social good governance.
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 中国法学会课题“未成年人社区矫正检察监督实证研究”(CLS(2017)C31)的阶段性成果; 教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“法治视阈下服刑人权利的边界——由禁止令制度设计切入”(17YJA820020); 陕西省教育厅专项科研项目“法治视阈下服刑人权利的边界——由禁止令制度设计切入”(17JK0952)的阶段性成果
  • dc.description.sponsorshipsource
  • 陕西省教委基金
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 41-1427/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1008-2433
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.194
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D924.3
回到顶部