专利侵权非罪化辨析

On Decriminalization of Patent infringement

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

康添雄

作者:

康添雄

摘要:

依照我国《刑法》规定,专利侵权行为在现行法律体系中并未入罪。是否将侵犯专利权行为纳入调整范围之中,当今世界各国刑法规范呈现了两种截然不同的态度。虽然各国立法例一致要求行为人承担民事责任,但在刑责惩罚上却没有表达出同样一致的意愿,或者说并未赋予专利权人在刑法层面上的保护。就除罪或入罪的根本性考量要素而言,由于行为本身并不存在强烈的社会危害性反而可能具有正的外部性,以及作为专利权对象的科学技术本身所具备的公共产品属性,专利侵权入罪的立法呼吁并不具备充要条件。因此,立法者所要做的仅仅只是坚持现有刑法规范而已。

语种:

中文

出版日期:

2014-03-26

学科:

民商法学

提交日期

2018-11-13

引用参考

康添雄. 专利侵权非罪化辨析[J]. 河北科技大学学报(社会科学版),2014(01):45-52.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 专利侵权非罪化辨析
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 康添雄
  • dc.contributor.author
  • KANG Tian-xiong;School of Civil and Commerical Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学民商法学院;
  • dc.publisher
  • 河北科技大学学报(社会科学版)
  • dc.publisher
  • Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology(Social Sciences)
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2014
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 01
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.14;No.53
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 45-52
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2014-03-26
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 专利侵权;;非罪化;;社会危害性;;技术公共性
  • dc.subject
  • patent infringement;;decriminalize;;social harmfulness;;technological publicity
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 依照我国《刑法》规定,专利侵权行为在现行法律体系中并未入罪。是否将侵犯专利权行为纳入调整范围之中,当今世界各国刑法规范呈现了两种截然不同的态度。虽然各国立法例一致要求行为人承担民事责任,但在刑责惩罚上却没有表达出同样一致的意愿,或者说并未赋予专利权人在刑法层面上的保护。就除罪或入罪的根本性考量要素而言,由于行为本身并不存在强烈的社会危害性反而可能具有正的外部性,以及作为专利权对象的科学技术本身所具备的公共产品属性,专利侵权入罪的立法呼吁并不具备充要条件。因此,立法者所要做的仅仅只是坚持现有刑法规范而已。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • According to the regulations of our criminal law,patent infringement behavior has not incriminated in the current legal system.Whether to let the patent infringement included in the scope of adjustment,criminal laws from worldwide presented two completely different attitudes.Although almost every country's legislation requests the actor bear civil liability unanimously,it has not achieved the same consistent intend on penalty charge,or,in the other way,it does not give protection for patent holders at the level of the criminal law.For the fundamental consideration factors of decriminalization or incriminalization,because the behavior itself does not have fierce social harmfulness and it may have a positive externality instead,and the public product attribute of the science and technology in the object of the patent right itself,there is no sufficient and necessary condition to support the legislation appeal to incriminalize the patent infringement.Therefore,what the legislators need to do is just to adhere to the regulations of existing criminal law.
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(12YJC820044)
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 13-1303/G4
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1671-1653
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.196
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D923.42
回到顶部