严控再次犯罪指标下的行刑误区——监禁模式固化的成因及系统性破解

The Mistakes in Execution of Criminal Punishment against the Background of Strictly Controlling the Re-offending Rate——Reasons for the Solidification of the Imprisonment Mode and the Systematic Solution

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

王利荣

归属院系：

法学院

作者：

王利荣 ;李鹏飞

摘要：

控制行刑阶段再次犯罪不总是与降低重新犯罪率整体目标一致。施行外松内紧且逐步社会化的执行方案虽是抑制重新犯罪的治本之策,却因抬升行刑阶段的再犯罪指数而被长期搁置。在立法层面,刑法持续扩大"不得假释"范围明显带有社会短视眼光甚至体现了部门自保的动机,新增条目不仅拉裂刑罚结构层次及规范链条,还有悖于绝大多数服刑人重返社会的事实。在执法层面,因顾及再犯率,行刑部门更是将社会推入再度受害的风险之中。监狱管理以减刑为中心无异于将出狱人陡然推向陌生社会;危险驾驶人混押于看守所虽无再犯之虞,高压震慑却激化其对抗情绪且加剧犯罪传染;社区矫正部门评估犯罪人再犯风险时高频做出不予假释的意见,从外部堵住了监狱出口;社区矫正部门顾忌再犯率指标考核而强调全方位管控和不得不虚置执行逆转程序,这些都反映出执法取向的错乱。其原因在于政府、司法机构和公众都在不当放大再犯率对于社会治理状况的标识作用。从紧盯监狱循证矫正、服刑人危险性评估和社区矫正立法等分阶段考察,回归行刑一体化视角,凭借宏观政策杠杆,以扩大假释为支点,或可将整个行刑机制拉回理性轨道。

语种：

中文

出版日期：

2018-11-05

学科：

民商法学

收录：

CSSCI; 中国科技核心期刊

提交日期：

2018-12-06

引用参考：

王利荣;李鹏飞. 严控再次犯罪指标下的行刑误区——监禁模式固化的成因及系统性破解[J]. 政治与法律,2018(11):102-116.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 严控再次犯罪指标下的行刑误区——监禁模式固化的成因及系统性破解
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 王利荣;李鹏飞
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Wang Lirong;Li Pengfei
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学法学院;
  • dc.publisher
  • 政治与法律
  • dc.publisher
  • Political Science and Law
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2018
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 11
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • No.282
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 102-116
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2018-11-05
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 再次犯罪;;重新犯罪;;不得假释;;重减轻拘;;社区管控
  • dc.subject
  • Re-offending;;Recommitting a Crime;;No Parole;;Heavy Commutation and Light Detention;;Community Management and Control
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 控制行刑阶段再次犯罪不总是与降低重新犯罪率整体目标一致。施行外松内紧且逐步社会化的执行方案虽是抑制重新犯罪的治本之策,却因抬升行刑阶段的再犯罪指数而被长期搁置。在立法层面,刑法持续扩大"不得假释"范围明显带有社会短视眼光甚至体现了部门自保的动机,新增条目不仅拉裂刑罚结构层次及规范链条,还有悖于绝大多数服刑人重返社会的事实。在执法层面,因顾及再犯率,行刑部门更是将社会推入再度受害的风险之中。监狱管理以减刑为中心无异于将出狱人陡然推向陌生社会;危险驾驶人混押于看守所虽无再犯之虞,高压震慑却激化其对抗情绪且加剧犯罪传染;社区矫正部门评估犯罪人再犯风险时高频做出不予假释的意见,从外部堵住了监狱出口;社区矫正部门顾忌再犯率指标考核而强调全方位管控和不得不虚置执行逆转程序,这些都反映出执法取向的错乱。其原因在于政府、司法机构和公众都在不当放大再犯率对于社会治理状况的标识作用。从紧盯监狱循证矫正、服刑人危险性评估和社区矫正立法等分阶段考察,回归行刑一体化视角,凭借宏观政策杠杆,以扩大假释为支点,或可将整个行刑机制拉回理性轨道。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The control of re-offence in the phrase of execution of criminal punishment is not always inconformity with the overall goal of reducing re-offending rate. To implement an execution plan, which is loose externally and tight internally and has the characteristic of gradual socialization, is the fundamental strategy for refraining the criminal from re-commit a crime in the period of execution of criminal punishment but has been long set aside due to increasing re-offending index in the phrase of execution of criminal punishment. At the legislative level, the criminal law continuously expands the scope of "non-parole", which is short-sighted for the society even shows the motive of self-protection of the department. The newly-added items not only tear apart the structural layers of criminal punishment but also is contrary to the fact that most sentence-servers return to the society. At the law-enforcement level, because of considering the re-offending rate, the department of executing criminal punishment pushes the society under the risk of being damaged again. The prison management is centered on the commutation of sentence, which is equal to pushing the former prisoner into strange society. Dangerous drivers who are put into custody in the jail are unable to reoffend a crime, but the high-pressure of awe intensifies their antagonism and increases criminal infection.The community correction department give its opinion of "no parole" when the criminal is evaluated as having high re-offending risk, thus closing up the exit of the prison from the outside. The community correction department is afraid of the index test of re-offending rate and then strengthens all-round control and has to set aside punishment reverse procedures. All these phenomena reflect the disorder in the law-enforcement orientation and are due to the reason that the government, judicial organs and the public unproperly amplify the signal role of the re-offending rate in social governance situation. The whole mechanism of execution of criminal punishment may be drawn back to the rational track by phrase-by-phrase investigation of focusing on evidence-based correction in prison, evaluation of dangerousness of sentence-servers and legislation on community correction, from the returned perspective of integrated execution of criminal punishment, taking advantage of the leverage of macro-policies to pivot on expansion of parole.
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 2017年中国法学会课题“未成年人社区矫正检察监督实证研究”(课题编号:CLS[2017]C31)的基础性成果
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 31-1106/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1005-9512
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 1.286
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D926.7
回到顶部