秦汉基层治安制度研究

The Research of Grass-root Security System during Qin and Han Dynasty

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属院系:

刑事侦查学院

作者:

张婧

导师:

戴浩霖

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

秦汉;乡;里;亭;农村;治安体系

摘要:

我国农村治安一直是一个老大难的问题。农村治安有着不同于城市治安的显著特点。虽然现今的农村社会已经不是一个完全的熟人社会,但它的本质仍是依血缘聚集。这个社会的基础不是个人,而是家族。它类似于两千年来中国的整体社会状况。无论时代如何变迁,政治如何更迭,我国的农村社会仍然深深烙印着千年文化的痕迹。所以要想解决好农村的治安问题,我们还是得回头看,回到打上这个烙印最初的时代——秦汉,将秦汉时期乡里亭设置的经验,运用于当代农村警务的构建中,用以解决农村治安问题。笔者就是以此为切入点,通过研究秦汉时期的治安理论思想、相关设置、职能,追溯中华民族治安思想的根源,了解孕育农村社会的土壤,找出可供借鉴的做法,创建出一套以秦汉历史为鉴的农村基层治安防控体系。 全文分为四个部分,大约25000字。文章阐述了秦汉治安思想的渊源及其演变,即从法家的依法治国到道家的无为而治,再到为尊儒术,然后介绍构筑秦汉基层治安体系的乡里亭,及其各自发挥的治安职能,最后回归到当代农村治安状况,简略介绍了目前最为主要的几项治安问题,而后借鉴秦汉基层治安体系,结合实际情况,构建出适应当代农村的治安防控体系。 第一部分,秦汉治安思想的渊源与演变。该部分从先秦法家的治安思想入手,介绍了影响秦制的两个人,即管仲和商鞅。随后介绍秦朝的法家思想,它几乎是延续了商鞅变法的所有法令及精神,并且运用了韩非的行赏施罚思想。最后介绍了两汉的尊儒思潮,尽管这一时期的治安理念变化较快,但本质上仍是霸王道杂之,法道儒三家的思想在汉朝完成了融合,形成了延续千年的中国文化。 第二部分,秦汉时期基层治安体系。该部分主要介绍了构成秦汉基层治安体系的乡里亭。从乡里亭的设置以及其人员配置,立体地了解秦汉基层治安体系的实际运作情况。 第三部分,秦汉时期乡里亭的治安职能。该部分主要从四个方面说明乡里亭的主要治安职责,即户籍管理、抓捕罪犯、协助郡县侦查办理刑事案件、维持辖区社会秩序。这四项基本职能涵盖了基层社会的主要治安需求。 第四部分,秦汉乡亭制度对当前农村治安体系构建的启示。该部分的内容回归到了现在农村社会,首先阐述了当代农村主要的治安问题,其后借鉴乡里亭制度,对于如何构建农村治安防控体系提出了笔者自己的看法。

学科:

中外政治制度

提交日期

2018-01-11

引用参考

张婧. 秦汉基层治安制度研究[D]. 西南政法大学,2013.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 秦汉基层治安制度研究
  • dc.title
  • The Research of Grass-root Security System during Qin and Han Dynasty
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20100301220846
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 张婧
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2013
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 戴浩霖
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 秦汉;;乡;;里;;亭;;农村;;治安体系
  • dc.subject
  • Qin and Han dynasty;;village;;country;;pavilion;;rural community;;Security system
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 我国农村治安一直是一个老大难的问题。农村治安有着不同于城市治安的显著特点。虽然现今的农村社会已经不是一个完全的熟人社会,但它的本质仍是依血缘聚集。这个社会的基础不是个人,而是家族。它类似于两千年来中国的整体社会状况。无论时代如何变迁,政治如何更迭,我国的农村社会仍然深深烙印着千年文化的痕迹。所以要想解决好农村的治安问题,我们还是得回头看,回到打上这个烙印最初的时代——秦汉,将秦汉时期乡里亭设置的经验,运用于当代农村警务的构建中,用以解决农村治安问题。笔者就是以此为切入点,通过研究秦汉时期的治安理论思想、相关设置、职能,追溯中华民族治安思想的根源,了解孕育农村社会的土壤,找出可供借鉴的做法,创建出一套以秦汉历史为鉴的农村基层治安防控体系。 全文分为四个部分,大约25000字。文章阐述了秦汉治安思想的渊源及其演变,即从法家的依法治国到道家的无为而治,再到为尊儒术,然后介绍构筑秦汉基层治安体系的乡里亭,及其各自发挥的治安职能,最后回归到当代农村治安状况,简略介绍了目前最为主要的几项治安问题,而后借鉴秦汉基层治安体系,结合实际情况,构建出适应当代农村的治安防控体系。 第一部分,秦汉治安思想的渊源与演变。该部分从先秦法家的治安思想入手,介绍了影响秦制的两个人,即管仲和商鞅。随后介绍秦朝的法家思想,它几乎是延续了商鞅变法的所有法令及精神,并且运用了韩非的行赏施罚思想。最后介绍了两汉的尊儒思潮,尽管这一时期的治安理念变化较快,但本质上仍是霸王道杂之,法道儒三家的思想在汉朝完成了融合,形成了延续千年的中国文化。 第二部分,秦汉时期基层治安体系。该部分主要介绍了构成秦汉基层治安体系的乡里亭。从乡里亭的设置以及其人员配置,立体地了解秦汉基层治安体系的实际运作情况。 第三部分,秦汉时期乡里亭的治安职能。该部分主要从四个方面说明乡里亭的主要治安职责,即户籍管理、抓捕罪犯、协助郡县侦查办理刑事案件、维持辖区社会秩序。这四项基本职能涵盖了基层社会的主要治安需求。 第四部分,秦汉乡亭制度对当前农村治安体系构建的启示。该部分的内容回归到了现在农村社会,首先阐述了当代农村主要的治安问题,其后借鉴乡里亭制度,对于如何构建农村治安防控体系提出了笔者自己的看法。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Rural public security in our country has always been a long-existing andremarkably difficulty issue. It has marked characteristics different from urban areas.Although rural community nowadays is not a acquaintance one, it is still gathered bythe ties of kin. The basis of this community is clan rather than individual. It resemblesthe whole China’s social status in the past2000years. No matter how times changeand politics alternates, rural community in our country still has deeply-embeddedfeatures of the thousand-year long history. In that way, to solve the rural publicsecurity issue, we need to look back and go back to the initial times of thefeatures—Qin and Han dynasty. We can apply the experience of setting up ruralpavilions during this period to the construction of police work nowadays to settle therural public security issue. With this starting point, the author researched the theoryand ideology of public security during Qin and Han dynasty, traced the roots ofChina’s public security ideology and got to know the foundation for the formation ofrural community to find out ways for references of modern rural public security and toestablish a prevention and control system of rural grass-roots public securityaccording to the Qin and Han history. The whole thesis consists of four parts and has almost25000words. The thesiselaborates the origins and evolution of the public security ideology during Qin andHan period, i.e. from governing a country by law to mixture of force of dictators andbenevolent government, and at last to worship for Confucianism. Then it introducesthe rural pavilions which constitute the basis of public grass-root security system andtheir responsibilities for public security respectively. Finally, the thesis goes back topresent state of rural public security and introduces briefly a number of presentprimary issues of public security. It then uses the public security system as referenceand take the real situation into consideration to construct the public securityprevention and control system suitable for the present rural community. The first part is the origin and evolution of the public security ideology. To startwith public security ideology of Legalists during the Pre-Qin Period, this partintroduces Guan Zhong and Shang Yang who influenced the administration of Qin.Legalism, presented afterwards, nearly continued all the decrees and spirits ofReforms of Shang Yang and utilize the thought of implementing reward and punishment. Current of worship for Confucianism comes at last. Although the idea ofpublic security changes quickly in this period, it in essence is still mixed up withbullying and benevolent government. Legalists, Taoists and the Confucianistsconverged in Han dynasty and together represented the Chinese culture which wenton for over1000years. The second part is grass-roots rural public security system. This part mainlyintroduces the rural pavilions which constitute the grass-roots rural public securitysystem. It can be understood from a whole picture that how grass-roots public securitysystem works by the installation of the rural pavilions and disposure of the personnel. The third part is the function of the rural pavilion during Qin and Han. This partexplains the main responsibilities of rural pavilions from four aspects namelyhousehold registration, arresting criminals, assisting province and county to deal withcriminal cases and maitaince of social order of area under jurisdiction. These fourbasic responsibilities cover the major needs for public security of grass-rootscommunity. The fourth part is the revelation of rural pavilion system during Qin and Han forthe construction of rural public security system nowadays. This part goes back to thepresent rural community and firstly elaborates the main public securities issues in thepresent rural community. Then it uses rural pavilion system as reference to deliverauthor’s own opinions about how to construct the rural public security prevention andcontrol system.
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D691.6
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2013-03-10
回到顶部